【禁闻】八旬老太状告财政部 法院取消开庭

【新唐人2013年10月10日讯】年届八旬的北京访民王秀英,状告财政部拒绝公开对朝鲜援助的有关资讯。北京一中院受理诉状并且决定10月8号开庭。8号当天,王秀英突破警方重重阻拦,赶到法院之后,却被告知庭审已经取消。兴奋赶来旁听的媒体也扑了个空。

现年82岁的王秀英,去年12月向财政部提出资讯公开申请,要求财政部公开中国在2011年和2012年援助朝鲜的资讯。但是,财政部以涉及国家机密为理由,拒绝公开有关信息。今年5月,王秀英将财政部告上法庭,法院同意受理此案,并决定在10月8号下午两点开庭。

9月29号,王秀英的女儿王凤仙接到一个电话,告诉她“法院不会开庭了”。王凤仙要求对方履行法律正式程式,但没有结果。8号中午12点,王秀英和女儿准备前往法庭时,受到来自北京市白纸坊派出所警察的阻拦。

北京访民王秀英女儿王凤仙:“昨天上午早上起来,我这儿就有警车堵门,然后12点20分的时候我们出去,要去法院,警察就不让去。最后连分局的人都来了。僵持了一个小时,我们把事发出去了,有用推特给推出去了。就说警察阻止,不让老太太去法庭。结果1点1刻的时候,他们警察撤了,我们就打着车去了法院。到那儿两点。”
 
但是,当他们按时到达法庭的时候,法庭书记员仅以口头通知“不开庭了”,至于什么时候开庭,则另行通知。许多手握旁听证赶来的媒体记者,都扑了个空。

王凤仙:“他当时还给好多人开了旁听证的证明,结果这个书记员,今天反应过来说,我们失误了。我们要判我们就不给你开这个旁听证了。” 

那么,在此之前,北京一中院为什么同意开庭?王凤仙和其他人都觉得:或许这是法院的一个失误?

而王秀英之前为什么想要要求财政部公开对朝鲜的援助资讯呢?

王凤仙:“坦率说,我们就是一访民。我们现在了解底层的老百姓生活的特别苦。竟然在这种情况下,我们去援助它(朝鲜),它制造原子弹核武器,既然用我们的钱,老百姓就有权利知道这个钱在做什么。”  

北京维权人士李学惠代理这个案件,他向《新唐人》解释,状告财政部,并不追求结果,而是追求过程。是想让中共自己表现他们的丑陋。

北京维权人士李学惠:“中国是一个什么样的国家?社会状况是什么样?通过这一个事实来反映出来。我认为最好的结果是我们败诉,其次的结果是不开庭,第三个结果是我们胜诉。如果说,我们败诉,那证明的的确确,特别实实在在的表现:司法是不公正的。但是现在选择不开庭,也是表明这个不是真正的司法。”

王秀英和李学惠还向国家保密局提出政府资讯公开申请,要求公开中共援助朝鲜的项目,包括物资和资金的数额﹔要求保密局告知,这些是否是国家机密?保密等级是多少?保密期限是多久?但保密局至今没有任何回音。

李学惠:“然后我们向国家统计局表示,政府讯息公开,要求公布中国贫困人口的标准是什么?贫困人口有多少?我们有这么多的贫困人口,还要拿出钱来援助朝鲜,朝鲜去试验核武器,发射导弹,威胁亚洲乃至世界的和平。” 

李学惠说,他跟王秀英都是访民, 他们是社会最底层的人,受到许多司法不公正的待遇,没有人关注他们。

据王凤仙介绍,2001年他们家遭遇强拆,王秀英去向政府告状,但政府不给解决。王秀英再去天安门和中南海打横幅,当局还是不给解决。

2008年北京举行奥运会,王秀英申请游行,引起外媒关注。警方把当时77岁高龄的王秀英劳教一年。当时她已经有一只眼睛看不见,另外一只眼睛的视力也只有0.01。

采访编辑/秦雪 后制/陈建铭

Elderly Woman Sues Finance Ministry, Court Cancels Hearing

Ms. Wang Xiuying, a Beijing petitioner in her 80’s, has sued
the Ministry of Finance for refusing to disclose information
about aid given to North Korea.

The Beijing Intermediate People’s Court accepted the case
and decided to hold a hearing on October 8.
On Oct. 8th, after Ms. Wang got by all of the police,
she arrived in court, but was told the trial was cancelled
The excited members of the media allowed to
sit in on the hearing were speechless.

In Dec. 2012, 82-year-old Ms. Wang Xiuying requested the
Ministry of Finance to publicize information.
She requested information about the supplements that China
sent to North Korea between 2011 and 2012.
She was told such information is a state secret.

In May, Ms. Wang sued the Ministry of Finance
and the court accepted the case.
The hearing was scheduled for 2:00 pm on Oct. 8.

On Sept. 29, Ms. Wang’s daughter Wang Fengxian received
a phone call telling her that the Court won’t hear the case.
Wang Fengxian asked that they carry out the legal procedures,
but replied in vain.
At noon on Oct. 8, Wang Xiuying and her daughter were
blocked by police officers from the Beijing Baizhifang
police station when they prepared to go to court.

Wang Fengxian: “esterday morning, there was a police car
blocking people when I got up.
We left at 12:20pm, but were stopped by police on the way
to court, and they had more officers arrive.
We were deadlocked for an hour until someone posted to their
Twitter that the police wouldn’t let an old lady go to court.
At around 1:15pm, the policemen withdrew and we drove to
court, and arrived at 2pm."

When they arrived at court on time, the court clerk only stated
orally that court would not be in session until further notice.
Many media reporters permitted to sit in were left dumbstruck.

Wang Fengxian: “The clerk who issued a lot of people permits
to sit in said this was a mistake, saying: We don’t give permits
if we know ahead of time that it’s cancelled."

So, before this, why did Beijing court accept the case?

Wang Fengxian and others agreed that this might be
a mistake from the court.

Why does Ms. Wang Xiuying want the Ministry of Finance to
publish this information on aid to North Korea?

Wang Fengxian: “Frankly speaking, we are just petitioners.
We knew that lower class citizens have a hard life.
Under such a circumstance, we still supported North Korea.

However, they used our support to produce nuclear weapons.
The Chinese regime gave away our money,
we have the right to know how our money has been used."

Beijing activist Li Xuehui is helping with Ms. Wang’s case.

He told NTD that the result of Ms. Wang’s lawsuit
isn’t important, but the procedure is.
They want to see how badly the CCP reacts.

Beijing activist Li Xuehui:
“What kind of country is China?
What is the state of society now?
It will be reflected from this case.
I think the best result is that we lose the case,
the second best result is that the hearing isn’t held,
the third is that we win the case.

If we lose the case, it proves that the judiciary is unjust.
Now they chose to cancel the trial,
which also proved that they are not a true judiciary."

Ms. Wang Xiuying and Li Xuehui have also requested that
the National Administration for the Protection of State Secrets
publicize information on aid given to North Korea,
including the amount of goods and funds sent.
They asked, do these issues belong to state secrets?
What is the degree of secrecy?
How long will these secrets be kept for?
They have yet to receive any response.
 
Li Xuehui:"Then we asked the National Bureau of Statistics
to release the information.
We asked them what the standard of poverty is.
How much of China’s population lives in poverty?
China has so many people living in poverty,
but the regime sends funds to support North Korea,
and yet North Korea uses these funds to do nuclear tests,
firing missiles, threatening Asian and world peace."

Li Xuehui says that he and Ms. Wang Xiuying are petitioners,
the lowest class citizens who face many judicial injustices,
and no one pays attention to them.

Wang Fengxian says that their home was
forcibly demolished in 2001,
her mother complained to the government,
but they didn’t want to deal with it.
Ms. Wang later went to Tiananmen and Zhongnanhai,
unfolding banners to protest,
but authorities still haven’t dealt with her mistreatment.

During the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Ms. Wang Xiuying
applied for permission to hold a parade to draw public attention.
However, police sentenced the 77-year-old Ms. Wang
to one year in jail.
At that time, Ms. Wang was blind in one eye,
and her other eye’s visual acuity is only 0.01.

相关文章
评论