【新唐人2012年4月4日讯】据《博讯》网透露：温家宝最近提到，六四以后一批学生流落海外已经二十多年了，一直不让他们回国，甚至在他们的父母弥留之际，也不让他们回国。父母去世，也不允许他们回国奔丧，这是很不人道的，应该让他们回国、回家看看。这篇以“樵夫”署名的文章无法被核实是否是温家宝所说的话，不过，经历“六四”的中国海外流亡学生也提出，中国是他们的国家，不是中共的，是中共霸占了这个国家，如果温家宝有善念的话，应该退出这个制度。
“樵夫”这篇文章是以第一人称口吻写道。其中温家宝说，他们中绝大多数是爱国的，而且有些人和“六四”也没有什么关系，只是在海外批评了我们工作中的一些错误罢了。他们已经流落海外二十多年了，让他们回国，根本没有什么了不起！
“六四”幸存者、民运领袖唐柏桥：“不是他们允许不允许我们回国的问题，是 整个中共应该被抛弃的问题。这个国家是我们的国家，他们目前霸占了这个国家，做一些违法犯罪的事情，当然迟早要遭到清算的。事实上，现在这个政权继续迫害人民，对法轮功、对西藏人、6.4对学生，对所有人。”
唐柏桥表示，结束了这个罪恶的制度，一切问题自然而然就得到了解决。他认为，如果温家宝有善念的话，应该退出这个制度，避免陪葬这个“死亡游戏规则”的政权。
文章中，温家宝还批评一些驻外使领馆，动不动就把批评中国政府的人划入另类，要么取消他们的护照，要么不给他们的护照延期，更不发给他们签证。这种敌视一切的做法太左了！温家宝还说，不要把善意批评我们缺点的人，都说成是海外敌对势力。
中国宪政学者王天成：“他是不是在演戏、是不是真的，这个问题不重要。重要的就是说温家宝有这种想法，他的想法能不能形成共同的决定，成为一个政治决定。这个才是关键。他不能推动政改也不是他意愿的问题，重要的是党内力量对比的问题。保守的人居多数、强硬派居多数，还是改革派、温和派居多数，占据相对优势，重要是这个问题。”
王天成认为，这也可能是共产党内部释放的一些混乱资讯，把事情搞乱，耗大家时间。
樵夫还透露，周永康私下对抗温家宝的指示，以维稳为借口，拟定了数百人的黑名单，绝对不允许他们入境中国。
而3月30号的《纽约时报》也披露，在处理薄熙来的讨论中，中共政治局九常委投票，决定免去薄熙来重庆市委书记职务时，主管政法的常委周永康反对。而且，内斗使高层承认，中共政权相当脆弱。
唐柏桥认为，中共的政治内斗完全是争权夺利的斗争，是这个制度避免不了的，也是人民抛弃他们的过程。
唐柏桥：“几千年以来，古今中外专制暴政总会有不停的宫廷内斗。宫廷内斗会造成这个统治地位被削弱，直到有一天，他们分崩离析，有一个新的政权或者一个新的制度取代。这是历史规律，这是他们任何人阻止不了的。”
不过，据《新纪元》周刊消息，中共执掌政法系统的元老乔石，在退隐十年之后，今年初痛批周永康治下的“政法委”，使中国法治出现倒退。
《新纪元》指出，随着迫害法轮功而坐大的中共“政法委”，维稳经费已超军费开支、拥有的武警数量也能与军队相匹敌，它独揽司法、公安、检察、国安、警卫、情报等系统，权力凌驾和超越中共各级党委，与德国的盖世太保一样权力无限。现在“政法委”一方面作为迫害法轮功、迫害民众的工具，另一方面拥有独立的武装力量，已经能与胡温分庭抗礼。
采访/秦雪 编辑/宋风 后制/孙宁
======================
Rumour: Wen Jiabao Attempt to Lift Ban on Exiled Students
It has been revealed by Boxun website that Wen Jiabao
recently mentioned a group of exile students.
They have been living overseas for over 20 years
after June 4th.
The CCP did not let them back even
when their parents lay dying.
It is very inhuman to prohibit them from returning home,
when their parents pass away. The CCP should allow them to return.
The article is signed by ‘Woodman’,
so it cannot be verified as truth.
However, some exiled students pointed out that China
is their country, and the CCP just occupies it.
If Wen is on the good side, he should exit the CCP.
Woodman’s article is based on first-person tone.
In the article, Wen said most of the exiled students love
China, and some have no relationship with June 4th.
They just criticized some of the errors in the CCP.
They have been living overseas for over 20 years, and
there is no great problem in letting them return.
Tang Baiqiao, a June 4th survivor and pro-democracy
leader commented: “The problem is not about allowing us return or not.
In fact, the CCP should be abandoned. This is our country
and the CCP just occupied it with criminal actions.
Of course, the CCP will be subject to liquidation
sooner or later.
This regime continues to persecute people, Falun Gong,
Tibetans, and “June 4th” students. ” Tang Baiqiao said once this evil system is over,
all problems will be resolved naturally.
He said, if Wen is on the good side, he should exit the CCP.
In the article, Wen criticized some overseas embassies
and consulates.
They put the name of people who criticized
Chinese government in a special document.
They dealt with these people by canceling their passports,
rejecting passport extensions, or rejecting issuing visas.
All these methods are a kind of leftism. Wen said, they
should not describe critics as hostile forces overseas.
Wang Tiancheng, a Chinese constitutional scholar
commented: “Whether Wen is acting is not important.
If Wen has these ideas and gets other leaders’agreement,
it will be great. In fact, reform development is not due to his idea only.
The most important issue is balancing power within the CCP.
Who has the advantage, hard-liners or reformists?”
Wang Tiancheng said this article maybe a kind of confusion
information from CCP. It may mess things up intentionally.
‘Woodman’ also revealed that Zhou Yongkang
opposed Wen’s instructions.
Zhou made up a blacklist of hundreds of people and
refused them entry to China.
This was done using the excuse of stability maintenance.
New York Times disclosed on March 30, when discussing
Bo Xilai, that Zhou opposed the desicion of replacing Bo’s duties.
Upper levels of the CCP admitted that infighting made
the CCP regime quite fragile.
Tang Baiqiao thought, the CCP infighting is totally
a battle of power and the CCP cannot avoid it.
The CCP infighting also makes Chinese people
abandon the CCP.
Tang Baiqiao: “For thousands of years, palace infighting
has existed in both ancient and modern tyrannies.
Infighting made the regime weaken, until one day,
the regime fell apart and was replaced by a new regime.
This is a law of history and no one can stop it.”
However, according to the The Epoch Times, Qiao Shi,
who controlled the political and legal system of the CCP
more than 10 years ago, criticized Zhou Yongkang and
the Politics and Law Committee in the early part of this year.
Qiao Shi thought Zhou made the legal system
take a step backwards.
The Epoch Times highlights the CCP Politics and Law
Committeeexpanded with the persecution of Falun Gong.
It’s stability maintenance budgets are more than
the military spending.
The number of its armed police also match with the army.
The CCP Politics and Law Committee controls many
systems on its own, including judicial system,
public security, procuratorial system, national security,
and the intelligence system.
Its unlimited power overides other CCP committees,
just like the Nazi Gestapo.
The CCP Politics and Law Committee is a tool
for persecuting Falun Gong and other people
It can stand against Hu-Wen based on its independent
armed forces.
