【新唐人2013年06月10日讯】枪杆子和笔杆子，历来是中共窃取政权和维护独裁统治的两大法宝，然而最近枪杆子开始抢占笔杆子阵地，继中共军方“鹰派” 发出保卫“网络上甘岭”的言论后，日前，“国防大学”中将李殿仁又放出﹕微博威胁国家安全的厥词。专家认为，现在中共犹如困在笼子里的斗兽，这是它阵亡前失去理智的癫狂。
7号，中共解放军“国防大学”教授李殿仁中将，接受《中国社会科学报》采访时说，作为新媒体代表的“微博”，已成为反体制言论的集散地，也成为颜色革命的重要战场，其中宪政主义、新自由主义以及历史虚无主义三股思潮，李殿仁认为，值得警惕。
美国“纽约城市大学”政治学 夏明：“中国处于乱世前夕，（各种）极端的思想都出笼了，使得中间这种温和的讨论变得不可能了，这是一个非常危险的东西，我把它叫成中共的意识形态的羊癫疯。”
美国“纽约城市大学”政治学夏明教授指出，历史上，希特勒和日本法西斯抬头之前，都处在思想极端化状态。当前，中共内部左派思想非常活跃，另一方面，民主宪政深入民心，而中共当局无法调和这两种矛盾。
“全球自由信息运动”网站创办人张新宇：“实际上是一帮盗贼，他们感到危机了，赤裸裸的跳出来，过去搞这些东西还讲点道理，忽悠性，欺骗性，现在赤裸裸的出来，就会使更多的不明真相的人认清实质。”
早在去年，以戴旭、罗援等一批解放军鹰派代表，已经登陆微博，并发下豪言说﹕解放军将保卫“网络上甘岭”。太子党军官刘源和刘亚洲，日前提出的“共产党神性论”，也备受各界指责。
夏明认为，现在中共军队处于极度不安状态，“军人干政”则是极其危险的信号。夏明说，军人干政，往往会给社会带来血腥的镇压和道德的灾难。
而李殿仁认为，以“多党制、三权分立、议会民主”为支撑政治的宪政主义，最终目地是取消中共领导﹔主张私有化的新自由主义，则是扼杀公有制和国有企业的市场效率和活力﹔而历史虚无主义，则是用历史细节否定中共地位和作用。李殿仁说，相关的言论在微博上大行其道，必将酿成大祸，威胁所谓国家安全。
张新宇：“实际上，这个国家的安全就是他们家的安全，微博的出现，他们感觉到对他们这帮盗贼的安全有危险，所以它就赤裸裸的出来，潜台词就是，我们要为我们这些盗贼抢来的财产、财富而斗争。”
李殿仁还提出，2011年初爆发的“茉莉花革命”及随后引发的北非、中东革命，是西方这一新型“战争手段”效果的一次经典体现。他说，这也预示着西方敌对势力，今后可能会更大规模、更广范围的运用这种手段。
李殿仁认为，以所谓“国防安全”为重点的新较量，已经在微博等新兴媒体上全面展开。而中共需要打好这场无形的战争，管控微博等新媒体。
张新宇：“如果进去，去所谓的战斗的话，一定是失败的，因为真理不在他们那（边），比如说，法轮功的这个《九评》，出来多少年了，共产党七千万党员，所有的都躲到阴沟里，没有哪个敢出来说我们来辩一辩。他们是理屈的，他们自己也知道，共产党也知道它们犯了死罪。”
夏明表示，中共阵亡的迹象已经非常明显，尤其思想上的混乱。而且，中共高层没有人真正信仰共产主义，老百姓更是看穿了共产党骗人的把戏。夏明说，中共末日迹象最明显的表现是，中共的所谓精英们，基本上失去了创造性，而反对它的那些人创造力在不断的增加。
采访编辑/ 刘惠 后制/李智远
Military Geared Up for Invisible War on Internet in China
Using military action and propaganda are prime weapons
the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) has used in illegally
taking power in China and in keeping its political rule today.
Recently, the CCP’s military “hawks" have
actively entered the turf of propaganda.
Lieutenant General Li Dianren from the
PLA National Defense University, has alleged that
the existence of the micro-blog
threatens national security.
Experts interpret that today, the CCP is like a
caged animal, which acts madly before its death.
On June 7, Li Dianren, professor at the PLA National
Defense University, recently denounced microblogging.
Li told the Chinese Social Sciences Today,
an officially sponsored academic newspaper,
that Weibo (microblog), as a new media, has
become a distribution center of anti CCP criticism.
It is also a major battleground for potential
“color revolutions”, he said.
Li warned the authorities they must guard against
the three ideological trends of constitutionalism,
neoliberalism and historical nihilism in today’s China.
(Pro. in Political Science, City University of New York)
Ming Xia: “China is on the eve of troubled times,
and various extremist ideas have surfaced.
This makes it impossible to take a moderate approach
to public debate, this situation is dangerous.
I call it the epilepsy of CCP ideology.”
Ming Xia reminds us that historically in Germany and Japan,
ideological extremity appeared before the
emergence of fascism.
Currently in China, the CCP’s left-wing ideology
is very active,
whilst at the same time, constitutionalism has been
embraced by civil society.
Xia says that the CCP authorities face
irreconcilable conflict between the two.
(Founder, Global Information Free Movement) Xinyu Zhang:
“The truth is that a bunch of thieves have felt crises
of their political rule, so they are breaking cover now.
Previously, they did it under the disguise of word play,
now, they simply break cover and advocate it openly.
These tactics confuse many of those
who haven’t known the truth.”
In 2012, a group of core figures of the PLA “hawks“
posted messages on Weibo, saying that the PLA will
safeguard “their lands” on the internet.
Two CCP princelings, Liu Yuan and Liu Yazhou,
both senior army officials,
have put forth a theory of “the CCP’s godhood”,
which has met with heavy criticism.
Ming Xia says that the PLA is now very stressed.
He warns that “military intervention in politics”
has sent an extremely dangerous signal.
This is because military intervention is often realized
by bloody repressions, and will cause moral disasters.
Li Dianren has argued that the advocacy of political
constitutionalism aims to remove the CCP leadership.
And that embracing the neo-liberal privatization
is bound to strangle efficiency and
to contain the vigor of the state-operated
economic system and of state-owned enterprises.
He says that historical nihilism is a negation of
the CCP’s status and role with historical details.
Also, Li alleged that the relevant popular remarks on Weibo
will breed disasters, and will “ threaten national security”.
Xinyu Zhang: “So ‘China’s security’ was used to replace
his true meaning of the ‘CCP’s security’.
The CCP has felt threatened with the advent of Weibo,
so currently they have broken cover.
Their subtext is: We are fighting for our robbed wealth.”
Li Dianren also mentioned the Jasmine Revolution
that occurred in early 2011,
and the subsequent revolutions in North Africa
and the Middle East.
He said that these were typical aftermath of
the new, Western “means of warfare".
This indicates that hostile Western forces may expand
the application of such tactics in the future, Li argued.
Li Dianren claimed that a new battle for “national security"
has been in full swing on Weibo, and other new media.
The CCP has to win this invisible war by
controlling new media, said Li.
Xinyu Zhang: “If they really engage in this battle,
they are bound to fail, as the truth isn’t on their side.
For example, the book ‘Nine Commentaries on the
Communist Party’ was published several years ago.
But until today, none of the 70 million CCP members
dares to openly speak against it.
They actually know that their power is unjustifiable,
and so does the CCP.”
Ming Xia points out that there are clear signs showing
the CCP’s demise, especially in its ideological chaos.
Nowadays, none of the CCP top leadership has true faith in
communism, this has been discerned by ordinary citizens.
The biggest sign of the CCP’s end, he says, is that
the Party elites have essentially lost their creativity.
In contrast, those who oppose it have kept on
demonstrating their originality.
