【新唐人2011年9月9日讯】在大陆，由于“城镇化”的开发，好多古村落都消失了。中共总理温家宝在最近的一次讲话中，虽然对大陆城市建设中，破坏文化遗产和强迫农民拆迁的现象提出批评，强调了保护文化传统的重要性。但据史学者表示，在中国，不仅仅是由于强拆破坏了中国文化，而是从中共建政以后，就在不断的摧毁着中国的文化。请看报导。
中共总理温家宝9月5号，在“中共文史研究馆”成立60周年的座谈会上发表讲话时，谈到了一个很多中国人都非常关注的问题，就是中国出现的破坏文化遗产和强迫农民拆迁的问题。
温家宝指出，现在有些地方不顾农民合法权益，搞强制拆迁，把农民赶上楼，丢掉的不仅是古村落，连现代农村的风光都没有了。他强调保护文化传统的重要性。
据民俗文化研究院参事冯骥才介绍，在中国，古村落现在进入一个空前的消亡加速期。一些地方正打着新农村和城镇化的幌子唯利是图。根本不遵从文化规律，而是从眼前的功利出发，把古村落改造得面目全非，把真的古村落搞成了假的古村落。
时事评论员文昭表示，本来中国是有文物保护单位的，叫文物局。如果村落是符合文物保护的是不能拆的。可是，在中共体制下，文物保护政策不能作为政绩。
文昭：“各省市不会说，以文物保护的成绩来衡量他们的政绩。它是以GDP来衡量他们的政绩。所以说，其他的所有东西都会选经济利益交汇。它（搞开发）不仅是通过地方政府财政来源，同时也是官员贪污腐败的一个重要渠道。 ”
文昭认为，中国不做体制性的改变，所有的问题今后还会出现，不会因为温家宝讲话就不出现那些问题了。
在座谈会上，冯骥才表示，古村落的消失，问题的症结，一个是商机，一个是不良政绩。实际上就是开发一个破坏一个。很多古村落在城市化的大潮中消失了。
历史学教授夏瑰琦认为，中共掌权以来，对中国古代的古村落起到摧毁的作用，对中国的古文化起着破坏作用。
夏瑰琦：“那么中共来了以后，它首先就是进行土地改革，这个土地改革就是要打破你这个种族之间的这些关系。它中共要人与人之间变成一个阶级关系，不是一种亲属的关系。本来亲属相互之间，都是小辈的要尊敬长辈的，然后长辈要做做他的模范行动，来影响下一辈的人，所以他有一个长辈尊幼的，有一个道德教化的作用。那么中共就要摧毁这个东西。”
有评论表示，现在中共利用权利，破坏中国古文化，来滋养它体制内的人，从而维护它的独裁政权。
不过，《美国之音》认为，温家宝的这个讲话，是中共当局对中国势力很大的地产开发机器，一次罕见的抨击。
新唐人记者周玉林、唐睿、薛莉采访报导。
====
Wen Jiabao on Forced Demolition of Heritage Villages
主播：
Due to urbanization in mainland China, many heritage villages
have disappeared, despite the fact that the premier of the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Wen Jiabao, criticized the
current urbanization, saying it is damaging the heritage culture
of China and forcing demolition of many villager’s homes.
Wen emphasized the importance of protecting the heritage.
However, according to historians, forced demolition is not
the only thing that has damaged the heritage culture of China,
The CCP has been damaging China’s heritage culture
from the very beginning of its rule.
In the speech made by Wen Jiabao on September 5,
during the 6oth anniversary
of the CCP Research Institute of Culture,
Wen mentioned that many Chinese are concerned about
the damage done to China’s cultural heritage
and forced demolition of villages.
Wen Jiabao pointed out that many local officials ignore
farmers’ legal rights, forcing demolition of their homes.
Historical villages are not the only losses incurred,
many suburban areas have lost its rural scenes.
Wen emphasized the importance of protecting cultural heritage.
According to China’s Institute of Folk Culture’s counselor
Feng Jicai, heritage villages are disappearing quickly.
Many local officials use the excuse of urbanization
to seek profits.
Instead of following cultural laws, they are driven solely by
financial gain, changing villages beyond recognition, and
swapping genuine heritage village for fake ones.
Commentator Wen Zhao said,
“There is a cultural heritage protection unit in China.
If a village qualifies for cultural heritage protection,
it cannot be removed.
However, under the CCP regime, heritage conservation
cannot be seen as political achievements.
Wen Zhao: “Local governments do not consider cultural
heritage protection as one of their achievement in politics.
Rather, they use Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Therefore, they are motivated by anything
that benefits their GDP.
Economic development is both a way to obtain funds
for local governments, and a means to cheat the state.
Wen Zhao said that if China doesn’t go through needed reform,
these same problems will persist.
Wen’s speech does nothing to solve the inherent problem.”
At the forum, Feng Jicai said, disappearing villages are
the crux of the problem,
as they represent economic opportunities for local officials.
In fact, one village’s development is followed by
another village being destroyed.
Many heritage villages are engulfed
in the wave of urbanization.
History professor, Xia Guiqi, believes that ever since the CCP
came to power, they damaged Chinese heritage villages,
as well as China’s cultural heritage.
Xia Guiqi: “After the CCP took over China,
the first thing they did was to enact land reform measures
to break the relationships between all the different ethnicities.
The CCP makes relationships between classes of people,
not relatives.
Originally, there was respect between relatives, i.e.:
the young respected their elders and elders acted as role models
in order to influence the next generation.
Then there is also respect from elders towards the young,
which is considered a part of moral education.
But the CCP wants to destroy all of this.
There are people who now think that the CCP is using its power
to destroy Chinese heritage culture, using it to benefit itself.
However, Voice of America believes that Wen’s speech
is a rare admonishment from the CCP towards the powerful
real estate development business.”
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Tang Rui and Xue Li
