【禁闻】香港议员“抗捐”演讲 网络疯传

【新唐人2013年05月02日讯】日前,香港立法会否决特首梁振英提出:就四川雅安地震捐款1亿港元的动议,引起中共不满。中共喉舌《人民日报》海外版及香港媒体发表评论文章,指责港人的“抗捐运动”,并将此事上升到政治高度,引起民间极大的反感和国际舆论关注。立法会议员黄毓民在会上指出,香港人“抗捐”是民意所向。他一番慷慨激昂的演讲在网上疯传,位列新浪网视频排行第一。

4月24号,黄毓民在港府立法会就“四川救援赈灾基金咨询会”上的发言,被大陆网民叫好,网民说:“这才是人民的议员”。

黄毓民:“司长。你有眼去见,有耳去听。五年前,我到街上筹款,三天50万。那时“社民联”成立不久,我站在西洋菜街筹款,三天50万,亲手送去香港红十字会。今时今日,你看看,香港红十字会三天只筹得500万,五年前三天就有5600万,你以为大家都是瞎了吗?”

黄毓民指出,港人拒绝捐款的原因,是因为不信任大陆贪官。过去的捐款都去向不明。

黄毓民:“非常简单的道理,就是不相信(中国红十字)!现在是连你也不信了嘛,林郑月娥。上次那90亿去了哪里了?你说那不是赈灾基金,我也早就知道了,但那是给了他们盖学校盖房子的,是不是?用到哪里去了?光是看这份文件,用于甘肃省泥石流的那笔钱,说是用来建一所社会福利院,(现在)在哪里?瞎扯,将我们的公帑这样(乱)用。”

黄毓民直接指出,一亿,是亲共港府向共产党表达效忠的,他还称呼港府是特共政府。

湖北宜昌工程监理刘家财说,看到黄毓民的演讲,他深表赞成。

湖北宜昌工程监理刘家财:“你捐的越多,被他们贪得越多。我反对捐款。因为他所有的捐款,他没有一个帐,他不透明,所有的开支不透明。以前地震,我还很热情。最后发现不是那么回事。 ”

香港《大公报》4月26号发表评论,指责香港人“抗捐”是反中央、反民族。官方媒体《人民日报》海外版也发表批评性评论文章,题为“少数港人抵制赈灾捐款—-他们的理由站得住脚吗?”

刘家财表示,港人抗捐的理由很充分。

刘家财:“首先我捐这个款,我要知道用到哪里去了?比方说重建项目,这个项目的质量又怎么样?比方说,这个项目我投资了两千万,盖了一栋学校,结果他的质量是豆腐渣工程,实际上根本不需要投入那么多钱。因为他偷工减料了。这一部分钱被一些私人老板和政府官员相互勾结,把这笔钱吃了回扣了。 ”

山东某大学教师郭全芳表示,她也看了黄毓民的演讲,她支持港人不捐款。她说,她自己也没捐。往年单位直接从工资里面扣,这一次改为自愿行为。

山东某大学教师郭全芳:“因为他现在,你捐的钱不是到了灾民手头上,而是贪官吃了、喝了、嫖了。灾区有一个灾民叫张敏岁的,他感谢全国人民的热心,他说不要捐钱,因为他们领救灾物品,还要交100元的交通费。 ”

郭全芳表示,本来慈善是一个很好的事情。中国人经常说,一方有难,八方支援。如果官府真正把每一分钱都用到灾民身上,民众捐多少都没有怨言。

《法国国际广播电台》评论说,公民无偿献血,被机构拿去卖给病人;建个中华脊髓库,问公民收取每次500元的检查费,病人想要得到骨髓,还要再交至少5万元。诸如此类的行为,意在借机敛财,大发国难财,鲸吞公民所捐善款,这才是真正的反中央、反国家、反民族。

采访编辑/秦雪 后制/葛雷

Hong Kong Council Member’s “Anti-donation" Speech

Recently, the Hong Kong Legislative Council rejected
Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying’s motion to raise
100 million yuan for the Ya’an earthquake disaster.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece
People’s Daily published an article on overseas editions and Hong Kong media,
accusing the Hong Kong people of
an “anti-donation” movement.
This issue has risen to the political heights, causing great
resentment from the public, attracting international attention.
Legislative Council member Wong Yuk-man pointed out
at the meeting that it was following public opinion.
His impassioned speech has been widely spread online
with the video ranked first on Sina Net.

On April 24th, Wong Yuk-man spoke in the council meeting
regarding the Sichuan Disaster Relief Funds.
He was applauded by Mainland netizens.
They called him a real people’s council member.
[Video]Wong Yuk-man: “Secretary of Justice,
you have eyes and ears, so you can see and hear.
Five years ago, I was on the street to collect donations.
Within 3 days, I received 500,000 and sent it to the Red Cross.
Today, the Hong Kong Red Cross collected
only 5 million in 3 days.
That would have been 56 million in 2008.
Do you really think that everyone is blind?”

Wong Yuk-man pointed out that Hong Kong people
refuse to donate money because they do not trust corrupt officials in the Mainland.
What has happened to the money raised in the past?

[Video] Wong Yuk-man: “a very simple reason,
we don’t trust the China Red Cross.
Now, we can’t even trust you. Mrs. Lam
where is the 9 billion we raised last time?
You say that was a Disaster Relief Fund, and I know that too.
That money was to build them a school. Where did it go?
Just look at this document, there was money to build a
social welfare institute, after the mud slide in Gansu Province.
Where is the institute now?
Is that how our public funds are being used?”

Wong Yuk-man said that one hundred million
is a Pro-CCP gesture.
He even called the Hong Kong government
the CCP’s special agent.
Liu Jiacai, Hubei engineering supervisor,
was moved by Wong’s speech.
Liu Jiacai: “The more you donate,
the more they take in. I oppose donations.
They do not have an account,
and they are not transparent.
I used to be quite enthusiastic about donating
money to earthquakes, but not anymore.”

On April 26th, the Hong Kong Ta Kung Bao
published an article, saying that
refusing to donate is both anti-central government
and anti-nation.
Official media, People’s Daily, overseas edition
also published a critical review article,
“A few Hong Kong people resist disaster relief donations
— are their reasons tenable? “

Liu Jiacai said that Hong Kong people have
a good reason to refuse to donate.
Liu Jiacai: “First, if I donate the money,
I want to know where this money goes.
For example, it goes to rebuilding.
But what kind of quality in construction?
If I invest 20 million yuan for a school,
actually it does not need that much.
Because the reconstruction is so shoddy,
they cut corners and accept kickbacks.
When private owners and officials collude
with each other, the money is gone.”

Guo Quanfang, instructor of Shandong University,
said that she watched Wong’s speech on video.
She supports the Hong Kong people’s actions.
She added that she did not donate either.
In the past, her work unit deducted money directly from
her paycheck. This year, it has changed to voluntary mode.
Guo Quanfang: “Your donation will not end up in victims’
hands. It is for officials to wine, dine, and entertain themselves.
One earthquake victim said he sincerely thanks
other people for their help.
He also said: “Don’t donate money– because victims
are even being charged 100 yuan transportation fee.”

Guo Quanfang commented that basically,
charity is a good thing.
Chinese people often say, when one person has a difficult time,
people from eight different directions will come to help.
If officials will really give every penny to the victims,
people will not complain about donations.
Radio France Internationale commented that when citizens
donate their blood free, the institute sells the blood to patients.
The China’s spinal cord bank charges patients 500 yuan for a
checkup and at least 50,000 for a bone marrow transplant.
Actions that aim at making money,
building wealth on others’ sufferings,
and robbing victims of their disaster relief funds
are true reflections of anti-central government, anti-state, and anti-nation.

相关文章
评论