【禁闻】腾讯控股主席管控微博研新招

【新唐人2011年11月2日讯】腾讯控股主席马化腾表示,因应中央和社会对于阻止虚假信息在网上传播的要求,腾讯公司正在研究新的方法监控腾讯微博服务上的内容。分析认为,这是找借口为中共独裁专制辨护。

周一(31日)腾讯公司(Tencent)CEO马化腾(Pony Ma)出席北京举办的科技博客大会﹙TechCrunch Disrupt﹚时表示,正在研究新的方法监控腾讯微博上的内容,他说,公司对出现在微博上的虚假信息感到棘手,网络用户可能认为这些虚假信息是真的。

前山东大学教授孙文广认为,马化腾是为中共当局辨护。

孙文广:“所谓的虚假信息,就是民众有的揭发中共当局的一些丑行,他们讲是虚假的,为中共当局辨护。实际上现在需要造谣的、需要制造假信息的是某些官员呢,真正的人民群众当然希望知道真相。”

曾在多家媒体工作的“结石宝宝之家”发起人赵连海,也是腾迅微博的使用者,他认为,马化腾这是找理由企图扼死人说话的权力。

赵连海:“从目前来看我们总体还是对腾迅微博比较认可,认为腾迅公司坚守一些原则,但如果马化腾就这么刻意的去执行(监控微博)下去的话,我们不得不对腾迅公司,包括马化腾本人我们要有很多的看法了。”

赵连海说,用各种理由和借口去扼死人说话的权力,应该遭到遣责和鄙视,希望更好的人站出来抵制。

孙文广则强调,微博本身正是揭露谎言的一个有利工具。

孙文广:“有很多的微博是吧,大家可以来纠正啊。就是微博是一种纠错、纠偏、辟谣的一种很有力的手段啊。”

今年9月,新浪首席执行官曹国伟说,公司正在针对新浪微博开发管控系统,以降低这个极具人气的社交媒体工具,对所谓的社会稳定构成风险。

一些微博用户抱怨新浪微博随意删除他们的言论,有人表示将拒绝使用新浪微博。

知名传媒人北风在推特上号召,发布新浪审核工作人员他们的个人信息,给他们压力,让他们认识现在从事的工作就是一种耻辱,是对历史和人民的犯罪。

知名撰稿人宋石男发表一篇题为“我为什么离开新浪微博”的文章,表示新浪微博是“创造性的限制谈话内容”,他们使用方法无非四种:删帖、屏蔽贴、禁言及删ID。

赵连海在新浪微博也经常遭删帖及封闭账户,他说已不再使用新浪。

赵连海:“新浪目前有所谓的辟谣,什么这样那样的,实际上很多的时候是把有很多真实的事情,他们去说成是假的,很多人就说嘛,真正的造谣者才是他们。中共在很多事情上颠倒黑白,颠倒是非,实际上普通民众都已经看到了。”

赵连海表示,希望腾迅公司三思。他说,今天扼杀言论于无形之中,就是为独裁专制助纣为虐。

新唐人记者李韵、郭敬采访报导。

A New Method To Control Tencent’s Microblog

Tencent CEO and president, Ma Huateng, said that
in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) requests and that of the public,
Tencent is developing a new method to monitor blogger’s
Internet posts on Tencent’s microblog.
Analysts say that this is an excuse to defend the CCP’s
authoritarian dictatorship.

On October 31, at the Tech Crunch Disrupt Conference,
Tencent CEO Ma Huateng said that
a new method is under development
to monitor Tencent’s microblog posts.
He claimed that false information posted on microblogs is
a touchy issue, for netizens might believe what they hear.

Former professor at Shandong University, Sun Wenguang,
commented that Ma Huateng is defending the CCP.

Sun Wenguang: “The false information he is referring to
is the CCP authorities’ evildoings uncovered by civilians.
His claims actually defend and support the CCP authorities.

In reality, many times its officials who deliberately release
rumors and spread fabricated news.
The public is genuinely eager to know the truth.”

Zhao Lianhai, a former media professional and founder of
“Home for the Kidney Stone Babies" (Jieshibaobao.com) is one of Tencent’s microblog users.
He believes that Ma’s claims are simply excuses
designed to strangle people’s right to speak.

Zhao Lianhai: “At present, we generally accept Tencent’s
microblog, for it still adheres to some principles.
But if Ma Huateng goes so far as to intentionally control
the microblog, then we all have to express our opposing views to Tencent, and to all those who support Ma.”

Zhao Lianhai said that the practice of using various excuses
and means to strangle people’s right to speak should be condemned and despised.
He expected more people to stand up to resist such behavior.

Sun Wenguang stressed that the microblog itself is
a powerful tool to expose lies.

Sun Wenguang: “There are many microblogs.
So we all can utilize them to correct things.
The mircroblog itself is a very powerful means to correct,
rectify, and refute rumors.”

This September, Sina CEO, Charles Cao, said that
Sina is developing a system that will help control its microblog environment.
He claims that this new system will reduce risks
associated with his wildly popular social media tool,
in order to promote so-called social stability.

Some Sina microblog users complained that their posts were
randomly deleted.
Some netizens said that they refuse to use Sina’s microblog.

A renown media professional, Bei Feng,
appealed to Facebook users saying that
netizens are releasing personal information
on Sina’s censor staff in order to exert pressure on them,
and to help them realize that what they do is shameful
and that they are committing crimes against history and humanity.

Song Shinan, a renowned writer, published an article titled
“Why I left Sina’s microblog?"
He revealed that Sina’s microblog is “creatively limiting remarks”
by using methods like deleting posts, block posts,
forbidding certain postings, and deleting users’ IDs.

Zhao Lianhai had many of his Sina posts deleted
and eventually, his account was closed.
He said that he would not use Sina any more.

Zhao Lianhai: “Sina’s claim that it needs to refute rumors
on its microbog, among other claims, is simply not true.
Actually, many people believe that the rumors they say
they need to refute, were precisely started by them.
In reality, the public has witnessed how the CCP distorts
the facts and has turned the facts upside down.”

Zhao Lianhai expected that Tencent would think twice.

He said that Tencent was stifling people’s speech,
which is the same thing as holding a candle to the authoritarian dictatorship.

NTD reporter Li Yun and Guo Jing

相关文章
评论