【新唐人2011年3月8日讯】每年中共两会，都有民众挖掘各地代表的“雷人提案”。不过今年，一位记者在微博透露，中共政协委员刘永好给参加他提案发布会的记者发了“红包”。 此后，记者被要求删除微博信息，并收到礼物。虽然官方严格控制两会的报导，但仍然有隐晦的爆料，和民间失望的声音在微博上透露出来。
日前，中共政协委员、四川“新希望集团”董事长、福布斯中国富豪榜的首富刘永好在北京举办了两会“提案”的发布会。据《经济观察报》区域部记者陈勇在个人微博上透露，刘永好给与会记者发了“红包”，让他们发了一笔“小横财”。
这本来是一则潜规则的事件，立刻在新闻圈引起了众多关注。事后活动的组织者——“新希望集团”媒体工作负责人连续发出7条微博，声称红包是给与会的记者100到200元不等的交通费报销。
但陈勇3月6号在微博上透露，他因爆料红包事件后，受到不少压力。刘永好旗下的“新希望”公司的公关负责人通过报社同事约见陈勇，进行“沟通”，并送他一份医用的“口腔清洁器”。
陈勇在微博上总结写到：“两会发红包事件感想，这年头，政协委员是惹不起的，特别是有钱的，人家不仅认识你，还认识领导，最牛的还有幕后美化形象的财经公关。你丫要是不老实，从上到下都可以整你，最坏还可以送你口腔清洁器。”
网友们将这份礼物解读为：“刘永好希望陈勇能把‘嘴巴洗干净’”。
今年中共官方对两会报导的限制更多了，政治改革、“雷人提案”等都是不能提及的话题，甚至对“刘翔无提案”也被要求限制报导。
但微博上仍然有着零星隐晦的爆料。例如“今天在2会现场，听到一个雷人消息，据说后天的某领导的报告，将把法律体系和政权捆绑，建立一个万年不倒的和谐江山。”或 “当各类两会专题不断报导某某部长、省长被记者围追堵截时，一边感觉到民众对信息的饥渴，一边为两会的娱乐式报导感到尴尬。”
或者：“每年两会是北京‘奢侈品’销售的高峰。有经验的售货员都知道哪些产品最适合送礼：（也就是）价值高而且明显，但产品本身要低调，不显眼。”。
另一方面，民间针对两会的声音也在微博上体现。有人发照片揭露两会期间城管的暴力执法，而引发网友怒责“两会的意义还何在，社会怎样和谐，人民何谈尊严！”
还有高中生写“如果我是两会代表”，内容哭诉学校滥收费已经到了无法承受的地步。有网友感叹说“开了（两会）后能改变些啥呢？起得了作用吗？还是只是开”两会“而已呢？”
新唐人记者尚燕、周昕屹综合报导。
Reporters Bribed for Proposal from CCP’s Meetings
CCP’s Congress and Political Consultative
meetings generate shocking news every year.
A reporter said in microblog that Liu Yonghao,
a Political Consultative member,
gave reporters “red envelopes” with money
at a press conference publicizing his proposals.
Later, he was asked to remove the post.
But voices of disappointment still came out.
Liu Yonghao, a corporate CEO, a super-rich
Political Consultative member, held a presser
to publicize his proposals for the “two meetings.”
Reporter Chen Yong exposed on Microblog that
Liu distributed red envelopes with money to reporters.
The post attracted wide media attention.
The presser organizer New Hope Group put out
seven posts on Microblog, saying the money was to
cover transportation cost.
Chen Yong said he faced much pressure
after exposing the “Red Envelope” incident.
New Hope asked to meet with him and
gave him a medical “oral hygiene applier.”
Chen wrote on Microblog: The Red Envelope incident
showed the rich CCP officials cannot be challenged.
They know your boss and have image-building PRs.
If you make trouble, they’ll make your life miserable;
they even give you “oral hygiene applier.”
Net users commented:
Liu Yonghao wants so much for Chen Yong to
“wash his mouth clean.”
The CCP imposed many limits to the reporting on
the two meetings, including topics on political reform,
“shocking proposals.” Reporters are required not to
mention that Athlete Liu Xiang didn’t have a proposal.
Some made subtle references on Microblog:
A “shocking” news was heard at the two meetings
in two days a leader will tie together law and politics
to build a harmonious society to last for 10,000 years;
certain ministers from the two meetings were chased
by reporters and embarrassed by the meetings’ reports.
Another blog post:
CCP’s meetings bring peak sale in luxuries, and
experienced salesperson know what fit for gifts:
price is high but the items should not stand out.
Someone posted a photo on Microblog on violence
in urban control during the CCP’s two meetings.
A blogger replied:
What use do the CCP’s meetings have?
How can society be harmonious and
people be dignified?
One high-school student wrote an article
detailing school’s excessive charge on fees.
Bloggers responded with pessimism:
Can the two meetings bring any changes to this?
Or were they simply empty meetings?
NTD Reporters Shang Yan and Zhou Xinyi
