【禁闻】社科院帮腔 中共东施效颦显愚陋

【新唐人2013年08月12日讯】中共喉舌近期连续发表文章,诋毁宪政并为中共一党专制打气,声称要“坚定制度自信”。“中国社科院”甚至专门为此出台一份问卷调查报告,与当局说法相呼应。但在外界看来,这些举措反而凸显中共在危机重重之下,已经处于失魂状态,就像“东施效颦”典故里的丑女东施,一味的模仿美女西施,更加显得愚蠢和丑陋。下面请看报导。

8月9号,中共中央机关报《人民日报》再次发表署名文章《为什么我们有制度自信》,鼓吹所谓的“中国特色社会主义”。作者中共广东省委党校教授郑志国在文章中以经济发展为由,为中共一党专制进行辩护,声称:目前出现的社会问题不能归咎于现行制度。

中国宪政学者陈永苗:“所谓的经济发展,不过是过去100年的经济积累、工业积累在30年之内的严重透支,和将来几十年子孙后代的发展空间的严重透支。实际上就是一个败家子把祖宗留下的家产跟子孙的田地全部给卖了。”

同样是8月9号,中国社会科学院在北京举行发布会,公布了社科院“政治学研究所”进行的第一次全国性“中国公民政治文化”问卷的调查结果。报告宣称:在10个省的6159名被调查者中,有近7成对中共和现行政策表示认同。

大陆专栏政论作家朱建国:“社科院本来就是官方的一个喉舌。那么官方现在在反宪政、提倡对现有的专制‘三自信’(道路自信、理论自信、制度自信)的背景下,指令他们做一些虚假的调查,那是很自然的。”

大陆专栏政论作家朱建国分析指出,现在的调查普遍采用百分制,5分制早已被取消,因为百分制更精确。但这个调查问卷仍然采用5分制,仅从这一点就可看出当局的心虚与不自信。

此外也有学者指出,中共出台这样的调查问卷,为了达到宣传部门需要的结果,被调查者往往都是经过精心挑选的,不可能去找底层老百姓、访民或者是被迫害的人来接受调查。

陈永苗:“在萨达姆倒台之前,萨达姆每次选举的得票率都是百分之百的。”

去年(2012年)11月,中共在18大政治报告中号称,全党要坚定“道路自信、理论自信、制度自信”,这一说法被外界称为所谓的“三自信”。随后,中共喉舌不断大造舆论,对民主宪政等理念进行抨击,并明确表白:“中国梦”就是保持中共一党专制基础上的“中国梦”。

最近,大陆多地更出现了所谓的“中国梦”系列广告,“社会主义好”、“共产党好”等露骨宣传标语惊现街头。民众吐槽说,这让人感觉又回到了“文革”时期。

陈永苗:“现在党内高层、以及党内理论口、宣传口的这些人,他现在是处于这种欺人自欺、自欺欺人的状态,是属于一种迷魂的状态。”

中国宪政学者陈永苗向《新唐人》表示,中共目前的舆论宣传是一种失去魂魄的状态,到底相信什么,当局自己都搞不清楚。

陈永苗:“西施和东施之间美貌的差距要差得很远,那东施也可以举其中的一点来效颦,眉毛也跟你搞得一样,那我也是赶上你西施的,我跟你西施是齐名的。就像是‘中国梦’和美国梦,可以有相通的道路一样。”

陈永苗还强调,“中国社科院”本身就是中共的一个机构,不可能进行客观的调查,所有以“社科院”名义公布的所谓调查结果大多数都是假的、作弊的。

采访/朱智善 编辑/李谦 后制/周天

Chinese Regime ‘Imitates Beauty’, But Has Opposite Effect

A series of articles have appeared on Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) state controlled media.
They target constitutionalism, promote one-party rule,
and claim to have confidence in the CCP political system.
Meanwhile, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(CASS) released questionnaire results supporting this.
Observers comment that these initiatives have
only highlighted the crises that the CCP is facing.
The party has no soul, but blindly tries to
create external appearances to justify itself.
In reality, however, this has the opposite
effect. Let’s take a look at our news.

On August 9, CCP state controlled
People’s Daily, published a commentary.
It was discussing “why the CCP
has confidence in its political system.”
It advocated “socialism with Chinese characteristics.”

The author, Zheng Zhiguo, is a professor at the Party
School of Guangdong Provincial CCP Committee.
On the grounds of economic development,
Zheng defends CCP one-party dictatorship.
He argues that the existing political system
cannot be blamed for current social problems.

Chen Miao, Constitutional scholar, China:

“The alleged economic development is actually
a 30-year overdraft from the previous 100-year
accumulation in the economy and industry.
It has also seriously overdrawn from the
development space of future generations.
This is, in effect, a black sheep who has
sold off all it’s land left by it’s ancestors.”

On the same day, the CASS released questionnaire results.
It is the first nationwide poll on citizens political awareness.
The report claims that among 6,159 respondents
from 10 Provinces, nearly 70% of them say they
embrace the CCP, and its current political system.

Zhu Jianguo, Columnist, China: “The
CASS itself is one of the CCP mouthpieces.
Now the CCP has argued against constitutionalism.

It has promoted for people to have confidence
for its road, ideology and political system.
In this context, it’s no surprise that the poll was
conducted to be in favor of the CCP’s wishes.”

Zhu Jianguo explains that nowadays, surveys are
commonly graded on a 0-to-100 scale, due to precision.
The previous 5-point grading scale has been abolished,
but it was still used in this CASS questionnaire.
From this point, we can see the
CCP is timid, lacking confidence.

Some scholars indicate that the survey
was released to serve as propaganda.
It was conducted among selective respondents, instead
of ordinary citizens, petitioners or persecuted groups.

Chen Yongmiao: “Before Saddam was
toppled, he always won 100% of the votes.”

In November 2012, the 18th CCP Congress
report called on all the party members
to adhere to the ‘Three Confidences’.
That is, to have confidence in taking the CCP
path, in it’s ideology and in it’s political system.
Since then, overwhelmingly, CCP official media
has attacked the ideas of constitutionalism.
Official media have made it clear that the “China
Dream" is founded on CCP one-party rule.

Recently, many street advertising boards promoting
socialism, and the CCP, have appeared nationwide.
Some netizens have complained that this seems
to be reviving the era of the ‘Cultural Revolution’.

Chen Yongmiao: “Currently, high-level CCP
officials, and those in charge of CCP ideology
and propaganda, are mired in self-deception.”

Chen Yongmiao notes that so far, the
CCP has lost its soul in propaganda.
What is its real belief? The CCP
itself doesn’t know anymore.

Chen Yongmiao:
“A story goes that in ancient China, Xi Shi’s beauty
and Dong Shi’s ugliness could in no way compare.
Dong Shi tried to use make-up to draw eyebrows like
Xi Shi, and thought she could be as beautiful as Xi Shi.
Similarly, there may exist superficial similarities
between the ‘China dream’ and the ‘American
dream’, but the CCP nevertheless remains ugly.”

Chen Yongmiao also stresses that
the CASS is a state run organization.
It cannot conduct objective surveys.

According to Chen, survey results released
under the name of the CASS are unreliable.

相关文章
评论