【新唐人2011年3月11日讯】中共两会代表的提案，一直是历届两会的焦点，每年都会有网友总结当年的“雷人提案”，作为笑料。今年也不例外，会议还没有结束，代表们的“雷人提案”就已经在网上广为流传了。评论认为，对中国老百姓而言，中共两会的娱乐化，可能是它的唯一价值。
被称为“权贵盛宴”的中共两会正在进行中，民众对会议的众多议题是否能够改善民生，早已不抱希望。他们参与“两会”的方式，就是挖掘代表们的“雷人提案”或“雷人雷语”取乐。
到目前为止，网友汇总的2011年两会最“雷人提案”和“雷人雷语"有：
中共全国政协委员、北京中华民族博物馆馆长王平提出的：“不应该鼓励农村的孩子去上大学”。
中共政协委员、招商银行行长马蔚华说的：“房价上涨是因为老百姓手中的钱太多。”
中共政协委员、上海紫江集团有限公司党委书记沈雯提出：提高贫困线彰显了政府实事求是的态度，和政策的人道主义关怀，会让我们更有面子。
中共人大代表、文艺工作者李丹阳提议：“加强互联网的微博管理刻不容缓！”
浙江吉利汽车董事长李书福说的：“企业一定要听党的话，两会提案跟着中央政策走”
北京作家张耀杰：“我们就像看戏，我们在微博上一个个的把某些政协委员和人大代表拿出来示众，包括李丹阳、韩红，拿他们作为反面教材在调侃。”
大陆网友认为，这些“两会提案”或言论，大多与公众期待不符，也不能代表当前社会公众的普遍诉求，因此老百姓根本不关心。
浙江大学法学工作者庄道鹤：“这是一批非民选的钦点的代表在那里关起门来自娱自乐，他们只是在一个短时间内做一下政治秀吧，表演表演。”
香港《明报》报导说，两会上的“雷人”话语已经成为一剂娱乐调料。
时事评论员横河认为，娱乐化的倾向，很可能是两会唯一的价值。他表示：中共花那么多纳税人的钱办这个劳民伤财的两会，中共、两会代表、安全部门、公安部门都得到了巨大的好处。
横河：“出钱的老百姓什么也没得到，还要被抓、被关、被打，因此我觉得两会既然老百姓出了钱，他能够娱乐娱乐有什么不可以呢？事实上把两会作为娱乐，也不仅仅是民间的这种作法，其实当官也在这么做，你像把毛新宇那样的少将代表推出来，不也是为了给人娱乐吗？”
新唐人记者周玉林、薛莉综合报导。
=====
“Ridiculous Motions” on Two Meetings Become Laughing Stocks
Representatives’ have been the focal point of
the CCP’s annual “Two Meetings”.
This year, some “ridiculous motions” have been
circulated online even before the Two Meetings end.
Analysts commented, the Two Meetings’ sole value
to Chinese folks is probably being laughing stocks.
Two Meetings (aka “feast of the powerful”) are
in full swing, but the public have lost their faith
in the motions to improve their welfare.
Instead, their only means of participation is to
excavate the meetings’ “ridiculous motions” for fun.
The most “ridiculous motions” in 2011
collected by netizens include:
Wang Ping, director of Chinese Ethnic Museum:
“Rural children should not be encouraged
to go to college.”
Ma Weihua, president of China Merchants Bank:
“Housing prices soar because
there is too much money in people’s hands.”
Shen Wen, Party secretary of Shanghai Zijiang Group:
“Raising the poverty line embodies the government’s
realistic attitude and humanitarianism,
which will make us look good.”
Li Danyang, an art and entertainment professional:
“It is imperative to strengthen micro-blog management!”
Li Shufu, president of Geely Automobiles in Zhejiang:
“Enterprises must obey the Party;
motions must follow Central Government’s policies.”
Beijing-based writer Zhang Yaojie:
We are like watching a drama.
We expose the reps’ remarks on the micro-blogs,
using them as negative examples for laughter.
Netizens believe, the motions at the Two Meetings
are different from the public expectation,
neither do they reflect the public demand.
So the common folks don’t care about them at all.
Zhuan Daohe, a law professional in Zhejiang Univ.:
A bunch of un-elected, government-appointed reps
are entertaining themselves behind closed doors.
They are just performing a political show,
for a little while.
Hong Kong’s Ming Pao reported that
these ridiculous motions had become laughing stocks.
Current affairs commentator Heng He said,
the meetings’ entertainment use may be
their only value. The CCP spent a lot of
taxpayers’ money on the meetings. The CCP regime,
the reps, police and security bureaus
have all benefited tremendously from this.
Heng He: Taxpayers didn’t get anything.
They are even arrested, detained and beaten.
As people pay for the meetings’ cost,
why couldn’t they take them as a joke and make fun?
In fact, the officials take the meetings as a joke, too.
An idiot like Mao Xinyu, Mao’s grandson, was made
a lieutenant general and a representative.
Isn’t it a joke?
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin and Xue Li.
