【新唐人2011年3月10日讯】第三次参加两会的明星代表刘翔今年玩起了“裸会”，虽然官方要求对此事报导要低调，但是老百姓仍然给予了极大的关注。有90多位中国公民3月5号联合发表建议书，呼吁撤销像刘翔这样的政协委员，不过也有网友呼吁向他学习。到底怎么回事呢？请看报导。
什么是“裸会”？这个新名词指的是：参加中共两会的代表和委员“不提交提案”的行为。作为全国政协委员， 体育明星刘翔去年两会期间曾准备过两个提案。但今年，他“裸会”了。
今年中共官方对两会报导的限制多多，“政治改革”不能提，“雷人提案”不能提，“明星代表”不能追，当然，刘翔的“裸会”也被要求“限制报导”。
尽管如此，刘翔的 “裸会” 还是引起了众怒。3月5号，原湖北潜江市人大代表姚立法与各地90多位公民，联名在海外中文《博讯》网上发表“致全国政协十一届四次会议建议书”，呼吁撤销刘翔等人的政协委员资格。
《腾迅》博客上有人发文““裸会”行为让刘翔不配当政协委员”，引用了《南国都市报》讽刺“裸会”的漫画。
微博上很多人将刘翔封为 “打酱油委员”，一名网友（“本是那散淡的仙”）写道：“说起两会代表呢，他们真能代表人民吗？鄙人认为有些代表是奔着为老百姓解决事实去的，而有的是捣乱去了，还有的就是去打酱油，并令我厌恶而去的，例如刘翔。”
姚立法等人的建议书还列举了历年两会期间，类似刘翔这样“混饭吃”的一些政协委员的雷人提案和发言。比如，地产500强的百步亭集团董事局主席茅永红说：“老百姓没有买房能力，就不要来埋怨政府、社会和开发商。房价不能打压，而且也打不下去”。
不过，刘翔的“裸会”，倒也并非一面倒的只捱了拳头。有网友（“栀子花开的夏日”）说：“听到那么多的委员、代表的妖言，突然想起刘翔委员的无提案，很感动。如果他也整些妖言出来，叫万千粉丝情何以堪。”
网友“肖锋”在刘翔的照片上方写“他们假装开会，我们假装关心。到目前为止，本届两会出现过响当当的提案吗？”
姚立法等在建议书中提出，徐友渔、秦永敏、艾未未、胡星斗等人能更好的履行政协委员的职能，因此推荐他们参加全国政协会议。不过姚立法表示，他因为发表这封建议书，以及“茉莉花集会”两方面的原因，他的人身自由遭到了限制。
新唐人记者尚燕、孙宁综合报导。
Former Olympic champion in the 110-meter hurdles
Liu Xiang attended the two meetings as a delegate
to the CPPCC. But he had submitted no proposals.
Authorities want media to keep a low key on it.
Still, it caught people’s attention. On March 5,
90 Chinese citizens jointly filed a statement,
calling to disqualify Liu as a CPPCC member.
But some netizens suggest following his example.
Let’s take a look at the story.
As CPPCC member, Liu Xiang had prepared
two proposals in last year’s “two meetings.”
But this year, he had none.
He was blamed for coming to the meeting “naked.”
The Communist Party set many restrictions to
the media coverage of the two meetings.
Media are not supposed to mention “political reform”,
“the Lei (shocking) proposals,” or to follow around
the celebrity representatives.
Liu Xiang’s “naked attendance” is also a taboo.
People were irritated by his shirking responsibilities.
On March 5, former representative of Hubei Province,
Yao Lifa, along with 90 local residents, sent a statement
to overseas’ boxun.com, calling the CPPCC to revoke
Liu Xiang’s membership.
Some blogs said, Liu Xiang came to the meetings
without any proposal.
This disqualifies him from being a member of CPPCC.
The blog used a cartoon to illustrate the point.
Many called Liu Xiang a rep “to purchase soy sauce,”
meaning someone who only minds his own business.
Netizens said, “Can the reps really represent people?
Some went there to help people solving problems.
Some are there just to make trouble.
And others are there ‘to purchase soy sauce,’
which drives me away in disgust, like Liu Xiang. ”
Yao Lifa gave examples of CPPCC members who
gave shockingly ridiculous proposals and remarks
during the previous “two meetings”. For example,
Chairman of the real estate 500 Mao Yonghong said,
“If people don’t have the purchase power for houses,
Don’t blame the government or developers.
The housing price cannot be suppressed.”
Not all criticized Liu Xiang for his “vase” role.
A netizen said, “Having heard enough of
the wicked remarks from the representatives,
I am so moved by Liu Xiang’s ‘zero proposal.’
If he produced similar wicked remarks, how could
tens of thousands of fans like us bear it? ”
Another netizen wrote on Liu’s photo,
“They pretend to have meeting.
And we pretend to care.
But so far, are there any meaningful proposals?”
Yao Lifa suggested in his statement, people like
Xu Youyu, Qin Yongmin, Ai Weiwei, and Hu Xingdou
could do a better job as CPPCC members.
He recommended having them in the meetings.
Yao also said, due to the Jasmine gatherings and his
publishing the statement, his freedom was restricted.
NTD reporters Shang Yan and Sun Ning
