【新唐人2011年4月4日讯】北京邮电大学2011届研究生毕业典礼，日前在北邮主楼前举行。有中国“网络长城——防火墙之父”称号的方滨兴作为校长，他发表的讲话，被评为官腔十足，让毕业典礼成为了党性教育，令在场的毕业生反感。同时这位被称为“网民公敌”的发言，也再一次引来了广大网友的谩骂。
方滨兴发言，要求毕业生要常怀爱国之心，常抒爱国之情。他说，“就是要用你们的聪明才智让国家更加强大”；“就是要象爱护眼球一样，维护社会的稳定。”这篇被认为党文化和官腔味十足的演讲，不久就流传到网上，并引发广大网友的热议和嘲讽。
方滨兴将最近一段时间里的中东局势和中国的“茉莉花革命”，向北邮的毕业生做出了自己的解读。他声称，北非与中东的政局动乱，勾引出反华势力的极大期待…等。
他说，境外的民运分子，轻松的坐在家里，一心想的就是如何仅凭手指敲着键盘，就利用互联网的放大效应来搞乱中国。
北邮有学生表示：作为一名坐在前排无法靠后的学生来说，当时也无话可说，那会儿就连党委书记都开始笑了……
方滨兴的讲话被上传到网上后，更是引起了众多网友的反弹。
网友小吴向《自由亚洲电台》表示，基本上都是谬论。他也可以敲敲手指头，向美国、欧洲这些国家输出点什么革命、动荡什么的，他有这个本事就可以去搞啊。而且就算美国有人不满的话，上街上去喊几下，这根本是很正常的事情，怎么可能像中共的维稳这么紧张呢。他还说到利比亚，他为什么不说说埃及、突尼斯已经和平的解决了这事情？
另一名网友（qizhuhuang）表示，这个校长对当今局势的了解犹如井底之蛙，如果美国没有责任心，大可在推翻萨达姆政权之后直接撤军，海外驻军成本多高？“爱国的破布”只能用来忽悠不能自由获取信息的人。
有网友更是直接了当的说：“少拿你那一套歪理糊弄我们！”
在去年底，这位“网民公敌”就曾被大陆网友围剿。他受邀在新浪微博上开设账号，但只有和CCTV主持人——敬一丹，打了一声招呼后，几千条网民的留言——质疑和谩骂的声浪就如潮水般涌来，方滨兴被迫关闭微博。
另外，与方滨兴要求学生维护党和国家荣誉类似的情况，山西省国有资产监督管理委员会日前下发通知，决定发动省属企业团员青年展开“网路红哨兵”活动。“红哨兵”们将收集、上报网上所谓的“不良言论”，以“红”压“黑”，企图维护国家、山西及国企的良好形象。
山西维权人士邓太清：“这是一种倒退的做法，就是说如果国有企业的领导人确实没有问题，那不用组织反击，把事实摆出来就行了，如果你有这个方面的问题，再反击也是虚假的，事实在那摆着呢，所以这个东西就是一种舆论导向，搞这个舆论，混淆是非。”
邓太清向《自由亚洲电台》表示，政府信誉破产以后，说不定哪个时候一个信息的发布，就导致社会的动荡甚至是崩溃。
新唐人记者子琦、葛雷综合报导。
“Even the Party Secretary Was Laughing”
Recently commencement of Beijing University’s
Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT) School
was held in front of the main building.
The address of Fang Binxing, BUPT’s president,
dubbed as the “Father of China’s Great Firewall"
and “Enemy of netizens”, was criticized
as bureaucratic and promoting party education,
repelling both students and netizens alike.
Fang said, that students should always be patriotic.
Fang: “Use your wisdom to strengthen the country,
…guard stability as you will guard your eyes.”
This party-like speech in a bureaucratic style
has spread throughout the internet and it was
widely discussed and criticized by netizens.
Fang talked to students about the recent
Jasmine unrests in the Middle East and China.
He claimed that the political unrests in North Africa
and Middle East resulted in an anti-China force rise.
He said that the intention of civil rights members
overseas is to use internet’s amplifying effect
to harass China with keyboard strokes from home.
A student at BUPT said, “I sat in the front row
and couldn’t move back. I felt speechless then
and even the party secretary was laughing."
Fang’s speech was uploaded on the internet
and caused strong reactions from netizens.
One netizen, Xiao Wu, told Radio Free Asia:
“Nonsense. Fang could also tap his keyboard
and export revolutions and unrests to America
or Europe. He is free to do so as long as he
is capable of it. Also, it is such a common thing
for Americans to shout on the streets and express
their complaints, but no government would be
as sensitive as the CCP is. Fang talked about Libya.
But why didn’t he talk about Egypt or Tunisia,
which have peacefully solved the political unrests?”
Another netizen, Qizhuhuang, said: “This president
knows almost nothing about the current situation.
If America is irresponsible, it could’ve just withdrawn
its troops after the overthrow of Saddam’s regime,
considering the high cost of overseas troops.
The “rag of patriotism" can only fool those
without access to free information.”
Some netizens even exclaimed:
“Don’t try to fool us with such nonsense!”
Late last year Fang was again attacked by netizens.
He was invited to open a SINA microblog account.
but he was only able to say “Hi" to the CCTV MC,
Jing Yidan, when thousands of questions, messages
and criticism flooded in. Fang closed his microblog.
Similar to Fang’s words about loyalty to the party,
the Shanxi State Assets Regulatory Commission
recently issued a notice, calling on youth
in provincial corporations to become “red sentinels”,
and collect and report “harmful speech” on the net,
to maintain the good image of the country,
the province and the nationalized enterprises.
A civil rights member in Shanxi, Deng Taiqing, said:
“It is going back. If there are no problems with
the leaders of nationalized enterprises, they could
present the facts and don’t need to organize
a counterattack. But if they have problems,
the counterattack won’t be convincing
because it is against the fact.
Therefore, this measure is nothing but manipulating
public opinion to confront right with wrong.”
Deng told Radio Free Asia,
that after the government’s credibility collapses,
a piece of information could lead to unrests
or even to the fall of the entire communist regime.
NTD reporters Wang Ziqi and Ge Lei.
