【禁闻】危机重重 中共再释清党信号

【新唐人2013年02月18日讯】中国大陆在中共长期一党专政下,社会矛盾日益加重、民怨沸腾、抗暴事件此起彼伏。近年来,更有上亿民众抛弃中共、融入“三退大潮”,纷纷退出共产党、共青团和少先队。中共为了应对前所未有的生存危机,最近不断对外释放“清党”信号,声称要严格控制党员数量、将部分党员清除出党。下面请看报导。

大陆官媒《新华社》下属的《瞭望》周刊最近披露,中共中央政治局在一月召开的会议中,要求强化党员管理、及时处置不合格党员。

《瞭望》引述中共“中央党校”教授辛呜的话说,不合格党员导致中共的“战争力”不断下滑。辛呜号称,共产党不是“政治俱乐部”,入党对像的思想信仰和阶级立场必须符合中共意志。

报导说,中国社科院曾于2010年对党员规模做过调研,报告显示,中共每一次大规模发展党员都导致党员标准降低。参与调研的社科院党建与党史研究室主任陈志刚提出,中共应严格党规,排查各类“不合格”党员清除出党。

对此,时事评论员汪北稷对《新唐人》表示,中共排查所谓“不合格”党员,一方面是应对声势日益浩大的“退党、退团、退队”运动所带来的巨大冲击,另一方面也是要把中共内部不听话的、不遵守潜规则的党员清除出去,保持中共所谓的“纯洁性”。

时事评论员汪北稷:“他们前任的一个地方高官王立军(前重庆副市长)说的挺精辟,就是:听招呼、懂大局、讲政治。如果一旦正直了、同情人民了、有忏悔心了,一旦认识到中共是一个腐朽没落的反人类组织了,这就不合格了、不‘纯洁’了。”

汪北稷指出,“共产主义并不能称为一种信仰”。因为它没有受到人民自发的信任与尊重,也没有一个平和的、正常的、传承的信仰特征。

汪北稷:“它(共产主义)就是放在上面的一个口号。然后通过它严厉的组织、军事上的、警察的、公权力独裁手段的支持下,对中国大陆社会进行一种无孔不入的控制。”

汪北稷认为,习近平把女儿送到西方国家学习,不是送去“中共党校”,是因为他们根本不相信共产主义。而中共所谓的“信仰”,只是独裁分赃机制对人民欺压剥削的特殊方式。

汪北稷:“共产党所说的‘信仰’,他们自己一个都不信。从以前的毛泽东到现在的习近平,没有一个真正信仰它所提出的共产主义。这是百分之百的,眼见的事实。”

上个月17号,“中央编译局”局长衣俊卿,因为与单位多名女性淫乱,并勒索钱财,而被免职。“中央编译局”号称是全世界规模最大、级别最高的“马列主义研究机构”。而衣俊卿更被视为中共马列主义权威,并深得中共前任常委李长春和现任常委刘云山的青睐,官位迅速升到副部级。

汪北稷:“这么一个腐败透顶、荒唐透顶、笑话不断、丑闻不断的集团,它来谈信仰、来谈政治、来谈任何东西都是对合理概念的一种侮辱。”

“纽约城市大学”政治学教授夏明也表示,中共内部有两大问题:一方面,掌权的党官贪腐严重,另一方面,很多不掌权的党员对中共批评较多。

纽约城市大学政治学教授 夏明:“掌权的这批人恐怕就想对不活跃的这批人,就是对共产党‘稳定’不活跃,但是对共产党批评、或者是‘不稳定’造成一定影响的,共产党可能想剥离。”

夏明同时强调,这种剥离本身也会削弱中共所谓的“群众基础”,使中共与老百姓的对立越来越严重。

采访/刘惠 编辑/李谦 后制/葛雷

CCP s “Purging the Party”: Response to a Serious Crisis

Under the CCP’s (Chinese Communist Party) long-term
one-party dictatorship, China’s social conflicts are becoming increasingly deep.
Civilians show their anger toward the regime with uprisings,
breaking out one after another.
In recent years, over a hundred million Chinese further
joined the movement of quitting the CCP and its affiliated organizations.
As a response to this unprecedented crisis of survival,
lately the CCP continuously releases suggestions of “purging the party.”
It claims that the number of CCP members will be controlled
in a more strict way and some of them will be “cleared out.”

CCP’s official media Xinhua Agency recently published
a report in Outlook Weekly about a politburo’s meeting.
It revealed that the politburo required to enhance member
management and dispose of unqualified members in time.

The Outlook Weekly’s report cited the words of Xin Ming,
professor at the Central Party School.
Xin said, the presence of many unqualified CCP members
had led to a decline in the party’s “battle effectiveness.”
Xin Ming claimed that the CCP is not a “political club”
and the membership applicants should be consistent with the party in ideology and class attitude.

The report mentioned that the Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences (CASS) carried out a research on the number and quality of party members in 2010.

It showed that the standard of joining the party had
dropped every time massive recruitment took place.
Chen Zhigang, director of CASS’ research division for CCP’
structure and history, suggested CCP should tighten its rules as to get rid of “unqualified members” from the party.

Political commentator Wang Beiji told NTD that this CCP’s
“purging the party” initiative is its defense against the increasingly influential movement of “quit the CCP.”
On the other hand, this aims at removing internal members
who are disobedient or do not follow its hidden rules.
This can help maintain the so-called “purity” of the CCP.

Wang Beiji, political commentator: ”The former high official
of Chongqing Wang Lijun had an incisive remark on what is a qualified party member.
He said, “Follow orders, understand the overall situation,
and obey the political rules.”
If you are fair-minded, hold sympathy for civilians,
feel penitent and begin to realize
how corrupt, decadent and inhumane the CCP is,
then you are no longer ‘qualified’ or a ‘pure’ member.”

Wang Beiji remarked that communism cannot be regarded
as a normal theory since it does not win any spontaneous trust and respect from the people.
In addition, it does not have the characteristics
of being peaceful and coming into heritage naturally.

Wang Beiji: ”Communism is simply a superficial slogan.
It in fact implements all-pervasive control over society,
with its strict political organization, military power,
police group, and other authorities of dictatorship.”

Wang remarked, Xi Jinping sending his daughter to study
in western countries instead of the Central Party School shows that he does not believe in communism.
The CCP’s so-called “belief” rather refers to the special
dictatorship regime of benefiting from exploiting and suppressing ordinary people.

Wang Beiji: ”None of the CCP members believes
in what they advocate.
From the previous leader Mao Zedong to the current one
Xi Jinping, none really believes in the communist theory.
This is definitely true as everyone can see it.”

On Jan. 17, Yi Junqing, director of the Central Compilation
& Translation Bureau (CCTB) was removed from post.
He committed adulteries with females in his bureau,
and blackmailed them.
CCTB is called “the world’s largest and highest-level
research agency of Marxism-Leninism.”
Yi was regarded as an academic authority by the CCP.

He had been quickly promoted to vice-ministerial level
as he was favored by former standing member of CCP’s politburo Li Chuangchun and the incumbent Liu Yunshan.

Wang Beiji: ”The CCP is such an extremely corrupt
and ridiculous group with ceaseless scandals.
It is an insult to human common sense
for it to publicly discuss belief, politics or any other topics.”

New York City University political science professor Xia Ming
remarked that there are two serious inside CCP’ challenges.
First, the officials with power are too corrupt. Second,
CCP members with little power criticize the party too much.

Xia Ming, professor, New York City University: ”The power
group probably attempts to handle the ‘inactive’ group.
The latter refers to party members who criticize the party,
instead of working for its ‘stability’.
The CCP may want to clear them out of the organization.”

Xia Ming also remarked that such a “purge” will impair
the CCP’s popularity among the people,
and will further widen the opposition
between the party and the Chinese people.

相关文章
评论
新版即将上线。评论功能暂时关闭。请见谅!