【新唐人2012年11月28日訊】蒙古族幹部楊晶，不僅在中共十八大上進入了由七人組成的中央書記處，實現了少數民族在書記處的「零突破」，他還將分管維穩工作。中共重用少數民族幹部「維穩」少數民族，能有效嗎？請看報導。
香港《信報》的消息，新當選書記處書記的蒙古族幹部楊晶，將轉任中共中央政法委副書記、維穩領導小組副組長、社會管理綜合治理委員會副主任，協助孟建柱分管政法系統。
接近中共高層的消息人士向媒體透露，楊晶這次進入最高權力的執行機構，習近平時代解決少數民族問題手法，可能有所轉變。
雖然，楊晶實現了少數民族在書記處的「零突破」，但十六大和十七大有少數民族政治局委員，十八大則沒有少數民族的席位。
獨立評論員李善鑒：「從他（楊晶）的經歷來看的話，他並不能代表蒙古族或者中國少數民族的利益，他已經是完完全全的共產黨教育、共產黨馴化出來的一個人，所以，把他跟其他共產黨官員比較不會有任何區別。」
獨立評論員李善鑒還認為，楊晶是少數民族幹部，由他主管少數民族「維穩」工作的可能也較大。不過李善鑒指出，在中共體制下，少數民族幹部即使有權，能做的也很有限。這種安排，擺個花瓶給世界看的意味更大。
事實上，中共的少數民族政策一直不得人心。
11月25號和26號連續發生四起藏人自焚抗議事件，其中三人身亡，僅11月內，藏人自焚抗議者的人數就達到20多人。最近兩年來，中國已經發生超過80起藏人自焚事件，其中60多人喪生，但中共當局始終否認打壓藏族的宗教與文化政策，並堅稱藏人擁有宗教自由。
不過，有兩點讓外界對習近平解決西藏問題抱有希望：一是他父親習仲勳作為前副國務總理，負責西藏工作，在世時一直極力主張保障藏、回及其他少數民族的權益﹔二是習近平妻子彭麗媛是佛教徒，曾拜藏傳師父。
也有消息人士透露，習近平在去年（2011年）參加「西藏解放60週年」活動中，曾私下對一些領導幹部講，在西藏的絕大部分幹部「只懂得援藏，不懂得治藏」。
但李善鑒指出，從最近來看，政法委對待異議人士、對待藏人、法輪功等其他宗教信仰團體的打壓沒有放鬆，中共「穩定壓倒一切」的思路並沒有改變。中共未來能不能控制政法委無法無天的混亂局面，還要觀察。
另外，國務院發改委主管的《改革內參》刊物曾有署名文章指出，「穩定壓倒一切」可能「變成權力通吃的尚方寶劍」，「維穩」可能變成「積怨纍恨」。
《信報》透露，中共十八大把「一人獨大」的維穩局面，改為「三層分管」局面，也就是﹕由王岐山「領銜」、孟建柱具體負責、楊晶協管。改變了以往由「江親信」擔任政治局常委，同時兼任中央政法委書記、維穩小組組長、綜治委主任的「一人話語權」時代。
時事評論員邢天行：「從三層分管上看，至少中共它的目地是想制衡政法委的權力，也就是說，對於以前江澤民、周永康留下來的政法委獨大、第二中央的弊病，他們是看的非常清楚的，為了怕威脅到習近平這些領導人主要的位置，所以一定要把它分權。」
邢天行還指出，過去十幾年中，政法委獨大，給中國帶來了深重災難。中共目前連這種體制都不改變，只想通過適當的權力制衡，去改變已經徹底腐敗的政法委亂政，也不改變「穩定壓倒一切」的思維方式，那麼，老百姓的權益根本不可能得到保障，期待中國法制的改善也無異於癡人說夢。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/宋風 後製/王明宇
Mongolian Enters CCP Regime’s
Stability Preservation Leading Group
Mongolian Yang Jing was promoted to the 7-member
Secretariat of Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) at the 18th Party Congress.
Yang Jing became the first ethnic minority person
in history to hold a post in the Secretariat.
Reportedly, Yang Jing will be in charge of
stability preservation.
Will his promotion effectively help maintain
stability for ethnic minorities in China?
The Hong Kong Economic Journal reported on Mongolian
Yang Jing, member of Secretariat, CCP Central Committee.
Yang will take over as deputy chief of the Central Politics &
Law Commission(PLAC) of the Stability Preservation Leading Group,
and of social management, said the news report.
Sources close to CCP top-level told media that Yang Jing’s
entry into the ruling circle indicates a different way of handling minority issues under the reign of Xi Jinping.
Yang Jing became the first member of Secretariat of
the CCP Central Committee.
No ethnic minority Politburo member was produced at the
18th Party Congress, contrary to the two previous meetings.
Li Shanjian (Independent critic): “He (Yang Jing)
can’t represent the interests of the Mongolian or Chinese ethnic minorities.
His working experience shows that
he is reborn from CCP brainwashing completely.
So, there’s no difference between
he and other CCP officials."
Li Shanjian adds that as an ethnic minority cadre,
Yang Jing is likely to be in charge of “stability preservation”.
However, an ethnic minority official within the CCP system
is usually vested with limited authority.
Yang Jing’s role is more likely to be used as pretence,
Li Shanjian remarks.
In reality, the CCP’s minority policy has long been unpopular.
On November 25-26, four continuous Tibetan
self-immolations occurred in China,
with three of those taking part dying from their injuries.
In November, over 20 Tibetans set themselves
on fire to protest CCP rule.
In the last two years, China has seen over 80 Tibetan
self-immolations, causing over 60 deaths.
By contrast, the CCP authorities have consistently
denied their crackdown on Tibetan religion and culture.
The regime always asserts that
Tibetans in China possess religious freedom.
So far, two points have made the public hold out hope
for Xi Jinping to deal with Tibetan issue.
Firstly, Xi’s father Xi Zhongxun, former CCP deputy
premier in charge of Tibet, advocated to protect the interests of ethnic minorities;
Secondly, Xi Jinping’s wife, Peng Liyuan, is a Buddhist,
who is reported to worship a Tibetan master.
Informed sources have revealed Xi Jinping’s
covert comments.
In 2011, Xi Jinping attended an event held to celebrate
the 60th anniversary of the “liberation“ of Tibet.
Privately, Xi said to some leaders that the vast
majority of cadres in Tibet “only know how to aid construction in Tibet, but not how to govern it.”
Li Shanjian indicates that the PLAC’s crackdown
has continued on dissidents, the Tibetans,
Falun Gong practitioners and on other faith groups.
The Party’s policy of “stability overriding everything"
has never been changed.
The world still needs to wait and see whether
the CCP can get the PLAC’s lawlessness under control.
The in-house journal of the Development and Reform
Commission of the State Council published a commentary.
The article said that “stability overriding everything"
may be turned into “an imperial sword giving the bearer arbitrary powers”.
The “stability preservation" may finally evolve into piles of
grievances and discontent.
The Hong Kong Economic Journal said that CCP’s stability
preservation has changed from the past unipolar ruling to decentralization in three layers.
That is, Wang Qishan heads up stability preservation;
Meng Jianzhu is person in charge, Yang Jing, an assistant.
In the past, it was Jiang Zemin’s cronies who, as Politburo
Standing Committee members,
concurrently served as chiefs of the PLAC, of stability
preservation leading group and of social management.
Xing Tianxing (Critic): “Its decentralization aims to check
and balance the power of the PLAC.
That means, the new CCP top leadership knows very clearly
about the PLAC being set up as the 2nd Central Committee by Jiang Zemin and Zhou Yongkang.
So, fearing a threat to the power of Xi Jinping and
other top leaders, they now must decentralize PLAC power.”
Xing Tianxing adds that the PLAC’s hegemonic power
has brought grave disasters to the Chinese people over the past decade.
However, the CCP does not intend to remove the
rotten-to-the-core PLAC system, but only attempts to curb it with decentralization.
Nor does the regime want to change the ruling mindset of
“stability overriding everything”.
In this context, there is no way for Chinese citizens
to get their interests protected.
Nor is it possible that China’s legal system will see
any real improvement, says Xing Tianxing.
