【禁聞】兩會前 最想問溫家寶的問題

【新唐人2011年3月2日訊】中共總理溫家寶兩會前夕與網民線上交流,回答網友的問題,中共媒體稱之為“網路問政”。那麼,中國老百姓在“網路問政”上,是否提出了真正的民意?而那些沒有與溫家寶連上線的大陸民眾,他們最想問的問題又是甚麼呢?來看下面這則報導:

兩會前夕與網民線上交流,是溫家寶連續三年必做的一項固定功課。中共媒體也進行大肆宣揚報導。中共《新華網》報導聲稱,這次線上交流重點談改善民生計劃,並顯示了政府的決心。

湖北實驗農科院劉玉傑:“我認為,這是一句空話,因為那些老百姓貼近他實際需要解決的問題,根本沒有解決。”

上海訪民金女士:“既然他已經跟網民說了,關於民生的問題,可是他說的一些話跟做的一些事不符合民生的一切。我提出的問題就是很實際的問題,要吃飯要生存要安居,縮小貧富差距吧。”

北京經租房上訪戶周先生:“這種場合原來我們也去過,但我們的消息都被屏蔽了,登不出來,社會上的信息也沒有,法院也不受理,所以我們覺得提問也沒甚麼意義。”

大陸公共知識份子,專欄作家丁咚在他的博客上,也向溫家寶提出了十個問題,並在網路上流傳。

1、如何看待並解決“國民收入增長跟不上物價上漲”的問題?
2、如何看待政府加強互聯網管制、限制網民言論自由的問題?
3、能否旗幟鮮明的對卡扎菲武力殘酷鎮壓利比亞平民的非人道行為表達立場?
4、如何解決老百姓買房難這個問題?
5、《憲法》中對公民權利的有關規定已經全部實現了嗎??
6、中國的政治改革再次被無限期擱置的原因是甚麼?
7、如何看待因錄音筆事件聲名狼藉的湖北省原省長李鴻忠最近升任省委書記並擔任省人大常委會主任的問題?

此外,丁咚還提出關於反腐敗問題、人民的知情權和選舉權問題、教育的問題。

而東北民運人士趙先生也表示:“我就問他一句話就行,你們這個國家(政黨)甚麼時候能學好啊?因為它這個政府太腐敗了,一切都是在演戲,都是在欺騙國內國際的朋友們。”

丁咚認為,中共的所謂“網路問政”是一個花哨名詞。真正直面現實、聆聽公眾呼聲、解決實際問題和矛盾的少,玩花架子、做表面文章的多。因此,雖然不斷有官員公開採取這種方式改善執政形象,但並不受歡迎,公眾參與積極性也並不高。

新唐人記者常磊、李靜、黃容採訪報導

Questions to Wen Jiabao before “the Two Meetings”

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao answered questions
online to netizens, in so-called “Internet Politics".
Did the questions asked reflect real public opinion?
What are the questions from those Chinese people
who didn』t have a chance to ask him online?
Let』s take a look.

Chatting with netizens online before “Two Meetings”,
is a job Wen』s been doing for 3 consecutive years.
CCP-controlled media also trumpeted the event.
Xinhua.com reported that his online communication
focused on plans to improve people’s livelihood,
which shows the determination of the government.

Liu Yujie at Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences:
I think it is empty talk, because the real problems
in people』s life are not resolved.”

Petitioner Ms. Jin from Shanghai:
He has spoken to the netizens on people’s livelihood.
However, some of his words and actions do not
meet the requirements of people’s livelihood.
What would be my question?
It』s about practical issues.
I need to eat, to survive and to settle down. I think
the gap between rich and poor should be narrowed.

Petitioner Mr. Zhou from Beijing:
We tried to communicate with him online before,
but our messages were all blocked and not posted.
The court didn』t accept our cases.
We don』t think asking questions online is meaningful.

Chinese columnist Ding Dong asked Wen questions
on his own blog:
Upon learning that the Governor was coming to visit,

1. How to solve the problem of national income growth
not keeping up with inflation?

2. Wen』s opinion on the government』s enhanced control
of the Internet and restrictions on freedom of speech?

3. Can Wen clearly express his position on
Gaddafi』s inhumane suppression of Libyans?

4. How to solve people』s housing problem?

5. Are the civil rights stated in the Constitution realized?

6. What are the reasons for shelving indefinitely
China’s political reform?

7. What』s Wen』s opinion on the promotion of
ex-Hubei Governor Li Hongzhong, who brutally
stopped a reporter by taking away her recorder?

Ding Dong also raised questions about corruption,
people’s voting and information rights.

Activist Mr. Zhao from Northeast China:
I』ve just one question for him:
When will your Party learn to be good?
This government is too corrupt.
Everything is for show, to deceive the people
inside and outside China.

Ding Dong thinks “Internet politics" a fancy term.
Nobody in the government faces the reality
or listen to the public to solve practical problems.
They just pursue appearances and pay lip service.
Although there have been officials chatting online to
improve the Party』s image, it is not popular.
Public participation is not very active.

NTD reporters Chang Lei, Li Jing, and Huang Rong

相關文章
評論