【新唐人2013年05月06日訊】大陸微博有消息說，《財訊》傳媒集團旗下《Lens視覺》雜誌2013年4月號的調查報導《走出「馬三家」》，因為曝光了遼寧省馬三家女子勞教所女性勞教人員被酷刑虐待的問題，被暫時停刊。知情者透露，目前圍繞「馬三家」的局勢詭異，北京高層態度曖昧，各種利益集團正在角逐。
5月4號，名為「藍鯨財經記者內參」的新浪微博發佈消息說，《Lens視覺》雜誌被暫時停刊。許多網友向《Lens視覺》雜誌的微博詢問求證，但是雜誌對此保持沉默。
《Lens》聯席副主編羅昌平4月26號在微博上發消息說，《Lens》雜誌報導遼寧女子勞教一文，歷經四年採訪二十多位當事人和證人，掌握人證、物證，採取交叉認證方法落實證據成文刊發。遼寧調查組未向報導提及的當事人取證，僅通過「自查」得出報導內容「系惡意捏造和無中生有」、「歪曲事實」、「嚴重失實」的結論顯失公允。期待負責任的客觀、公開的調查。
北京媒體界一位知情人透露說，目前針對「馬三家酷刑」報導的局勢特別詭異。因為《Lens》雜誌屬於黑龍江的刊號，有關部門找到黑龍江方面，要把這個刊號中斷。而雜誌的負責人希望通過其他辦法，找到新的刊號延續這份刊物。
知情人還透露，遼寧地方當局也不敢公開宣佈他們的所謂結論，而北京對這個事情的態度很曖昧，實際上就是各種利益在角逐。
「藍鯨財經記者內參」的微博帳號也發消息說，「希望戴小京、法滿，能順利找到新的刊號，保證這本雜誌能順利出刊。」戴小京是財訊傳媒集團總裁。
北京外國語大學國際傳播研究中心主任喬木副教授表示，他也注意到停刊的消息，但是無法證實。如果確實停刊，也不意外，這樣的事情中國一直在發生。多年前《中國青年報》的副刊《冰點》就因為觀點犀利而被停刊。
對於《走出「馬三家」》這篇報導，喬木認為，從專業角度來看，這是一篇非常成功的文章。
北京外國語大學新聞學副教授喬木：「據雜誌副主編羅昌平介紹，是經過專業記者四年多的調查取證，而且採訪了不同的信源，是一個有理有據的報導。這種事情，不光是在網上，包括輿論上一直認為勞教有許多不合法不人道的地方，而且這次更主要通過這樣一個紮實的報導，我覺得是一個非常好的事，對廢除勞教是一個非常好的推動。」
喬木認為，遼寧調查組提出的報導「嚴重失實」的結論沒有說服力。喬木表示，如果要做調查，第一需要很長的時間，第二要跟當事人取證，包括與記者的溝通，但實際上都沒有去做。
喬木：「你說別人不屬實，你自己得有一個確鑿的調查，就是你要跟當事人，有沒有一些取證啊？而且你這個證據是不是多方的、多角度的來回求證，不僅僅是引用一下管教人員。特別這樣的事，調查本身要有獨立性，不能說據網上透露，說這個調查組的組長，原來就是馬三家的管理人員，也是司法局的甚麼幹部。這本身公信力就沒有。」
大陸律師滕彪近日發微博表示，國內有關馬三家的報導不是完全真實的。因為它掩蓋了2/3的更惡劣、更恐怖的真實情況。
滕彪所指的「更恐怖的真實」引發網友的關注。
有網友猜測，莫非是傳說中的活體摘除器官？還有網友表示，《美國之音》、《BBC》都關注了，據說有可能涉及到器官之類的敏感話題。
在遼寧調查報告公布後，《走出「馬三家」》的作者——記者袁淩，多次在微博上質疑調查報告的公正度。目前袁淩新浪微博帳號已經遭到刪除。
4月22號，在遼寧調查組結論出爐之後，袁淩發表聲明說：建議遼寧教養院起訴本人，雙方當庭對質，出示人證物證。若我果然造謠污蔑，盡可追究刑責。若報導屬實，也請法庭追究教養所虐待者以及包庇的司法廳官員刑責。
採訪編輯/秦雪 後制/陳建銘
Lens Magazine Suspended Over “Masanjia Article”
Some people are saying that magazine “Lens Vision” has been
suspended because it published a report “Walk out of Masanjia”.
The report disclosed that women prisoners
in Masanjia labor camp have been brutally tortured.
On May 5th a microblog called “Lanjing Financials Insider
News” posted that magazine “Lens Vision” was suspended.
Many netziens tried to confirm the news with Lens.
However the magazine remained silent.
Luo Changping, Vice President of “Lens” published
a piece on his micro-blog .
He talked about the report on women prisoners
in Liaoning labor camps.
Luo stated that it took “Lens” four years to interview
more than 20 prisoners and witness.
Then the article was completed by combining
testimonies with material evidence.
On the other hand, Laoning investigation group
never obtained any evidence.
They concluded that the Lens report is “purely fabricated”,
“distorting the truth”, “severely inconsistent with the truth”.
This is obviously unfair to Lens.
We expect a more objective and transparent investigation.
Someone from Beijing’s media circle with inside knowledge,
said the “cruel torture in Masanjia” situation is very weird.
Lens magazine is registered in Helongjiang province. A
government department asked to suspend Lens’ registration.
However, Lens might find other ways, e.g.
re-register, to save the magazine.
The person also disclosed that Liaoning investigation group
dare not reveal their “conclusion” on cruel torture in Masanjia.
Meanwhile, Beijing’s attitude toward this event
has been very ambiguous.
As a matter of fact, different factions might be
contesting for various interests.
The micro-blog “Lanjing Financials Insider News” said: “With
luck, Dai Xiaojing is able to find a new registration for Lens.”
Dai Xiaojing is President of Caixun Media Group.
Qiao Mu, Associate Professor of Beijing Foreign Language
University and Director of International Media Research Center, also noticed the news of Lens being suspended.
“It’s not surprising that the magazine has been suspended.
This happens in China every day. Years ago, “Icing Point”, from
“China’s Youth” was also closed for its sharp comments.
Qiao Mu thinks that Len’s report “Walk out of Masanjia”
is an outstanding report from a professional viewpoint.
Qiao Mu: “Based on Luo Changping, Vice Chief Editor of Lens,
it took professional reporters more than four years
to investigate and obtain various evidences.
In addition, multiple information sources have been adopted.
It’s a very solid and sound report.
Actually, it’s widely agreed that the Chinese Communist Party’s
(CCP) policy of ‘reeducation through labor’ is illegal and inhuman.
Now Lens completed such a solid report on it.
It’s a great thing to do.
It will help abolish the so-called ‘reeducation
through labor’ policy.”
Qiao Mu stated the conclusion drawn by Laoning Investigation
group that “Lens severely distorts the truth” is unconvincing.
First, it would take a longer time to investigation.
Secondly, evidence has to be obtained from the people
covered in Lens’ report, including those who did the interviews.
As a matter of fact, none of this was done by Liaoning
investigation group before they made their conclusion.
Qiao Mu: “If you are saying Lens is distorting the truth,
you have to perform a solid investigation.
Did you obtain any evidence from people involved?
Has evidence been obtained from different aspects?
You cannot just quote the words of folks who actually manage
the labor camp. The investigation has to be independent.
As disclosed from the internet, the head of the Liaoning
investigation group used to run Masanjia labor camp.
If so, there is no credibility in their conclusion.”
Teng Biao, lawyer in China, posted in his micro-blog:
“Official reports on Masanjia are inconsistent with the truth.
Many more much worse and more terrifying truths
have been concealed.”
“The more terrifying truth” stated by Teng Biao
has caused widespread attention from the internet.
Some netziens suspect “the more terrifying truth”
could be live organ harvesting.
Some people stated that both “Voice of America” and
“BBC news” have paid attention to this topic.
The sensitive topic of live organ harvesting might be proposed.
After Liaoning Investigation Group published its report,
Yuan Ling, author of “Walk out of ‘Masanjia’” questioned the creditability and fairness of the report.
Now Yuan Ling’s Sina micro-blog account has been deleted.
On April 22nd after Liaoning Investigation Group disclosed
their investigation conclusion, Yuan Ling made a statement.
He said, “I advise Liaojing Labor Camp to sue me, and then
both the labor camp and I can face each other in open court with victim testimonies and material evidence.
If I indeed distorted the truth,
I would assume the criminal liability.
However, if my report is factually accurate, the labor camps
and related officials should assume the criminal liabilities.”
