【新唐人2013年03月19日訊】有媒體報導說，當今中國，那些動不動就拿「境外敵對勢力」來說事的人，絕大多數居然是「裸官」，甚至是「大裸官」﹗如，美國佬「瓜瓜的老爸」就經常把「境外敵對勢力」掛在嘴上。而國際醫學界著名的學術期刊之一《柳葉刀》（The Lancet），也成為衛生部副部長黃潔夫嘴裡的「國際敵對勢力」。究竟怎麼回事﹖請看本臺記者的報導。
衛生部副部長黃潔夫在今年2月底的一項會議中說，「在世界上，中國是唯一系統利用死囚器官的國家」。他還說，「國際敵對勢力把這個事情擴大化，……他們對中國器官移植的所有文章持反對態度。」
據了解，國際醫學界最著名的學術期刊之一《柳葉刀》（The Lancet），2011年10月曾發表文章，希望國際社會聯合抵制中共政權將死刑犯作為器官移植供體的行為，並且呼籲對中國所謂的「同行」，有關器官移植的研究和論文「不接受、不發表、不合作」。
台灣資深中醫師胡乃文﹕「他在哪一方都講人家是敵對勢力，蔣介石的時候是敵對勢力，日本天皇是敵對勢力，哪個都是敵對勢力，所以《柳葉刀》講出真心話來了，也叫作敵對勢力。那用這個語言的時候，可以說是挑起民族上的仇恨，去仇恨《柳葉刀》，仇恨世界上一個好的雜誌……。」
《柳葉刀》拒絕了中國大陸的器官移植「同行」，一方面是因為，中共治下所謂的「死刑犯自願捐贈」其實是中共當局牟利的幌子，更重要的是，所謂「死囚器官」，無法解釋中共器官移植數量自2000年至2006年之間爆炸式的增長。
根據中共公開的數據，在1994年到1999年的六年中，中國約進行了1萬8千5百個大器官移植﹔而從2000年至2005年的六年中，進行了6萬多個大器官移植，數量暴增三倍多。
另外，根據《中國日報》報導，僅2006年一年，就進行了高達兩萬個器官移植。
中共如何在六年之間突破國際器官緊缺的瓶頸？據《明慧》網站分析，在前後兩個六年期間，中共並沒有發生死刑犯審判、槍決模式上的重大變化，也就是說，死刑犯並沒有暴增三倍。那麼，2000年至2005年期間暴增的4萬1千5百宗移植手術的器官，來自何人？
英國皇家醫學會期刊，2007年3月第一百期，以《法輪功、器官移植、大屠殺與我們自己》為題，發表了器官移植醫生Tom Treasure的文章。文章指稱﹕「最讓我恐懼的部分是，如果這是真的，是否就是我的醫生同行，那些醫生們，犯下了這些罪行。」
時事評論員藍述：「所有境外這些醫學雜誌，他們拒絕刊登來自於中國的器官移植的這些學術論文，主要的原因是因為，他們強制的摘取死刑犯的器官，強制的摘取法輪功學員的器官，他們這種不人道的行為，引起了國際社會的憤怒。這個是一個最關鍵的原因。」
時事評論員藍述表示，人類社會發展醫學的目地就是救死扶傷，治病救人，也就是人道的目地。
藍述：「任何一個通過強制的摘取他人的器官，甚至是活體器官，來進行醫學研究的，他已經完完全全站在了人道的對立面上，完完全全背離了人類醫學發展的本意。當然，人家這些本著救死扶傷、治病救人為目地的這些醫學雜誌，當然不會發表他們（中共）這種由於反人道的行為，而發展出來的所謂的醫學科技成果啦﹗」
《明慧網》認為，醫學界不願和犯下「反人類罪行」的醫學同行們為伍，但是，真正的原因是：中共威逼利誘部分醫學從業者背叛良知，與醫學界的基本道德操守相「敵對」。因此，中共才是人類良知的「敵對勢力」。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/周平 後製/李智遠
The Lancet an “Overseas Hostile Force?”
Many Chinese officials frequently criticize
“overseas hostile forces", being against China.
Media reports show, the vast majority are actually “naked
officials" whose family members have all immigrated abroad.
For example, Bo Xilai used to mention “overseas hostile forces",
yet his own son Bo Guagua studied in the U.S.
Recently The Lancet, leading journals
in international medical community,
has become a part of the “international hostile forces” in
the eyes of Huang Jiefu, Vice Minister of Health in China.
What is the reason for this? Below is NTD’s report.
China’s Vice Health Minister Huang Jiefu said
in a meeting late Feb. this year,
“In the world, China is the only country that systematically
makes use of executed prisoners’ organs.”
And that “International hostile forces exaggerate this issue,
holding antagonistic attitudes towards organ transplantation publications in China.
Oct. 2011, a most famous medical journal The Lancet,
published an article calling for an international boycott of CCP’s organ
transplantation from executed prisoners.
It also proposed not to “accept or publish articles on organ
transplantation from China or to cooperate with the researchers.”
Taiwan Senior TCM practitioner Hu Naiwen:
“They [CCP] label everyone “hostile forces”: including Chiang
Kai-shek, the Japanese emperor,
and now The Lancet, which speaks the truth about
China’s organ transplantation.
They use such languages to stir up ethnic hatred
towards The Lancet,
one of the best medical magazines in the world …”
The Lancet refused to cooperate with so-called
“colleagues” in Mainland China.
Firstly because CCP seeks profit under the guise of “death row
inmates voluntary donation" for organ transplantation;
and secondly, Chinese authorities cannot explain the explosive
growth of China’s organ transplants between 2000-2006.
China’s public data shows about 10,008 organ transplantations
from 1994 to 1999, and over 60,000 from 2000 to 2005.
The number more than tripled.
In addition, China Daily reported as many as
20,000 organ transplants in 2006 alone.
How did CCP break through the bottleneck of
international organ shortage simply within six years?
According to Minghui Website analysis, China did not
change its modes of trial and execution of criminals between the two
six-year periods.
That is to say, the number of executed prisoners did not triple.
Then what are the sources for the increased
41,500 organ transplants from 2000 to 2005?
British Royal Society of Medicine’s journal published
Tom Treasure’s article in Mar. 2007,
titled “The Falun Gong, Organ Transplantation,
the Holocaust and Ourselves.”
The article alleged: “I fear that if this is true, then the doctors,
our colleagues, have committed these crimes themselves."
Commentator Lan Shu: “All these medical journals
refuse to publish papers on organ transplantation from China
because CCP harvests organs by force from executed prisoners,
living Falun Gong practitioners.
Such inhumane behavior aroused the anger of the international
communities. This is one of the most critical reasons."
Lan Shu said the purpose of medicine is to heal the sick and
to save lives, which is a humanitarian purpose.
Lan Shu: “When they [CCP] remove people’s organs by force,
even when they are still alive, for purpose of medical research,
they have completely stood against humanitarianism,
they have completely deviated from the original intent of
medical developments.
Its only natural the international journal,
in the spirit of life-saving,
will reject CCP’s “medical achievements” obtained
through anti-humanitarian methods.”
Minghui Website reported that, when the international medical
community is unwilling to recognize these “Chinese colleagues,”
CCP coerces medical practitioners to betray their conscience to
exercise the forced organ transplantation, and to violate basic
ethics of the medical profession.
Therefore, CCP is the real “hostile force" here against
human conscience.
