【禁聞】習近平獲和平獎? 專家:不夠資格

【新唐人2013年02月23日訊】日前,有美國的媒體預測,習近平有可能因為改革勞教制度,而獲得「諾貝爾和平獎」。但有評論人士認為,勞教改革本身並沒有為促使和平、人權與幸福做出任何貢獻,因為被勞教制度迫害的最大團體——異議人士和宗教信仰人士依然還在被迫害中,沒有得到任何自由和賠償,因此完全不符合「諾貝爾和平獎」的宗旨和標準。

據美國財經媒體《國際商業時報》的中國版IBTimes報導說,有美媒預測諾貝爾委員會可能頒發諾貝爾和平獎給中共中央總書記習近平。理由是習近平推行改革詬病多年的勞教制度。這一改革被外媒稱為「引領重大法律改革的第一步」和「人權在21世紀的光榮時刻」,但外媒的這些評論,也被中國的訪民和維權人士認為「根本不了解中國勞教制度」、「不了解中國人權狀況」、「不了解習近平勞教改革目地」的表現。

時事評論員藍述:「中共即使停止了勞改制度,但也不能改變整個中國社會今天就是一個大監獄的事實,既不讓中國民眾合法得到信息,也不讓民眾有自由說話的權利,中國今天就是一個大勞改營,被中國邊界線封起來、被中共的防火牆封起來的。只有真正逃離中國社會的人,才能獲得真正意義上的自由。」

此外,曾有媒體報導,習近平推行勞教制度改革目地,並非是為了改善中國人權狀況,而是和江派激烈內鬥的結果。因為勞教所一直是江澤民、周永康、劉雲山用來迫害異己的機構和斂財系統。

資深法學專家趙遠明:「習近平實際上是要推行他的憲政,而且用廢除勞教,打擊背後支持勞教和利用勞教整治異見分子,整治不同信仰的人。」

據「維基百科」解釋,評選諾貝爾和平獎得主的宗旨是:「為促進民族團結友好、取消或裁減常備軍隊,以及為和平會議的組織和宣傳盡到最大努力或作出最大貢獻的人。」對此,有評論人士認為,勞教制度的改革完全達不到和平獎的標準。

趙遠明:「因為他這個只是一個改錯,就是你這個勞改是錯的,我給你改正過來。並沒有對人類法制建設、對中國法制建設有甚麼大的貢獻,實際上只是把錯的改正了,也就是錯的改成不錯的,不錯的就應該是正常社會的一種狀態和法制,不存在你對社會、對國家,對人民有多大貢獻的問題。」

原「中國人民公安大學」法律系講師、資深法學專家趙遠明還指出,如果習近平真的想為人權進步做出貢獻,就應該通過廢除勞教,釋放所有被勞教制度迫害的人士,尤其是其中約70%,佔最大比例的法輪功學員,以及大量訪民、異議人士等,但目前看來,習近平完全沒有這種打算。

趙遠明:「勞教制度不應該存在改革,應該就是要求他對勞教制度整個廢除,從它的立法、從它的出籠到執行都是違法的,那麼違法行為應該予以徹底糾正,那麼關押的人應該無條件釋放,過去因為勞教造成人身、財產損失的應該予以補償。」

但評論人士也表示,不排除習近平有獲得諾貝爾和平獎的可能性,但獲獎與否,說明不了中國目前的現狀。

藍述:「不管習近平最後會不會獲得和平獎,但都不能夠說明中共變成了一個人道的政黨,共產主義運動在過去全世界一個多世紀裏面,它給全人類帶來的就是瘟疫、災難和屠殺。所以諾貝爾獎無論給不給習近平,中共都是一個謊言加暴力的政黨。」

藍述指出,如果真的有一天,習近平能夠讓勞教制度迫害下的群體重獲自由,冤情得以昭雪,那麼就真正的具備了獲得諾貝爾和平獎的資格。

採訪/易如 編輯/張天宇 後製/孫寧

Will Xi win Nobel Peace Prize? Expert: he is not up to standard

Recently, some American media predicted that Xi Jinping may
win a Nobel Peace Prize for his reforming labor camp system.
Some commentators think reforming labor camp system is
no contribution to promote peace, human right and happiness.
The biggest group being persecuted by labor camp are
dissidents and religious believers.
They are still being persecuted by the Chinese Communist
Party(CCP) and haven’t gained any freedom or compensation.
So, he doesn’t match the standard of the Nobel Peace Prize.

According to report from IBYtimes (Chinese version of U.S.
economy media “International Business Times”) some U.S.
media predicted that Xi would win the Nobel Peace Prize.
The reason is Xi reformed the criticized labor camps.
Overseas media called it “the first step of considerable reform
in the law” and “glory moment of human right in 21centry”.
However, Chinese petitioners and civil right persons think the
comments from the media show they don’t understand the
Chinese labor camp system and human right situations and
the aim of Xi’s reform.

Political commentator Lan Shu: “Even if the CCP abolished labor
camp, they can’t change the truth that China is a big prison.
It neither lets the Chinese people get legal information,
nor lets them have the right to speak freely.
Today’s China is a huge labor camp, which is surrounded by
the Chinese border and internet firewall.
Only by fleeing from China, man can gain real freedom.”

Additionally, some media reported that the purpose of Xi’s
reform is not for improving the human right situation in China.
His purpose is to fight with Jiang Zemin’s group.

Labor camp is a collecting money system and organization by
which Jiang and Zhou Yongkang’s group persecuted dissidents.

Senior law expert Zhao Yuanming: “ Xi tries to promote his
Constitutionalism by abolishing the labor camp system;
And to attack those who support labor camp and utilize the
system to persecute political dissidents or different believers.”

According to Wikipedia, the purpose to choose a Nobel Peace
Prize is: “having done the most or the best work for fraternity
between nations and for the abolition or reduction of standing
armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”
So, some commentators said the reforming
labor camp systems can’t match this standard.

Zhao Yuanming: “It only corrected the wrong,
because labor camp system is wrong, now Xi corrected it.
It doesn’t make any contribution for building human
legal system and for building the Chinese legal system.
It only corrected the wrong.

It’s also to say that the wrong is corrected into the right
which the normal statement and legal system of a society.
It doesn’t make any contribution for society,
nation and people.”

Former law teacher and senior legal expert of China
People’s Public Security University, Zhao Yuanming pointed out that Xi should do some real things for the people.
If Xi really want to do some contribution to improve human
rights, he should release those who are persecuted,
especially Falun Gong practitioners who make up 70% of
detainees in labor camps. But for now, Xi hasn’t got this plan.

Zhao Yuanming: “It should not reform labor camp system,
it should abolish the whole system.
From its legislation to carry it out is illegal. Then the
illegal actions should be completely corrected.
The prisoners should be released immediately and should be
compensated for personal suffering and property damage.”

However, some commentators also said that it does not
exclude the possibility of Xi winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
No mater if he wins the prize or not, it can’t explain the
Chinese human situation.

Lan Shu: “No mater he wins the prize or not,
it can’t show the CCP has become a humanity party.
In the past one hundred years of the Communist movement,
it was a plague, disaster and massacre for all human beings.
No mater if Xi wins the prize or not,
the CCP is a party of lies and violence.”

Lan Shu pointed out, if some day Xi could make all those
persecuted by the labor camp system get freedom and
the injustice vindicated, he really has eligibility to win
the Nobel Peace Prize.

相關文章
評論