【禁闻】陈光标晒现金 赴美欲买纽约时报

【新唐人2014年01月02日讯】中国富豪陈光标常有惊人之举:出售空气、砸日本车、高调进行各种慈善活动。 2013年的圣诞夜,陈光标再用东风大卡车运了一车16吨的百元大钞(约14亿),临时搭砌了一个“演播室”,宣传所谓“经济普查”。“晒钱”过后,他又透露,将赴美洽谈收购或参股美国媒体《纽约时报》。“典型的陈光标风格”这次又将引来哪些批评? 请看报导。

英国《路透社》周二(12月31日)报导说,中国“黄埔再生资源利用有限公司”董事长陈光标表示,他两年前就有收购《纽约时报》的想法,并将在1月5号在纽约和一位“主要股东”见面。

陈光标认为,《纽约时报》价值10亿美金,他将和香港另一位富豪共同出资,收购或者参股《纽约时报》。香港富豪有意愿出资5到6亿美元,他出资2到3亿美元。

消息传出后,《纽约时报》一名女发言人表示,公司不对谣言置评。而公司董事会主席小亚瑟•苏兹伯格(Arthur Sulzberger Jr.)则明确表态:我们不卖。

但陈光标说,只要能够购买《纽约时报》,他会毫不犹豫的倾尽家产。

陈光标还对《路透社》表示,如果这次收购提议失败,他将考虑收购美国有线电视网CNN、或《华盛顿邮报》、《华尔街日报》等。

陈光标以爱作秀、炒作出名,在中国大陆一直备受争议。

44岁的陈光标既不是全国人大代表、也不是全国政协委员,但自2000年开始,他已连续13年列席全国两会。去年(2013年),陈光标更是“戴绿帽”旁听两会,还建议“低学历者不该生子”,让众人愕然。

前《凤凰卫视》新闻总编庞钟认为,《纽约时报》卖给陈光标的可能性不大,陈光标的炒作有讨好中共的嫌疑。

旅美资深媒体人庞钟:“中共几年来一直是对海外媒体来施加影响力跟渗透,陈光标想利用这个机会向国内中共示好,而且通过这个事情迎合政府的某方面的想法吧。”

庞钟表示,《纽约时报》拥有美国的核心价值观,是西方文明的核心价值所在,不会像陈光标所想用钱就能买来。

陈光标曾在2012年8月,购买《纽约时报》的半版广告页面,刊登“ 钓鱼岛自古以来就是中国领土”的声明广告;去年(2013年)8月,他又两次在《纽约时报》宣示钓鱼岛主权。

中共自2008年下半年启动了“大外宣”战略。香港《动向》杂志去年(2013年) 8月号的报导指出,美国的华人社会,包括中文报纸、杂志、网站,能客观报导中国、不取悦中共者,已经寥寥无几了。

《动向》杂志指出,当美国CNN电视被限制在中国的五星级宾馆客房里,只供外国旅客收看的时候,中共的各类卫星电视广播,早已畅通无阻的进入美国四百万华人的家家户户了。

杂志报导认为,近五年来,美国的大学与智囊,发出批评中共的声音越来越小;中国的政治异议人士,一个接一个被抓进监狱;藏人一个接一个自焚;百姓的房子一幢接一幢被强拆;权贵们一个比一个疯狂的洗劫中国,这些已不再是美国的教授、学者们最为关注和研究的课题。在中共“大外宣”的金钱一笔一笔砸下后,美国的许多教授为中共暴政辩解的论文,一篇接一篇的刊登在美国的报纸杂志上。

中国政论专栏作家朱健国:“一个是把国内的党的喉舌、宣传机构把它做强,另一个就是把国外反对的声音、媒体把它收买。它的实质也就是进一步推行专制,把这个党天下从一国的范围扩张到世界上去。”

中国政论专栏作家朱健国指出,中共想在世界范围内搞“全球一片红”,却与现代社会的潮流、价值观念背道而驰。这种推行专制,限制别人存在的做法,到最后,自己也难以存在。

采访/陈汉 编辑/宋风 后制/陈建铭

Chen Guangbiao Shows-Off Cash to
Purchase “New York Times"

Chinese billionaire Chen Guangbiao often set the world on fire
by selling the air, smashing Japanese cars and taking part in a
variety of high-profile charity events.

On Christmas Eve 2013, Chen Guangbiao carried 16 tons of
one-hundred-dollar bills (about 1.4 billion) using a Dongfeng
truck to propagate a so-called economic census in a
temporary assembled studio.
After showing off the money, he disclosed he would negotiate
the takeover or equity participation of U.S. media
The NewYork Times in the US.

What type of criticism has the specific Chen Guangbiao style,
in turn attracted?

British “Reuters" (Dec. 31) reported on Tuesday that
China Huangpu renewable resources CEO Chen Guangbiao
had the idea of taking over the New York Times" two years ago.

He will meet the principal shareholder in New York in January.

Chen Guanbiao believes that the “New York Times" worth 10
billion dollars.
He will co-fund takeover or equity participation of The New
York Times with another Hong Kong tycoon.
The Hong Kong tycoon is willing to contribute 500 to 600
million dollars, he will contribute 200 to 300 million dollars.

After the news coming out, a New York Times spokeswoman
said the company will not comment on the rumors.
The Chairman of the Board of Directors Arthur Sulzberger Jr.
made it clear that they will not sell.

But Chen Guangbiao said he would use his property without
hesitancy as long as he can purchase The New York Times.

Chen Guangbiao also told Reuters that if the takeover proposal
failed, he would consider the takeover of U.S. cable television
network CNN, The Washington Post or Wall Street Journal etc.

Chen Guangbiao is famous of showing off or hyping things up
and was disputed in China mainland.

The 44 year old Chen Guangbiao is neither deputy of the
National People’s Congress (NPC) nor a member of the
National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political
Consultative Conference (CPPCC).
But since 2000, he has sat in the NPC and CPPCC for 13 years.
Last year, Chen Guangbiao sat in the NPC and CPPCC with a
green hat and suggested that lower level people shouldn’t
have children, which stunned everyone.

Previous news editor of “Phoenix" Pang Chung believes that
it’s unlikely that New York Times will sell to Chen Guangbiao
and his speculation is suspected to flatter
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

US China senior media person Pang Chung: The CCP has
exerted influence with penetration to the overseas media
for several years.

Chen Guangbiao would like to take this opportunity to show
good faith to the CCP and be subservient to it.

Pang Chung said, The New York Times is a core value of
America and Western civilization that is unlikely to be
purchased as Chen Guangbiao had hoped.

In August, 2012, Chen Guangbiao bought a half-page
advertisement from The New York Times to post a statement
stating: Diaoyu Islands are Chinese territory from the old.

Last August, he declared sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands
two times in The New York Times.

Since the second half of 2008 the CCP launched the “big
propaganda" strategy.
Last year, Hong Kong “Trends" magazine reported that there
are very few Chinese societies in the US, who can report on
China objectively without flattering including
newspapers, magazines and websites.
Trends magazine pointed out that when the U.S. CNN
television is limited to five-star hotel rooms in China
for only foreign visitors, the CCP various types of satellite
television broadcasting had unimpeded access to the
U.S. four million Chinese households.

A magazine report that in the last five years, US
universities and think tank issues believe the criticizing
voice of the CCP to becoming smaller and smaller.
Although Chinese political dissidents are being jailed
one by one; Tibetans self-immolation one after another;
people’s houses are being broken-down one by one;
dignitaries being ransacked in China are more and more crazy,
they are no longer subjects that attract the American professors’ attention.

There are more and more explanations for the CCP’s tyranny
published in US newspapers and magazines after more and
more money came from the CCP’s “big propaganda" strategy.
China Political columnist Zhu Jianguo: One is to make the
CCP propaganda and mouthpiece stronger, the other is to
suborn the foreign media and opposition.
It’s essential is to further the implementation of tyranny and
make the party world expand to the whole world.

Chinese Political columnist Zhu Jianguo pointed out that the
CCP wanted to create “a red world" in the world, but it runs
counter to the trend and modern values.
This implementation of despotism and limiting others
existence will make itself hard to exist.

相关文章
评论
新版即将上线。评论功能暂时关闭。请见谅!