【禁闻】探反腐? 中共将抽查核实官员财产

【新唐人2013年01月25日讯】中共新总书记习近平上台后多次强调,中共的腐败问题不解决势必将“亡党”,他在日前的中纪委会议上,矢言要“把权力关进制度的笼子”,要“老虎、苍蝇一起打”,同时,今年要执行领导干部报告个人有关事项制度,并开展抽查核实工作等。评论分析:中共当局被迫、被动“改革”,却是“用贪官反贪官”,所谓的“抽查”工作,可能选择性的用来攻击政敌,但民众还是不知道官员腐败到什么程度。

1月21号和22号,中共第十八届中纪委召开的第二次全体会议上,研究部署了2013年反腐败工作。习近平要求,“把权力关进笼子里”、并且加强反腐败国家立法、还要对领导干部个人有关事项进行抽查核实等。

对中共官员的有关信息,为什么是进行抽查核实,而不是全部核实?法学和中国问题专家赵远明分析,中共整肃贪腐的人,本身就有贪腐,所以反腐只能先抽一部分作为试点。

法学和中国问题专家赵远明:“按习近平的政策‘苍蝇老虎一起打’,那都打完了,它这个政权就完了,因为没有干部了,95%的干部都要关到监狱里,那你政府怎么运作?它只好先5%,选择贪污数量民愤比较大的,在政治上和习李新政唱对台戏的,或者不听话的,就先打,然后那些听话的虽然贪一点,你赶快收敛收敛,它可能就不打或者延迟打。”

政论家伍凡分析,现在中共只是“试探性的反腐”。

政论家伍凡:“他不做也不行,不做现在贪污腐败太厉害,民怨太大,民间反应太坏,那么他样子也要做一点,他这次不是讲:大老虎也打,小苍蝇也打。问题大老虎打的是什么老虎?什么算大老虎?什么算小老虎?这个标准我们不知道。不管怎么讲吧,他现在已经在架子上了,不打也不行了。”

大陆律师唐荆陵指出,这是当局被迫、被动改革的一种体现。民间要求官员财产公开呼声高涨,当局面对舆论的压力,提出这个措施,试图跟上民意的步伐。

大陆律师唐荆陵:“这种所谓抽查式的财产公开,他们的那个财产公开是指向政府内部机构公开,比如说向纪委,或者向中共的党的机构公开,并不是指的向民众,实际上,我们所要求的这个公开是指政府官员必须向人民负责,向人民公开他的财产和利益关系状况。”

唐荆陵还表示,当局这种“应对式的改革”措施,不能够顺应民众的呼吁,所有“抽查”都可能选择性的用来攻击政敌,但民众还是不知道官员腐败到什么程度。

此外,中纪委会议上还制订“反腐五年规划”,同时还强调要不折不扣落实“八项规定”、“以党章治党”,做到信仰不变,坚决维护党章的权威性和严肃性,保证党的集中统一。

唐荆陵指出,“用贪官反贪官”,是中共维护专制体制的秘诀,如果真反腐,它就很难维持下去,现在它强调“以党章治党”也是维持专政的手段。

唐荆陵:“专制是通过利益分肥体系来维持它的运转,通过给一些人提供好处,那么这些人愿意成为它的工具,来统治人民,来奴役人民,所以用贪官反贪官这是专制的必然逻辑。”

伍凡指出,共产党自己治不了党

伍凡:“共产党现在不反腐败也是死,反腐败也是死,看看它怎么死法,如果这么反腐败,它不敢把东西公开曝光,要曝光,那反共的更厉害,那么你现在不曝光,悄悄的来治,那很多人就在你下手之前,人家就逃跑了,有那么多资金往外跑,你共产党也是死,总之,用这种办法是不能解决问题的。”

伍凡指出,中共“以党章治党”已经治了几十年了,越治越贪。他说,这种做法不是为了“解决贪污”,纯粹是为了“挽救共产党”。

采访编辑/李韵 后制/王明宇

Chinese Regimes Anti-Corruption Campaign: Announces Spot-Checks of Officials’ Property

After Xi Jinping became the new Secretary General
of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), he
emphasized several times that the CCP will cease
to exist if the issue of corruption is not solved.
In a recent meeting of the Central Commission for
Discipline Inspection (CCDI), Xi vowed to put “power
within a cage of regulations”, to “fight both tigers and flies”.

He also said this year will see the execution of a rule
that leaders will have to declare personal properties.
They will also launch random spot-checks on officials.

Commentators analyzed that the CCP authorities
were forced to undergo reform, but “use corrupt officials as the target of anti-corruption.”
These so-called “spot-checks” may
be used to attack political opponents.
However, people still won’t know
how corrupt CCP officials are.

On January 21 and 22, the CCP 18th CCDI
organized it’s second plenary meeting.
In it, they discussed the deployment
the anti-corruption actions in 2013.
In this meeting, Xi Jinping asked to place
“power within a cage of regulations”.
He also asked for the strengthening of anti-corruption
legislation, and to spot-check officials’ personal property.

Why did Xi Jinping ask for spot-checks of CCP
officials, but not an overall system to stop corruption?
Zhao Yuanming, an expert on Chinese
law and current affairs, commented.
Zhao analyzed that the CCP official in charge
of purging corruption is himself corrupt.
This is the reason why anti-corruption
will only target a small group.

Zhao Yuanming: “If they follow Xi Jinping’s request to
‘fight tigers and flies’, and remove all the corrupt officials,
the regime will be over because there are no clean officials.

95% of current officials will be jailed,
so how could the regime operate?
That’s the reason why they have to fight 5% first.

They will select the corrupt officials who the
Chinese people are most aggrieved with.
They will also select those who politically oppose
the Xi-Li leadership, or don’t follow their commands.
Obedient officials who are also corrupt, will restrain
themselves to try to avoid being targeted now or later.”

Wu Fan, a political commentator analyzed that the
CCP is currently tentatively acting for anti-corruption.

Wu Fan: “He [Xi Jinping] has to do it because corruption
is very serious now, and there are too many grievances.
Civil reaction has been very bad,
which forced him to do something.
He said he will fight the big tigers and small
flies, but the question is which kind of tiger?
Who is a big tiger, and who is a small tiger?
We don’t know the criteria for measuring this.
No matter what he said, he is
on the stage and has to fight.”

Tang Jingling, a lawyer in Mainland China, highlights that
this is a reaction because the regime was forced to reform.
The people began asking louder and louder for
officials to publish information on their properties.
Under this pressure, the authorities launched
this policy, in order to meet public opinion.

Tang Jingling: “This so-called spot-checking of officials’
property, means they will publish this information internally.
This will include the CCDI and other CCP’s organizations.
This information will not be published to the public.
In fact, the publishing we asked for as civilians
is the officials take responsibility for the people.
That they would publish their
property and interests to the people.”

Tang Jingling also said that the “reaction of reform”
by the authorities isn’t to meet the people’s appeal.
All the spot-checks can be used to fight political opponents,
and people will still not know how corrupt the officials are.

In addition, the CCDI made a “five-year anti-corruption plan”
in the meeting, emphasizing implementation of the
“eight regulars” and “rule the party by party constitution.”

All the officials should be consistent in this belief.

They should safeguard the seriousness of the party
constitution, to ensure the party is centralized and unified.

Tang Jingling points out that the “use of corrupt
officials to undertake anti-corruption” is the CCP’s secret to maintain its dictatorship.
If they were to really act to end corruption,
it will be hard for the CCP to survive.
Now it emphasizes “rule the party by party
constitution,” to maintain its dictatorship.

Tang Jingling: “The dictatorship is maintained by
a distribution of interests and benefits within it’s system.
It gives a group of people some benefits, then those people
are likely to be the party’s tools to rule and enslave people.
So it’s an inevitable logic for a dictatorship that
uses corrupt officials to work to end corruption.”

Wu Fan highlights that the CCP is not able to save itself.

Wu Fan: “Now, the CCP will collapse,
regardless of anti-corruption measures.
This is part of the process of its death.

With regards to anti-corruption, it doesn’t dare to really
explore anti-corruption, because this will become anti-CCP.
So it will act secretly against corruption, then many corrupt
officials will flee China before the CCP is able to take action.
Then so much money will leave
China, and the CCP will collapse.
In a few words, anti-corruption is not the solution.”

Wu Fan says that the CCP has ruled for over 60
years, using “rule the party by party constitution”.
However, it has become more and more corrupt.

This shows that this is not a solution to “solve the situation
of corruption”, but it is an attempt to “save the party”.

相关文章
评论
新版即将上线。评论功能暂时关闭。请见谅!