【新唐人2011年3月22日讯】中国体操界日前又爆特大丑闻。在去年（2010年）广州亚运自由体操决赛上，中国籍裁判员邵斌涉嫌违规执法，私自修改中国选手张成龙的完成分，使得张成龙从第二名变成并列第一名。邵斌对此供认不讳，国际体联将对他提起诉讼。
国际体操联合会（FIG）最近在官网上发布声明，认为邵斌的这种行为“完全无法接受”，决定将他移交纪律委员会，并将提出“违反体育道德准则和裁判规程”的相关诉讼。
“改分门”丑闻被曝光后，引起各界人士的广泛关注，令中国体操界始料不及。几天后，身为上海大学体育学院院长的邵斌终于露面接受媒体采访，但宣称对自己“改分”的行为不后悔，他辩解说，他这么做是为了“保护中国队员的利益”。
对此，网友指出，关键是：不能因为你觉得不正常，想改就改，一切都应按规则执行。这种现象不只是中国体育界的问题，而是整个中国社会的问题，从中央到地方，都将法律视为儿戏。
也有网友直指：违法就是违法，还找那么多理由！
国际体操联合会新闻官员菲利普•斯拉奇对《自由亚洲电台》表示，国际体操联合会以前没有碰到过这类擅自修改比分的事件。
菲利普：“没有。你可以在我们会长的报告中看到，他说：这是他漫长职业生涯中第一次碰到这种事情。” 大陆官方媒体报导，中国体操协会声明：“改分门”是邵斌个人行为，与中国体操协会、中国体操队和选手无关。
去年，中国体操队曾深陷“年龄门”丑闻，体操队员董芳霄因为年龄造假，被国际体操联合会取消悉尼奥运会比赛成绩，中国体操协会就曾声明，这是董芳霄的个人行为。
《青岛晚报》评论指出，这背后，是一条人们看不到的利益链条，当“年龄门”、“改分门”之类的危机爆发时，这个利益链条就会“丢卒保车”。董芳霄区区一个小女子，居然能突破中国户籍制度的多重封锁线？怎么可能是个人行为呢？
《经济观察网》评论员朱冲也发表文章“金牌梦之队变成了丑闻梦之队”，文章指出，中国体育常常被上升到“爱国”的“政治高度”。可如此多的丑闻，才是真正损害了中国形象，才是“不爱国”。
美国新泽西长城足球学校教练韩武：“美国好像没有把它看成这么重，跟国家的荣誉挂钩。这种急功近利把金牌看得太重，它就影响到很多做假，也和发展体育的初衷就有矛盾的地方。”
此前，香港《开放》杂志执行编辑蔡咏梅，也曾剖析了这种举国体制的深层因素，认为中共热衷办体育活动，是用体育进行“党文化”的输出。
蔡咏梅：“（中共用）文宣系统进行宣传，体育也是另外 一种形式的宣传，所有的共产国家体育都是非常好的。他们用这个凸显制度的优越性，实际上是一种意识形态的表现。”
国际体操联合会新闻官员菲利普表示，邵斌需要亲自到洛桑的国际体操联合会参加听证会。
新唐人记者李谦、柏妮综合报导。
Cheating is “Patriotic”
Anchor:
Another scandal in Chinese gymnastics has surfaced.
In the 2010 Asian Games held in Guangzhou,
Chinese referee, Shao Bin, violated rules and made
unauthorized changes to Chinese player
Zhang Chenglong’s points.
His action led to Zhang Chenglong’s ascent
from second to first place,
tying with Kim Soo Myun of Korea.
Shao Bin acknowledged what he did.
The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG)
will sue him.
FIG recently issued a statement on its official site
that Shao Bin’s action is “wholly unacceptable.”
FIG will refer Shao Bin to its disciplinary committee.
The Chinese gymnastics circles was not prepared
for the exposure of this scandal,
which has caused widespread public concern.
A few days later, the Dean of College of Sports
at Shanghai University,
Shao Bin finally accepted media interviews.
He said he does not regret “changing the score.”
He argued that he did it in order
to “protect Chinese team members’ interest."
Netizens pointed out that one cannot change scores
at will. He needs to follow the rules.
This is not just a problem in the community of sports,
but an issue of the entire Chinese society.
From the central government to local authorities,
law is not taken seriously.
Some netizens also stated:
“The fact is that it is illegal.
Why is he looking for excuses?”
FIG spokesperson Philippe Filacci told RFA,
FIG has never encountered an incident
such as score modification before.
Philippe:
“No. You can see in our report.
This is the first time I ran into such an issue
in my long career path.”
According to mainland China’s official media,
Chinese Gymnastics Association announced that
Shao Bin did it on his own. It has nothing to do
with the Chinese Gymnastics Association,
Chinese Gymnastics team, and its members.
Last year, the Chinese gymnastics team
was bogged down in a scandal of age forging.
This caused the cancellation of gymnast
Dong Fangxiao’s result during the Sydney Olympics,
Chinese Gymnastics Association stated that it was
Dong Fangxiao’s personal behavior.
Qingdao Evening News indicated that there is
an invisible chain of benefits behind the scenes.
When the scandals of “age forging" and
“score changing " were exposed,
it would rather sacrifice part of itself
in order to save the whole chain.
How can a powerless girl like Dong Fangxiao
have access to the Chinese household registration
system? How could it be an individual act?
Economic Observer Online commentator Zhu Chong
also published an article titled: “Gold Medal
Dream Team Turned into a Scandal Team.”
The article points out that sport in China is often
presented to be a patriotic and political issue.
The many scandals indeed damage
the image of China. It is in fact unpatriotic.
New Jersey Great Wall Soccer School coach
Han Wu: “U.S. does not treat it as something
so important, linking sport with the national honor.
The short-term pursuit on gold medals
leads to lots of fraud. It also contradicts
with the original purpose of sports."
Earlier, Hong Kong’s Open magazine
executive editor, Cai Yongmei, also analyzes
the underlying factors of nationwide sport system.
She thinks that the communist regime is keen
to hold sports events to export its “party culture."
Cai Yongmei: “The communist party uses propaganda
to influence people. Sport is another form
of propaganda for them. All communist countries
are very good at sporting events. They use sport
to highlight the superiority of their system.
In fact, it is an expression of ideology."
FIG press officer Philippe indicated Shao Bin
needs to attend the hearing at FIG in Lausanne.
NTD Reporters Li Qian and Bo Ni
