【新唐人2011年6月28日訊】大陸一位網名叫“郭美美baby”的女孩，近期在微博上掀起軒然大波。美女、炫富、紅十字會、貪腐等字眼，引來眾多網民們的圍觀。郭美美扯出貪腐鏈條，多位政府官員和社會名人牽涉其中。而「中國紅十字會」面對信任危機，無法對公眾作出合理解釋。
這段視頻中的主角是自稱“住大別墅、開瑪莎拉蒂”的20歲女孩“郭美美”。6月23號，自稱擁有十多個愛馬仕名包的郭美美在網上炫富，她在新浪微博認證的身份是加了“V”的“中國紅十字會商業總經理”。
一位自稱“紅十字會”的“經理”，身家居然如此富有，這一消息不僅極速引起了社會關注，同時也引起眾多網民的憤怒和質疑：“捐給紅十字會的錢到底哪去了？”
在漫天的質疑聲中，“郭美美”發表聲明說，“中國紅十字會商業總經理”的身份是自己杜撰的，並為這種“愚昧行為”致歉。而新浪網也作出“澄清”，指郭美美身份認證為演員。
“香港明鏡畫報”在微博中反問，那麼多名稱，為甚麼要杜撰成紅十字會商會？僅僅是因為無知嗎？如果你跟這個單位沒有關係，你怎麼可能想到這個名字？
“中國紅十字會”則連發四道聲明澄清，還聲稱，對惡意炒作事件的單位和個人，將保留追究權。
中國公民記者周曙光：“紅十字會出來一個法律聲明說誰再惡意炒作，紅十字會就要法律追究。但是沒有提到要追究郭美美的責任。”
評論認爲，事件疑點多多，而紅十字會辯解無力，只有“聲明”而無法“證明”，只有闢謠而沒有自省。
周曙光：“它光否認不行，還得說清楚。爲甚麽會有這麽多人事關係顯示出她–郭美美和她的贊助者，和紅十字會爲甚麽有這麽多聯繫？爲甚麽她們能夠使用紅十字會的名義去做募捐活動？“郭美美這個事件牽扯出來，紅十字會裏邊可能存在貪腐，所以大家覺得應該把它公開。”
對於中國紅十字會的態度，中國社會科學院學者於建嶸在微博上說：“一日不公開，一日不捐款。” 他認為，此事所表現出來的是民眾 對中國紅十字會官僚化和長期不透明的憤怒；並且中國紅十字會面對信任危機，沒能給出合理解釋。
《揚州晚報》 評論說，炫富，郭美美不是第一個。但是炫了剎不住車的，郭美美應該算是第一個。
隨著中國網民不斷深入的“人肉搜索”，事件目前已經引發連鎖反應，不僅扯出貪腐鏈條，多位政府官員和社會名人也牽涉其中，中國網民也因此發起了一場“反貪腐”公民行動。
周曙光：“（在中國）也許民眾去抨擊一個政府的貪腐行爲可能會被視爲政治行爲，但是我們去關注一個名義上的非政府組織的話，這樣就會壓力小很多，所以大家都在不停的追問。 ”
鳳凰台名主持人楊瀾，日前曾出面，想幫紅十字會闢謠，不料卻反被網友爆出她與中國青基會共同製造“假捐門”。楊瀾緊急發表聲明，說自己很清白，對於這些解釋，網友們也表示不相信，正力圖尋求真相。
反腐義勇軍張建中：“在中國，公權力現在一直是失信於民的一個重要信號，一直失信於民。你在5.12汶川大地震時期捐的款，和其他一些有災難的時候人民捐的款都哪裏去了？從來沒公開過。具體每一筆的款項都到哪裏去了？也沒有公開過，反正至少我沒看到過，網友也在懷疑這些款項都到哪裏去了。所以來講，躲貓貓。“
郭美美乘坐班機於27號凌晨抵達北京。有網友認為，郭美美可能會搬家或前往國外，“郭美美事件”的中心人物可能將神秘消失於公眾視野。
新唐人記者 常春 王子琦 郭敬採訪報導
Red Cross Executive Criticized for Showing Off
A girl named Guo Meimei recently showed off
her wealth on micro-blogs and caused an uproar.
Many incidents of corruption have been exposed.
Many officials and celebrities are implicated.
China Red Cross is facing a crisis of confidence,
but it fails to offer the public a sound explanation.
The protagonist in the video is a 20-year-old,
who claims to live in a mansion and drives a Maserati.
On June 23, she bragged about owning a dozen Hermes.
She is a commerce general manager at China Red Cross,
as per her verified identity by Sina.com Micro-blog.
A self-proclaimed GM of Red Cross is so wealthy!
The news caused a stir in the online community,
and drew anger and doubts from netizens, who ask,
What happened to the donations to Red Cross?
Amidst the questions and doubts, Guo apologized for
her fabricated identity and her “foolish behavior”.
Sina declared to have identified Guo to be an actress.
Hong Kong’s Mirror Illustrated asked these questions:
Among all names, why chose “Red Cross Commerce”?
If you have nothing to do with this place,
how did its name come to your mind?
China Red Cross Society issued four statements
to clear its name and to reserve its rights to
further investigate this incident and its perpetrator.
Chinese independent reporter Zhou Shuguang:
“The Red Cross announced to investigate the incident.
However, why doesn’t it do an investigation of Guo?”
The media find the incident suspicious.
Red Cross’s explanation is not reasonable.
It can only “claim” rather than “prove”.
Zhou Shuguang: “Denial alone is not good enough.
The many connections between Guo, her sponsors
and the Red Cross need to be explained.
How can they solicit donations in Red Cross’s name?
Now the Guo Meimei incident has been exposed,
it is possible that corruption exists in Red Cross.
Thus, the organization should be made transparent.
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences scholar
Yu Jianrong wrote on micro-blog:
“As long as it is not transparent, I don’t donate.”
He believes that this incident shows people’s anger
towards an opaque bureaucratization of Red Cross.
Also, when facing a confidence crisis
Red Cross is unable to offer a sound explanation.
Yangzhou Evening News commented that
although many people had showed off their wealth,
Guo is the first who fails to step on the brake in time.
Chinese netizens’ further investigation has triggered
a chain reaction and exposed a corruption chain.
Many officials and celebrities are implicated.
Thus, Chinese netizens have initiated
a civilian “anti-corruption” movement.
Zhou: Many may view it as a political act
for citizens to attack officials’ corruption.
However, if we focus on a nominal NGO,
the pressure would be much smaller.
That is why many people keep on asking questions.
Well-known host at Phoenix TV, Yang Lan,
tried to help clear Red Cross’s name.
However, she invited suspicion for
being a co-creator of a “fabricated donation gate”.
Even after she issued a statement to claim innocence,
netizens still wouldn’t believe her.
Anti-corruption volunteer Zhang Jianzhong:
The authorities have lost their credibility among people.
Where did donations for the Sichuan Earthquake go?
The distribution of donations is never made public.
Netizens also question the whereabouts of the money.
Some people are playing hide and seek with us.
Guo’s flight arrived in Beijing on June 27.
Some believe that Guo may move or go abroad.
The central figure of the Guo Meimei incident
may disappear mysteriously from the public view.
NTD reporters Chang Chun，Wang Ziqi and Guo Jing
