【新唐人2011年9月30日訊】大陸北京大學「公眾參與研究與支持中心」在9月28號發佈了《中國行政透明度報告》。報告總體認為，43個國務院各機構的總體得分，相對於省級行政單位來說分數偏低，而國務院參與評測的下設機構，僅兩成及格，只有12個部門得分60分以上，得分最低的監察部僅得8分。
9月28號是「國際知情權日」。「北大公眾參與中心」對中共國務院下設的43個機構，全國30個省級政府等機構進行了觀察和評估。
評測團隊將《信息公開條例》的執行情況做了打分和排名，指標體系包括組織配套、制度配套、主動公開、依申請公開，以及監督和救濟。
43個國務院下設機構評測平均得分51.7分，只有9個單位及格，佔總數的20.9%，得分最高的國家知識產權局，也僅僅68分。鐵道部、國務院法制辦、監察部名列後三名。
對此，網友說，神奇的國度！報告講的太客氣了！
前北京大學新聞學院副教授焦國標：“他無需對這負責當然他不透明了。有問題的、就是有缺陷的。他依據這些資料本身能不能做到透明——也就是特別如實、特別詳實，就這個問題！”
作為高高在上的國務院行政機構的透明度，為甚麼還不如省級機構呢？
前北京大學新聞學院副教授焦國標：“因為中共國務院的特權更多，所以透明度更小。另外，中共傳統中不是權力越大特權越多嗎！透明度就越來越低啊！”
此外，監察部已經連續兩年在《透明度報告》中墊底。去年發佈的《行政透明度報告》（2009年度）中，監察部得分12分，在依申請公開項中得分為零。
而監察部官網聲稱，“由於監察部工作涉密性強，暫不開展依申請公開工作。”
網友揶揄監管部門說：“說你行你就行，不行也行！說不行就不行，行也不行！老百姓：不服不行！”
按照《政府信息公開條例》的規定，政府信息公開工作主管部門和監察機關，負責對行政機關政府信息公開的實施情況進行監督檢查。
焦國標：“中共他是個迷信權力的東西。他權力至上他不信仰甚麼東西，所以說他只要有權力的話，權力越高胡作非為的程度越重。”
此外，報告中還顯示，國務院法制辦在“規章草案意見徵集”中是“零參與”，“制度配套”鐵道部得分為零。
新唐人記者陳漢、李靜薛莉採訪報導。
Transparency in Mainland China: Only 20% of State Agencies Pass.
Beijing University Public Participation in Research and
Support Center released a China』s Administrative
Transparency Report on September 28th.
The report shows that 43 state agencies』 overall score is
relatively lower than provincial level administrative agencies.
Only 2 out of 10 State Council’s subsidiary bodies
involved in evaluation passed.
Only 12 departments scored over 60%,
the supervision department got the lowest score of only 8%.
September 28th is the International Right-to-Know Day.
Beijing University』s public participation center evaluated
43 institutes of the CCP』s state council,
and provincial level government institutions in 30 provinces.
The evaluation team scored and ranked institutions based on
Information Disclosure Regulations.
The index system includes organizational support,
systems support, disclosure of information actively or
through application, and monitoring charitable relief support.
The average for the 43 state institutions is 51.7%, and
only 9 (20% of all) units scored passed.
The State Intellectual Property Office scored the highest at
a mere 68%, the Ministry of Railways,
the State Council Legislative Affairs Office got the lowest scores.
Former Beijing University School of Journalism associate professor
Jiao Guobiao : “They are not transparent because they don』t need to be responsible.
With the transparency of the data itself, I think there are problems.
They are based on whether the information itself can be done with
transparency, that is a truly detailed example.”
The monitoring unit had been at the bottom of
the Transparency Report in the past 2 years.
In the “Administrative Transparency Report” in 2009,
the monitoring unit only scored 12%, with a score of zero
in accordance of the application of publicizing works.
Internet users ridiculed the monitoring unit:
If I say you can do it, then you can even if you can』t,
if I say you can』t, then you can』t even if you can.
Public: we must comply!
According to Government Information Transparency
Regulations, the disclosure of government information
departments and supervisory units, are responsible
for supervising and inspecting the implementation of
information transparency regulations to state institutions.
Jiao Guobiao: the CCP blindly believes in power.
They don』t believe in anything other than power,
therefore as long as they have the power, the bigger it is,
the less responsible they are for their actions.
The report also shows thatthe State Council Legislative
Affairs Office has zero involvement in
the “opinion collection on the draft regulations” and
the ministry of Railways scored zero in “institutional framework.”
NTDTV Chen Han, Li Jing and Xue Li
