【新唐人2011年6月22日讯】在中共强力维稳的政策下，广州增城新塘冲突目前已经告一段落。当局开始秋后算账，逮捕了19人，而且，还用“城市户口”作为悬赏，让外来民工举报参与者。当局声称，在冲突中做到了“三个照常、六个没有”，网友则嘲讽说：“什么都没有，只有抓人！”
《增城日报》19号刊发了增城市公安局通告。通告把新塘冲突说成是“聚集滋事事件”，而举报相关的所谓“不法份子”，当局承诺，将视情节给予人民币5000元到10000元的奖励，并可参与“见义勇为好市民”的评选。此外，举报者如果是外来务工人员，成绩突出的，可获“优秀外来工”称号， 给予迁入增城户口。
此前，当局发《通报》声称，军警在事件中没有开过一枪，也没有发生警民冲突，当局做到了“三个照常、六个没有”。也就是，商铺照常营业，工厂企业照常上班，除 6月11号大敦村学校主动停课一天外，其余学校照常上课，并且没有造成任何死亡﹔公安、武警没有携带任何杀伤性武器，没有开一枪一弹，没有一间商铺被抢、被砸、被烧，没有发生警民冲突，没有出现当地人与外地人的对立冲突。
荆楚（中国作家）：“一方面，它可能觉得，此风不可长，这样一长，就鼓励老百姓反抗了。他们有一种忧虑、有一个紧张。第二方面，从历史方面来看，中共一直是靠谎言欺骗和暴力血腥恐怖，来控制中国人民的。教育系统，还有宣传系统，搞假大空、党八股 ，伪造历史啊，来欺骗国内人民，消除反抗意识。”
6月15号，当局以妨害公务罪、寻衅滋事罪、故意破坏财物罪逮捕了19人。
台湾《中国时报》引述网友“风语者密码”的话说：“既然都“6个没有”，那为什么要抓人？
此外，当局利用奖励户口来作为告密的诱惑，也引发众多媒体提出质疑。
《法制周报》署名陈在田的文章指出，中国户籍制度门槛本身，就是激化社会矛盾的潜在因素之一，用户籍奖励举报者无疑有“伤口撒盐”的效果，如果还想将之用于“化解”矛盾，恰恰是南辕北辙。
中国的户籍制度一直备受批评，因为它让约1.53亿的外来务工人员无法享受基本权利，加剧了社会不和谐。
香港《苹果日报》的评论说，增城将户口作为举报的奖赏，显示当局相信城市户口对农民工的吸引力。但是，这个做法也显示了当局操作户籍问题的随意性，没有法例可循。
增城130万居民中，超过三分之一是外来务工人员，而城市户口一直是他们梦寐以求的。
新唐人记者张丽娜、李静、周平采访报导。
Six NOs in Xintang Incident Except for Arrests!
The Xintang uprising has currently been settled
under the strong policy of stability-maintenance by
the Chinese authorities (CCP), with 19 arrests.
The CCP began its retaliation by offering any informants
registered city residency as a reward.
The authorities claimed 6 NOs during the suppression
of the uprising, but Netizens ridicule “nothing but arrests.”
Zengcheng Daily announced a police statement on
June 19, labeling the Xintang Incident as a mobbish act.
The officials offered cash reward of 5000 -10000 RMB
to any informants, plus a title of heroic citizen.
If the informant is a migrant worker, he or she could be
rewarded with registered residency in Zengcheng city.
The authorities claimed that during the incident,
the police didn’t open fire; no police-citizen conflicts
ever occurred; the authorities maintained the normal
businesses of stores, factories and enterprises.
In addition, the authorities also achieved 6 NOs:
No casualties incurred during the unrest;
No lethal weapons carried by police;
No gunfire, burnt stores, robbery and arson;
No conflicts between police and citizens;
No conflicts between local residents and the migrants;
No schools closed, despite one-day class off on June 11
for the Daguo village school.
Jing Chu (Chinese Writer): The CCP was afraid of revolt
so they tried to prevent the unrest from lasting long.
Besides, in both education and propaganda,
the CCP sustained its regime with violence and lies.
Throughout history the CCP was falsifying the truth
to hoodwink the public, defusing their will to revolt.
The CCP arrested 19 people on June 15 in the name of
obstructing official business and committing vandalism.
China Times quoted Netizen “Wind Code” by saying:
“Why do they still arrest people, given the 6 NOs?”
The lure of awarding registered urban residency to
informants also sparked questioning from many media.
Chen Zaitian says in Legal Daily,
the Chinese registered residence system
is one of the banes to social contradiction.
Rewarding informants with urban residency can only
make the conflict worse,
and is counter-productive in problem solving.
The household registration system in China has long
been criticized, since it deprives 153 millions of
migrant workers of their basic social benefits and
renders the society even more unstable.
Hong Kong’s Apple Daily says, using registered
urban residency as a reward indicates that
the authorities believe in the power of city residence
to migrant workers.
It shows how arbitrarily the officials manipulate
the urban residency issue beyond any norms.
Among the 1.3 million Zengcheng residents,
more than 1/3 are migrant workers,
who long for a registered urban residency.
NTD reporters Zhang Lina,Li Jing and Zhou Ping
