【禁闻】深圳驱逐八万人 律师:不合法

【新唐人2011年4月13日讯】第廿六届世界大学生夏季运动会,将于8月在深圳举行。为此,深圳警方召开新闻发布会,表示在过去的100天里,已令八万多名所谓“治安高危人员”离开深圳,今后会更加严打犯罪份子,并招募五十万名市民,就地监察。中国维权律师李和平表示,这项做法“违法”。

为准备第廿六届“世动会”8月在深圳举行,当地警方由元旦起实行“治安高危人员排查清理百日行动”,这期间,当局拘捕了8千多人,并驱逐超过八万名的所谓“治安高危人员”出深圳。

深圳市公安局副局长兼新闻发言人解释,所谓“治安高危人员”,是指没有正当理由而长期滞留深圳,行踪可疑,对深圳治安和市民生命财产安全,构成现实威胁的人员。他还表示,这项行动不会停止,还将召募五十万名市民当“红袖章”人士,监察家居或范围内的人,并在各小区加设闭路电视,监察人员进出。

中国知名维权律师李和平表示,警方凭着自己的“主观印象”区分人群,这本身就不合法。

李和平(维权律师):“第一,中华人民共和国宪法规定,法律面前人人平等。每 一个人的合法权利都要受到法律的保护。那么深圳将八万人,他们认为的所谓的特殊人群,就要进行驱赶,那么显然是违背了这条。第二个,行政法有个原理就是说法律授权你才能做,法律没有授权,行政机关工作人员做了,那都是违法甚至是犯罪,这显然是违法的。违反行政法的一个基本的原理。”

深圳居民孙先生向《新唐人》表示,这种做法让老百姓人心惶惶。

孙先生(深圳居民):“这样就害苦了很多的老百姓,很多的平民百姓就遭殃了。有很多老百姓想到这里来找份工作啊,想到这里找点小生意做啊,也是想到这里来安下来过点小日子啊,但是他就把这么一些人全都弄得人心惶惶的。”

河北《燕赵晚报》批评说,警方目前的做法只会让这些人生活无着落,增加社会的不稳定因素。而一刀切的把所谓的“治安高危人员”清理出自己所辖的城市,显然是一种懒政。

张先生(深圳居民):“我们这个执政党,现在就是由于那个埃及的暴动以及一些国家推翻独裁政权,那我们中国的执政的主体有一定的困难度,现在我们中国共产党已经领导了我们62年 了,但现在为止,他们也很恐慌。埃及事件啊,一个是贪污,第二个就是就业,再一个就是物价高起。我们中国也存在埃及的问题。我们中国现在也存在贪污。第二,失业,还有物价高起等。”

《国际在线》有文章指出,其实,一个大型赛事活动的安保,就是检验一个国家的文明程度,我们不能因为安保任务重,就采取一刀切的方式来剥夺公民的合法权利,这违背了大型国际赛事举办的初衷。这与“大运会”核心价值不符。

而深圳独立学者朱建国告诉《自由亚洲电台》,深圳警方在 “治安高危人员” 七类人中,特别提到了“有报复社会的极端言行,可能危及他人或公共安全的”人员,他说,“这个模糊的界定很可能成为有关当局打击民间声音的借口。”

新唐人记者张丽娜、南希、刘惠采访报导。

“It is Illegal to Expel 80,000 People”

The 26th Summer World University Games will be
held in Shenzhen in August. On a news conference
Shenzhen police said that they have ordered
more than 80,000 “high-risk security personnel"
to leave Shenzhen in the past 100 days.
They’ll also strengthen the crackdown on criminals,
and will recruit 500,000 residents to help monitor.
Chinese human rights lawyer Li Heping
stated that this practice is “illegal."

Since January 1, Shenzhen police have implemented
the “100 Day Operation to Investigate and Cleanup
High-Risk Personnel", for August’s
26th Summer World University Games.
During these days over 8,000 people were arrested
and over 80,000 people were expelled.

Deputy director and spokesman of Shenzhen City
Public Security Bureau explained the so-called
“High-Risk Security Personnel" refers to those
who lived long in Shenzhen without justification,
without steady whereabouts, and pose real threats
to the City safety, the public life and property.
He also expressed this operation will continue.
They will recruit 500,000 people as “red armbands"
to monitor people at home and those within the
profile in particular, and will install cameras
in each neighborhood to monitor people in and out.

China’s renowned human rights lawyer Li Heping
said it is illegal for the police to single out people
based on their own “subjective judgment"

Li Heping: “First, the Chinese Constitution states
equality is before the law. The legal rights
of each individual are protected. It is against the law
to expel 80,000 people whom the police singles out.
Second, the principle of administration is based on
authorization by law. If the law does not authorize
the administrative staff to carry out an operation,
it is illegal or even criminal to carry it out.
It is a violation of the fundamental principle
of the administrative law.”

Shenzhen resident Mr. Sun told NTD Television
that this operation makes people panic.

Mr. Sun: “It hurts a lot of people. Many people came
to Shenzen to look for a job or to do small business.
They want to settle down to start a life.
What the police is doing makes people panic.”

Hebei Province’s Yanzhao Evening News criticized
the current practice as taking away people’s income
and increasing social instability. To clean up
the so-called “high-risk people" out of the city
under their jurisdiction is an obvious lazy practice.

Shenzhen resident Mr. Zhang: “Due to Egypt’s riots
and the overthrow of some totalitarian regimes,
the Chinese government has some difficulties.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ruled China
for 62 years and is panicking now.
The reasons for Egyptian revolution are corruption,
unemployment and sharp price increases.
We also have these problems in China, corruption,
unemployment, and sharp price increases.”

An article from International Online points out,
that the security work for a large sports event
is a test to a country’s level of civilization. “We can’t
deprive citizens of their rights to heavy
security protection. This is against the purpose
and core values of major international events.”

Shenzhen independent scholar Zhu Jianguo told
Radio Free Asia, that the 7 categories
of “High-Risk Security Personnel", particularly
mention " revenging on society with extreme words
and actions that, might endanger public safety."
Zhu Jianguo: “Such vague definition is likely
to be the authorities’ excuse to suppress people."

NTD reporters Zhang Lina,Nan Xi and Li Hui

相关文章
评论
新版即将上线。评论功能暂时关闭。请见谅!