【新唐人2015年02月10日訊】最近中共國家體育總局全運會「獎牌榜」死而復生，讓中紀委下令追查，引發話題。中國體育界「唯金牌論」的政績觀由來已久，那麼取消「獎牌榜」就能改善這種情況嗎？體育總局的烏龍，會不會引來中紀委的反腐炮火呢？我們一起來看看下面的報導。
大陸媒體說，在國家體育總局官網上，找到標註1月30號公布的《關於印發第十三屆運動會競賽規程總則(草案)的通知》，其中這樣寫道：「公布代表團成績榜，包括金、銀、銅牌數，獎牌數和總分數。成績榜排序依次按照金牌數、銀牌數、銅牌數、總分數的高低排列」。
除此之外，2月4號，在另一份《第十三屆全國冬季運動會競賽規程》中，也有相同的內容。
但是，體育總局之前在1月26號，向社會公布了中央第十一巡視組去年巡視整改的情況。其中明確表示：「今後對全運會等全國綜合性運動會只公布比賽成績榜，不再分別公布各省區的金牌、獎牌和總分排名」。體育總局聲稱，這是為了引導全國體育界樹立所謂的正確「體育政績觀」，杜絕「金牌至上」的政績觀扭曲體育精神。
剛說要取消的全運會「獎牌榜」，幾天後就「死而復生」，還一直掛在體育總局的網上，遭到大陸媒體質疑，體育總局是不是假裝取消「獎牌榜」，只為應付巡視組？
對此，體育總局宣傳司司長張海峰6號說，是工作人員的失誤造成的。他說：「之所以會出現這種問題是延續了過去的做法，可能沒有更多想到關於巡視整改的要求。」
全運會「獎牌榜」按照慣性「起死回生」，大陸媒體認為，這恰恰體現出體育界根深蒂固的「唯金牌論」政績觀。另一方面，目前的全運會已經衍生出了一整套完整的生態體系，包括官員的選拔考核、運動員的培養以及奧運會參賽名額，都和全運會相關。而金牌也是衡量地方體育部門政績的最重要標準，僅僅取消公布全運會「獎牌榜」，就可以改變中國各省市的體育政績觀嗎？
前中國國家男子籃球隊隊員陳凱：「全國錦標賽也好，全運會也好，這個是最關鍵的。為甚麼呢？因為這個關係到那些體育界當官者們的利益，當官者們的地位。就是說，你一旦在這些方面有甚麼東西被別人抓牢了，你是當官的，但下面有好多人盯著你，想把你踢走。」
前中國國家男子籃球隊隊員陳凱認為，體育界規則的扭曲，根源在於專制制度。
陳凱：「中國（體育界）這個歷史，根本有很多很多的規則是沒有任何原因的，完全是政治原因而產生的。在中國所制定的規定，考量第一個，是他政治的權力，是他政治的地位，就是每個官員的政治地位。他並不是根據運動水平，或者娛樂性，或者市場規律，來制定這個規則。」
儘管體育總局6號下午撤下了與整改情況相反的兩篇競賽規程。但對於這次「烏龍事件」，中紀委駐國家體育總局紀檢組副組長施澤華表示，一定要追查、追責。
再加上在去年的巡視意見反饋中，巡視組指出多項問題，包括「比賽違背公平原則、弄虛作假，破壞賽風賽紀現象比較嚴重﹔官員兼職普遍，利益關係複雜」等。有網民表示，體育總局是著名的貪腐災區，水很深，要徹查﹔這種風頭，體育總局有人要下臺了。
知名網友周周煮粥：「跟軍中腐敗也是一樣的，（體育界腐敗）也是一大批。其實說穿了，我們大陸，每個領域都是一大批。」
陳凱：「體育界裡的各種腐敗現象，像賭博、吹黑哨，都是存在的，但是他們是出於要向上交代的方式，來把他們所說的指示傳達下來。」
去年11月初，體育總局游泳運動管理中心前花樣游泳部主任俞麗，因涉嫌操縱比賽，收受不正當賄賂，被帶走調查。《齊魯晚報》說，這一消息被多名體育圈內人士證實，並認為是體育界反腐行動的開始。
採訪/編輯/尚燕 後製/建銘
Anti-Graft Campaign Targets Sports Sector
The Communist State General Administration of Sport recently
restarted the “overall medal tally" and the Central Commission
for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) ordered a thorough
investigation of the sport sector.
To the Communist regime, gold medals have long been viewed
as the “achievement".
Will canceling the overall medal tally improve how “achievement"
should be judged?
Will the mistake of the Administration of Sport ignite
the flame of anti-corruption?
Let’s take a look.
Mainland media reported that the Admin. of Sport released
a notice about rules of the 13th General Games (draft)
on Jan. 30:
“The achievement of each delegation team is dependent
on the number of gold, silver, and bronze medals
and the total number of medals.
The tally is arranged in the order of number of total
gold medals, silver medals and bronze medals."
The 13th National Winter Games competition rules issued
on Feb. 4 shared the same content.
The Admin. of Sport published earlier on Jan. 26
what CCDI had regulated last year:
“From now on, only scores will be publicized for National Games,
not the total number of medals."
It is claimed to set up the right sport spirit and eliminate
the distorted view regarding “gold medal supremacy".
The “medal tally" going back on the Admin. of Sport Website
has the media suspect that the so-called cancelation
of medal tally was simply a “show" for the central inspection team.
Zhang Haifeng, public relations department director of Admin.
of Sport, said it was a human error:
“It was continuing an old practice without thinking much
about regulation from the inspection team."
Mainland media believe this continuation of the old practice
showed that gold medal supremacy has rooted deeply
in the sports sector.
The National Games have developed its own ecosystem
composed of the selection and testing of officials,
athletes training and quota of Olympians.
Medals have become the most important criterion
for measuring local sports sectors’ achievement.
Would it be so easy to change the achievement view
by eliminating the medal tally of the National Games?
Former Chinese national basketball team player Chen Kai:
“It is the most critical to the national championship
or the National Games.
Why? It is because it matters to the interest and the status
of those officials in the Sports sector.
Those officials have to grip onto something so’s not to get kicked
out of the field."
Chen Kai believes the distorted rules in the sports community
are rooted in the authoritarian system.
Chen Kai: “In the history of Chinese sports, many rules are
entirely political.
The rules are enacted based on political power
as the first consideration, the power of the officials.
It is not about the caliber of the sports,
entertainment or the market."
Although the Admin. of Sport replaced the competition rules
on the afternoon of the 6th, the CCDI inspection team
at the Admin. of Sport deputy head, Shi Zehua ordered
a thorough investigation.
Also, the inspection team concluded the Admin. of Sport
was faced with many issues last year:
“The competition seriously violates the general principle
of fairness, conducts falsification and destroys discipline.
Officials in general take second jobs
and share a complex interest chain."
There are netizens indicating that Admin. of Sport has been
a major disastrous zone of corruption.
The claim of thorough inspection signals there’ll be
downfall of officials from the Admin. of Sport.
Netizen Zhouzhou Zhuzhou: “It is like in the military, corruption is widespread. In fact, put it bluntly, every field is heavily corrupted in the Mainland."
Chen Kai: “The sports community is filled with corruption,
such as gambling and bad calls.
What they are doing is to follow instructions
from the superior as a task."
In early November last year, former swimming sports
management center director, Yu Li, was investigated
on alleged match-fixing and accepting illegal bribes.
Mainland media, Qilu Evening News, confirmed Yu Li’s arrest
through insiders and believed this is the beginning
of anti-graft within the sports sector in China.
Interview & Edit/ShangYan Post-Production/JianMing