【新唐人2015年01月06日訊】哈爾濱市道外區一家倉庫2號發生大火，焚燒超過20小時，造成5名年輕的消防員死亡。事故後，哈爾濱公安局官方微博發出的一則通報，由於為領導「邀功」，引發了網民們的砲轟。

在哈爾濱市北方南勛陶瓷大市場倉庫的火災發生後15個小時，哈爾濱公安局官方微博發出的一則通報「引火上身」。

這則通報全文共585字，但描述「領導高度重視」的部分佔了258字。通報不斷強調官員們「迅速作出指示」，就連宣傳部長也「在現場指揮滅火」，反而公安消防總隊負責人只是「協助指揮」。文中出現多名領導的姓名和職務，可是罹難的消防員全部變成了「無名氏」，僅僅在文章最後提到了傷亡人數。

這篇通報立刻引來網民的「炮火」。有網友說：「令人寒心！只顧領導作秀，哪管戰士喪命！」有網友批評：「哈爾濱公安局的官微，無語、痛心、噁心！」還有網友嘲笑這是「貽笑大方的高級黑」，認為哈爾濱市公安局官微發的「八股文」通報，「怎麼看都像是表彰大會。」

哈爾濱維權人士文立新：「他們這個邏輯非常怪異，喜歡把歌功頌德這一面放大了，他不反思。張三李四出來了『重視』，你們再重視，事情已經出了，你們就應該真誠的向老百姓道歉，反思你們工作的失誤，杜絕以後不要再發生，這是問題的根本。」

哈爾濱維權人士於雲峰：「著火了，省領導也好，市領導也好，你們並不是消防隊的一些專業人士。特別是在中國這種政治體制之下，省領導，市領導一到現場的話，我相信，好多專業人士他不敢發聲了。」

同時受到網絡輿論關注的，還有罹難的五名消防員都是「90後」，年齡最大的楊小偉22歲，最小的趙子龍18歲，入伍才4個月。

有網民質疑，「14年9月剛入伍的孩子讓他去參加這些戰鬥，不就是讓他去送死」。另一部分網民對中國目前的消防軍人制度表示不滿，認為武警消防啟用的大部分都是年輕、經驗不足的入伍新戰士，消防人員應該專業化、職業化。

於雲峰：「消防隊也是按照軍隊的兵役法服役，它每年都要有新兵的充實，老兵一定會退役。這令人有點不太理解，救火屬於技術工種，需要有經驗的，而每年有經驗的老兵都退役了。至少來講，任何一個消防部隊裡都應該有兩年以上的兵，不應該都是新兵，為甚麼要叫新兵投入到救火的一線當中去？」

目前，對於起火原因，當局表示仍在調查中，但相關責任人已經被控制，一旦調查出結論，將對其「嚴肅處理」。

不過，大陸媒體和網民已經列出火災的許多相關「隱患」，追問政府是否該為這些「隱患」負責。例如，起火的倉庫是一座「爛尾樓」，不符合建築標準，一直沒有通過消防驗收，但卻讓居民和上千商戶入駐。其次，原本應該是消防通道的幾個出入口，都被改裝成商鋪，監管部門也沒有過問。再次，是哈爾濱老舊小區的規劃存在消防隱患，道路狹窄，人員車輛密集。

哈爾濱維權人士於雲峰在火災後進行了獨立調查，他認為，火勢原本有可能被控制。

於雲峰：「當地居民講是這樣的情況：著火的時候消防車已經去了，去了之後並沒有及時救助。原因是甚麼呢？是消防車開不進去，距離著火點非常遠。而消防車卻沒有帶延長帶。所以只是做了一些簡單的救助工作。他們可能是犯了一個經驗上的錯誤，認為這個火災沒有甚麼問題，沒有想到火很快就躥到商場裡，火就著大了。」

中國近期發生多起事故。跨年夜上海發生了至少36人死亡的踩踏事故﹔湖南郴州廠房2號坍塌，6人遇難﹔貴州水黃公路2號有兩車相撞，造成6人死亡，遵赤高速4號塌方，3人遇難。

採訪編輯/尚燕 後製/舒燦

Monday’s Harbin Public Security Bureau Fire Notification Stereotypical

On Jan. 2, a fire broke out at a warehouse in Harbin city,

burning for over 20 hours.

Five young firefighters perished.

After the accident, a notification from the Harbin Public

Security Bureau official microblog triggered

criticism from netizens due to its seeking credit

for leadership during the accident.

An official notification from Harbin Public Security Bureau

microblog was released regarding the fire about 15 hours

after the incident at North Nan Xun ceramic market

in Harbin.

A 585 character notification with 258 words described

the attention the matter received from leadership.

The notification repeatedly stressed the officials’ quick

response including from the propaganda minister

who helped put out the fire at the scene.

However, the Public Security Fire Department director

was only assisting in directing.

Several leaders’ names and titles were listed

in the notification;

But the dead firefighters all remained anonymous.

There were only “casualties” according to the article.

This notification immediately received criticism

from netizens.

Some netizens said, “It’s so sad that the leadership

only puts on a show.

Who cares about those dead soldiers?!"

Some netizens criticized, “Harbin Public Security Bureau’s

official microblog made us speechless, sad and sick."

Some mocked it as a high level exposure of themselves

and said the stereotypical notification read more like

an award ceremony.

Harbin activist Wen Lixin: “They have very strange logic

to excessively praise their attention but no self-examination.

No matter how you pay attention, it happened already.

You should truly apologize to the people and re-think

your mistake to avoid it.

It’s the basic problem.”

Yu Yunfeng: “No matter if you are provincial leaders or city

leaders, you are not fire department professionals.

Especially under the current political system, once

the provincial and municipal leaders come to the scene,

I believe, a lot of professionals dare not say anything."

At the same time, the five firefighters’ deaths attracted

attention because they were all born after 1990.

The oldest was 22-year-old Yang Xiaowei; the youngest

was an18-year-old who was enlisted for only four months.

Some netizens questioned, “Isn’t it equivalent to sending

them to death because they just joined in September 2014?

Other netizens expressed dissatisfaction for the current

fire system due to the use of young, inexperienced

new soldiers as firefighters.

They believe they should be professionalized.

Yu Yunfeng: “The fire department acts according

to the conscription law with new soldiers enrolling

and veterans retiring every year.

It doesn’t make sense because firefighting is a skilled job

that requires experience.

At least there should be some soldiers with more than two

years’ experience, not all new soldiers.

Why allow all new soldiers go to the front line?”

Currently, the cause of the fire is still under investigation,

but those who are responsible have to be controlled.

Once concluded, they will be severely dealt with."

However, the Chinese media and netizens have questioned

a number of fire-related risks and asked whether

the government is responsible.

For example, the warehouse did not meet building

standards and had not passed the fire inspection.

But they allowed residents and thousands of merchants

to settle.

Secondly, the several supposed fire exits were converted

into shops without intervention from regulators.

Again, Harbin’s old districts are fire hazards with narrow

roads and high volume pedestrian and vehicle traffic.

Yu Yunfeng, who conducted an independent investigation,

believes the fire could’ve likely been controlled.

Yunfeng Yu: “Local residents said the fire engines

did not respond in time.

What is the reason?

It’s because the fire engines couldn’t go in due to being

very far from the fire point with no extension belt.

So they just did some simple relief work.

They probably made an inexperienced mistake and believed

there was no problem with this fire.

However, they didn’t consider that the fire could jump

into the mall quickly and become large.”

China has had several accidents recently.

At least 36 people died in the New Year’s Eve stampede

in Shanghai;

Six people died at Hunan Chenzhou factory collapse

on Jan. 2;

Six people died at two vehicles’ collision

at Guizhou Shuihuang road;

Three people died at a fourth highway collapse in Zunchi.

Interview & editing/ShangYan post-production/ShuCan