【禁聞】美國會再次拋棄中國嗎?

Facebook

【新唐人2014年05月31日訊】最近對於美、中兩國關係而言,無論是在中國與周邊國家的領土爭端,還是在中國貿易政策上,兩國的分歧越來越大,美國也在一些經貿組織上直接把中國排除在外。不過,美國的行動,卻把中共和目前正受到制裁的俄國,緊緊的綁在了一起。美國《華爾街日報》指出,從歷史上看,美國積極涉足中國事務時,中國比較順風順水﹔而當美國拋棄中國時,中國往往會走背運。請看報導。

5月29號的《華爾街日報》報導指出,現在中國大陸的歷史教科書都說,是1919年爆發的「五四運動」,迫使北洋政府代表拒絕在巴黎和會上簽約,從而打破了日本奪佔中國青島的美夢。但教科書沒有說明的是,日本對青島的佔領一直持續到1922年,是美國在1921年的「華盛頓會議」上,聯手英國和「中華民國」對日本施壓,才真正迫使日本將青島交還給中國的。

《華爾街日報》還說,上世紀70年代初,美國總統尼克松決定利用中、蘇矛盾,來瓦解共產主義陣營。正是從那一刻起,中國才從閉關鎖國中走出來,才真正有了今天的進步。

另外,《華爾街日報》表示,從1931年日本發動「九一八」事變,到37年全面侵華,還有上世紀40年代末爆發國、共內戰,由於當時美國顧忌國內經濟和民眾厭戰情緒,這都給中國造成了極其嚴重的後果。

旅美中國社會問題研究人士張健表示,美國當時的動機是出於善意,或者是出於對自身經濟利益的考慮,這些都很正常。而美國的政策對中國影響卻極大,因為美國在世界上還在起著主導作用,其他國家也會跟隨。

旅美中國社會問題研究人士張健:「如果說美國將中國問題擱置了或者杯葛中國的話,中國無論是從它的政治上,還是在它的經濟或者雙方的貿易上,中國一定得到巨大的損失。」

其實,美國在經濟上已經有拋棄中共的趨勢。

目前,美國另起爐灶,搭建了三個新的世界貿易組織談判,這包括《跨太平洋夥伴協定》、和《跨大西洋貿易與投資夥伴關係協定》以及《服務貿易協定》。但都把中共排除在外。

張健:「美國已經發現了,在最早美國允許中國WTO之後,美國發現美國在上中共的一個當。因為中共所有承諾的對美國的這些政策,包括對人權的改善,中共只是拿到了優惠,並沒有實現他的諾言。」

張健指出,如果美國繼續放縱沒有信譽的中共,就會失去在全世界的地位,而美國政府也不會因為自己的企業在中國會受到要脅,而放棄自己的良心。所以,美國採取了冷處理的方式,來對中共進行排擠。

《華爾街日報》表示,鑒於目前美國積極推進「將中共孤立於世界主要市場之外」,這也表明,美國不會讓自己的全球戰略利益,被自己在華的經濟利益,牽著鼻子走。

其實,目前中共已經倒向了俄羅斯。

在俄國吞併克里米亞之後,俄國受到美國和西方的制裁。

中共所做的是,不僅讓俄國總統高調訪問中國,還給俄國及時送上了4000億美元的購銷協定大禮包。

張健:「中國的利益是建立在破壞中國人民本身自身利益上,所發展出來的利益,它只是符合中共的的利益。」

張健表示,中共從來沒有一個戰略夥伴超過10年,歷史也證明,中、俄關係不可能保持長久,中、俄從來沒有真正好過。

2009年2月,俄國軍艦將中國貨輪「新星」號擊沉,「開火射擊的時間長達數小時」﹔當年俄國高層還強力關閉以華商為主的莫斯科集裝箱市場,沒收了數十億美元的華商貨物﹔2010年12月,幾百名名中國人從莫斯科和符拉迪沃斯託克(也就是海參威)被驅逐出境。

美國政論作家陳破空撰文指出,歷史上中國飽受俄國侵略、欺凌,中共今天扮演的不過是一個再度引狼入室的可悲角色。而僅僅因為堅守一黨專政,非要走上「親俄反美」的不歸路,中共損害的是國家和民族的根本利益。

採訪/易如 編輯/宋風 後製/蕭宇

Will the U.S. Discard China Again?

The disagreements between China and the U.S. have grown

bigger recently over issues of disputed lands between China

and neighboring nations over China’s trade policy.

The U.S. also excluded China in some trade agreements.

But the U.S. action made the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)

develop close ties with Russia who is currently sanctioned.

The World Street Journal says based on history, China often

did well when the U.S. actively participated in China’s affairs;

And when the U.S. discarded China, China often had troubles.

Please see the report.

The WSJ published an article on May 29, indicating China’s

history textbook say the May 4 movement in 1919 forced the

Chinese government to refuse to sign the agreement at the

Paris Peace Conference, stopping Japan seizing Qingdao City.

But the textbook doesn’t say that Japan’s occupation in

Qingdao lasted till 1922.

Japan truly returned Qingdao to China after the U.S.

co-operated with England and China to put pressure on Japan

at the Washington Conference in 1921.

The report says U.S. president Richard Nixon decided to use

the conflict between China and Russia to break the Communist

bloc in the 70s’.

From then on, China started to open its door to the world,

and truly started to make progress.

The report also says the China and Japan war in 1931,the

Japanese invasion in 1937, and the Chinese civil war in the

late 1940’s brought severe impacts on China.

But the U.S. didn’t do anything due to its own economic

situation and the war weariness of U.S. society.

Zhang Jian, China issue researcher in the U.S. indicates it is

common for the U.S. to consider its own economy.

But the U.S. policy certainly has a huge impact on China,

because the U.S. plays a leading role in the world, and

other countries follow it.

Zhang Jian: “If the U.S. sets aside China issues, or boycotts

China, China will lose a lot on economy and bilateral trade."

The U.S. has actually shown the trend

of discarding China in the economy.

The U.S. has established three new world trade agreements;

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Transatlantic Trade and

Investment Partnership,and Trade in Service Agreement.

But none of them involve China.

Zhang Jian: “After the U.S. let China into the WTO, the U.S

realized that it was being cheated by the CCP.

The CCP didn’t fulfill its promises on policies including

improving human rights condition.

The CCP only takes the benefits."

As the U.S. companies are threatened in China, now the U.S.

uses this cold treatment to discard China.

The WSJ says the U.S. is currently “isolating the CCP from

the world main market", indicating that the U.S. doesn’t

allow China to lead its economy and interest in the world.

In fact, the CCP has leaned towards Russia.

Russia has been sanctioned by the western world and the U.S,

after it annexed the Crimea.

The CCP not only allows the Russian president to visit China

with a high key event, but also offered a timely $400 billion

trade agreement gift.

Zhang Jian, “China’s interest is based on damaging Chinese

peoples’ interests. The interest only benefits the CCP."

Zhang Jian says the CCP never has a strategic partner

longer than 10 years.

History proves that the China-Russia relationship won’t

last long either.

China and Russia have never truly gotten along well.

A Russian warship fired for “several hours" on a Chinese

freighter and sank it in February 2009.

The same year, Russian top officials forced a container

market in Moscow run by Chinese merchants, to shut down.

They seized billions of dollars worth of goods

from Chinese merchants.

Hundreds of Chinese people were forced to leave

Moscow and Vladivostok in December 2010.

Chen Pokong, a political commentator in the U.S. wrote

an article, saying China has been invaded and bullied by

Russia in history, and the CCP today is playing a tragic

role by asking for trouble.

In order to uphold the one party dictatorship, the CCP is

determined to get close to Russia and against the U.S.

It’s damaging the nation and peoples’ fundamental interests.

Interview/Yi Ru Edit/Song Feng Post-Production/Xiao Yu

相關文章