【禁聞】中共能源局長被實名舉報 貪腐 造假

Facebook

【新唐人2012年12月08日訊】目前正在莫斯科出席「中俄能源談判」的中方副代表,中共國家能源局局長劉鐵男,被《財經》雜誌副主編羅昌平實名舉報﹕涉嫌收受巨額匯款、學歷造假、為情人謀職等。其中,劉鐵男涉嫌收受巨額匯款已不是第一次被揭發,因此,更受到各界的矚目。

6號上午,《財經》雜誌副主編羅昌平,在兩家微博連續發出三則微博,實名向中紀委舉報劉鐵男涉嫌學歷造假。羅昌平說,劉鐵男在日本做經濟參贊時,經由情人的幫助,獲得名古屋市立大學「修士學位」的榮譽證書,但並非學位證書﹔劉曾經請校方在證書上加「學位」字樣,並將「可以評價等同」改為「特殊培養授予學位」,但被拒。

羅昌平舉報之二,是劉鐵男與商人倪日濤結成官商同盟,劉鐵男任處級職位的妻子郭靜華、兒子劉德成,在倪日濤的公司持有股份﹔而且涉及境外收購騙貸國內銀行﹔以及多次收受倪日濤公司巨額匯款。另外,羅昌平舉報劉鐵男與情人徐某在日本相識,劉曾親自為徐出函介紹工作。雙方因利益關係反目後,女方多次受到死亡威脅。

羅昌平在微博發出的貼子都附有相關材料、參見報導聯結以及劉徐的合照。三條微博分別引起一百多萬網友的關注,數千條轉發和評論。

當天下午3點之後,中共國家能源局新聞辦公室相關負責人向媒體說,羅昌平所言「純屬污衊造謠」,「能源局正在聯繫有關網路管理部門和公安部門,正在報案、報警。將採取正式的法律手段處理此事」。並且聲稱,劉鐵男已經得知此事。

有不少律師在微博回貼關心此事。北京「才良律師事務所」律師朱孝頂7號向《新唐人》表示,公民實名舉報,是憲法權力,舉報是否屬實,應當由有權機關來作認定。

北京「才良律師事務所」律師朱孝頂:「包括公安機關、檢察院、紀檢監察都有權力去查處。但是,國家能源局做為下級單位,是沒有權力斷然否定,直接就草率的說是純屬污衊。對於,現在他們國家能源局新聞發言人的這種答復,我認為過於草率,它已經屬於越位。」

北京《冰點》週刊主編、原《中國青年報》資深記者李大同也指出,中共國家能源局新聞辦的作法是護短。羅昌平的舉報有根據,劉鐵男必須提出說明。

北京《冰點》週刊主編李大同:「要沒事你怕甚麼,還動用警力、還報警還抓人?開甚麼玩笑。現在輿論的壓力是很大的。我覺得抓不了,故作氣勢洶洶、氣急敗壞,其實心裡很著急。如果你甚麼問題都沒有你何必這麼光火,還是有問題。」

不過,7號一早,網友「布衣老叟」發的貼子已經引起了大家的關注。貼子說:【號外】國家能源局官方網站,已撤下劉鐵男所有的頭版圖片和活動新聞。

事實上,《財經》雜誌曾做過一篇名為《中國式收購:一名部級高官與裙帶商人的跨國騙貸》的報導。當時,《法國國際廣播電臺》曾跟進報導,並引述舉報人的網路材料,點出涉案人正是劉鐵男。但中共紀檢監察部門沒有任何反應;網路上的舉報材料則一次次被刪除。

李大同認為,目前,中國就缺羅昌平這樣的人,大家都應該聲援他。

李大同:「這樣的年輕人越多越好,就像牛虻嘛,專門盯你(貪腐的高官),這就是要盯的你渾身不自在。」

據報導,羅昌平是資深調查記者,曾公布公共情婦《李薇調查》,其中涉及多名中共部級高官,至少涉及一名現任政治局常委。羅昌平在調查記者圈中頗有職業聲望。許多法律人、媒體人呼籲,對羅的舉報,中紀委應作嚴肅獨立的調查。

採訪編輯/梁欣 後製/周天

New Chinese Official’ Scandal Going Viral

Liu Tienan is the director of China’s National Energy Bureau,

and a vice chief representative at the Sino-Russian energy negotiation held in Moscow.

Recently, Liu was exposed online by Luo Changping,

a vice chief editor of Finance magazine.

Using his real name, Luo disclosed that Liu was involved in

serious corruption, fake education background, arranging employment for his mistresses, etc..

This is not the first time when Liu’s corruption was exposed,

thus it attracted wide attention.

On December 6, vice chief editor of Finance magazine

Luo Changping issued three postings on two websites.

Luo used his real name to report on Liu Tienan’s

fake education background.

Luo said, Liu obtained honorary certificate of monks degree

in Nagoya City University, Japan, with his mistress help, while working as economic counselor at Chinese embassy.

As certificate is not a diploma, Liu made an attempt

to ‘upgrade’ his education, Luo explains.

Liu asked the university to add “diploma” to his certificate,

and to change the certificate from “equivalent” to “granting degree for special education,” but was refused.

Secondly, Luo reported that Liu colluded with trader

Ni Ritao to organize an official business alliance.

Liu’s wife Guo Jinghua, a middle level officer,

and his son Liu Decheng held shares in Ni’s company.

They are involved in fraudulent loans from domestic banks

for buying companies abroad.

Also, Liu received huge sums of money

from Ni’s company.

Additionally, Luo reported that Liu met his mistress Xu

in Japan and tried to find a job for Xu in Ni’s company.

However, this led to them becoming economic enemies

and Xu receiving death threats several times.

To this posting Luo has attached related materials,

reports’ links and pictures of Liu.

The three publications attracted about one million netizens,

with several thousand forwards and comments.

At 3 pm that day, a National Energy Bureau’ representative

spoke to the media, saying that Luo is spreading rumors.

And that they are contacting the relevant internal

management and security department to report the case.

They would take legal actions to deal with this situation.

And claimed Liu has been informed about the matter.

Many attorneys commented on the case.

On December 7, attorney of Cai Liang Law Firm in Beijing,

Zhu Xiaoxiang said to NTDTV that the author using his real name in the publication is a constitutional right.

Whether the disclosed information is true or not,

is up to the relevant departments to decide, Zhu said.

Zhu Xiaoxiang: “These include security departments,

Procuratorate, and discipline inspection and supervision departments, which have the right to investigate.

However, being a subordinate to those, the National Energy

Bureau has no right to directly say is this a rumor or not.

I think the response of the Energy Bureau’ spokesman

is too hasty.”

Chief editor of Ice Point Weekly, and former senior reporter

of China Youth Daily, Li Datong points out that this action of National Energy Bureau is to cover things up.

Luo’s report offers too much evidence,

Liu has no choice but to reply.

Li Datong: “If you have no problem, there is no need to

worry about it and to dispatch police to arrest the messenger.

The public pressure is big, all the actions are bogus, and they

are very worried. This just proves that Liu’s problem is true.”

However, in the morning of December 7, a comment

by netizen “Buyilaosou” caught the attention again.

It said that the National Energy Bureau’ official website

had removed all front page pictures and news of Liu.

In fact, Finance magazine published an article, titled, “China

– acquisition: a ministerial officials and crony businessmen, and their multinational fraudulent loans."

Radio France Internationale also reported on this, quoting

materials from its reporter, who’s name was Liu Tienan.

However, there was no response to this by relevant discipline

departments of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The materials on the internet

were just deleted repeatedly.

Li Datong thinks that currently, there are not many people

in China like Luo, thus people should support him.

Li Datong: “It will be great if more and more people

can act like this young man.

Like a gadfly, selectively biting corrupted senior officials,

which will bring them discomfort.”

According to reports, Luo is a senior investigative reporter.

He publicized the mistresses case, “Li Wei investigation."

Many ministerial level officials were involved in it, including

a current member of CCP’s top Standing Committee.

As an investigative journalist,

Luo has a high occupational reputation.

Many legal and media people called for Luo’s reports,

thus CCP’s Central Commission should investigate the case.

相關文章