【新唐人2012年10月3日訊】世界各國的電視節目安排，多數在晚間六點至八點之間播出新聞性節目，而播出的型態和風格也因國情不同產生不同的表現形式。同樣是共產國家，大陸媒體針對朝鮮和越南的「新聞聯播」方式，分析說：他們從《中央電視臺》到活躍在田間地頭的文藝宣傳隊，都肩負傳達「黨中央聲音」的使命。評論者也認為，中國與朝鮮的新聞聯播，是五十步笑百步！不過，有網友表示，隨著媒體的多樣化發展，了解新聞的管道日益增多，現在民眾看新聞主要是關心：哪裏出現禽流感了，哪裏發生了甚麼事故，死了多少人等等，而對國家領導人的動態其實並不關心。
「從各國新聞聯播，可以窺探到不同的意識形態、文化性格。」
大陸媒體評論文章，分析了朝鮮和越南版的「新聞聯播」方式。文章指出，朝鮮領導人的新聞一定是頭條而且比例最多，國際新聞所佔比重最小，新聞播出之間還會插播政治宣傳口號。
文章還舉例，《60分鐘》是美國歷史最長、收視率最高的十個節目之一，曾連續22年高居全美排行榜前十名。以邁克•華萊士為代表的主播、記者和編輯，不是光鮮亮麗的傳話筒，而是有靈魂、有思想、有深度的思想者。反觀朝鮮的主播李春姬們的聲音，雖然有無人能敵的肝膽俱裂，但無奈頭腦空空，很容易被民眾忘記。
有網友說，中國不也是這樣嗎，搔首弄姿，愚弄民眾，電視臺到處鶯歌燕舞，社會卻是一片唉聲歎氣。對此，文化評論家葉匡政表示，中國與朝鮮，是五十步笑百步！
文化評論家葉匡政：「首先中國的新聞聯播，不能稱為是一個新聞節目，它其實是一個政治儀式，前十分鐘說領導很忙，中間十分鐘主要說中國有多好，後面十分鐘說國外有多壞，中國的新聞聯播，實際上已經失去新聞的價值，它並不關注社會當天或前一天出現的重大事件。」
作為中共的喉舌，《央視》「新聞聯播」從1978年開播，就成了中國老百姓唯一的新聞收視節目，也就是中共當局名副其實的「喉舌」節目。
葉匡政表示，過去中國老百姓習慣吃飯的時候看電視，尤其是晚餐時間，幾乎把收看新聞聯播當成一種習慣。現在已進入網路時代，很多年輕人可以上網翻牆看境外媒體，上網和不上網的民眾，他們接觸的新聞事實不同，對中國真實情況的了解就不同，也就很容易產生爭執。
文化評論家葉匡政：「這個爭執點也就是他們對社會圖像的了解是不一樣的，一個是通過新聞聯播了解的，他認為說中國非常好，很有優勢，國外非常爛，那麼通過網絡了解的那位，他相對對中國的了解就真實一點，他對中國的這種腐敗，或者對中國的真實情況了解多一點，那麼這兩個人如果碰在一起就非常容易發生爭論。1244主要是看新聞聯播的這些人，等於是在無形中被洗腦了。」
原《河北人民廣播電臺》編輯朱欣欣表示，專制國家的新聞聯播是政治宣傳的工具，而民主國家的媒體是傳播大眾關心的消息。
原《河北人民廣播電臺》編輯朱欣欣：「各國政府的新聞聯播之間最大的差異，我想首先是政治體制制度的差異，其次是所謂的文化差異，因為在專制國家，首先是把政治權力的活動，他的影響要放在第一位的，其次才是社會新聞，民主國家是以反應多元化的一個精神，首先把受眾的社會需要放在第一位，大家關心的、民眾關心的放在第一位，他不是把政府把當局的聲音放在第一位的。」
網友「山水一色」說，甚麼時候新聞不受政府政治影響，這個社會就進入真正民主了。
採訪/田淨 編輯/黃億美 後製/郭敬
In most countries, news programs broadcast between
6 and 8pm, each with their own local style.
Mainland media said the media in North Korea and Vietnam,
from central TV stations to art propaganda teams
in the countryside, shoulder the mission of conveying
the sound from the “communist central committee.”
However, some netizens posted reviews saying there
are more and more ways to get news with the development
of media diversity, and people nowadays are mainly
concerned about avian flu, accidents and deaths, ect.
They do not care about the news on state leaders.
“We may discover different ideology and cultural
characters from the TV news in different countries.”
An article from Mainland media analyzed the news programs
in North Korea and Vietnam and found that in North Korea,
most news is about the state leaders and that type of news
also takes up the headlines.
International news is reported the least.
Political slogans exists between different news.
The article takes the program, “60 minutes” as a example.
As one of the ten highest-rated programs, “60 minutes” has
the longest history and has ranked in the top ten highest in the nation for 22 consecutive years.
Mike Wallace and other anchors, reporters and editors
are not only glamorous mouthpieces, they are also deep thinkers with soul.
On the other hand, the voices from Ri Chun-hee and other
anchors in North Korea are invincible impressive,
but the content is meaningless and therefore easily forgotten
by people.
Some netizens said that it is the same in China, TV programs
are full of joy, but the society is full of sighs.
In this regard, the cultural critic Ye Kuangzheng said that
analysis from China on TV programs in North Korea is just like the pot calling the kettle black.
Cultural critic Ye Kuangzheng: “First, the News Feed in China
cannot be seen as a real news program, and actually it is a political ritual.
News Feed usually mentions that state leaders are very busy
in the first ten minutes everyday,
and China is full of joy in the following ten minutes,
then overseas is full of disasters in the last ten minutes.
Therefore, the News Feed in China lost the value
of a news program as it does not carry big events timely.”
As the mouthpiece of CCP, the CCTV News Feed began
in 1978, and became the sole news program since then.
It is the mouthpiece of CCP, and truly worthy of the name.
Ye Kuangzheng said, in the old days, Chinese people were
used to watching TV when they had dinner, and they almost treated watching News Feed as a habit.
Now we’ve enter into the Internet age, and many young
people visit the Internet over the “wall” and find news from overseas media.
Therefore, people will get the true news through the Internet
and come to a better understanding of the true situation in China.
They often argue with people who do not use Internet.
Ye Kuangzheng: “The arguments from different people
are based on people’s understanding of the society.
Some people gain news from News Feed and think China
is very well off.
They also think foreign countries are full of disaster.
Others gain news from the Internet, and they must get more
truth including corruption and other issues.
Therefore, these two kinds of people may argue with each other.
I think people who watch News Feed often will be brainwashed.”
Zhu Xinxin, a former editor at Hebei People’s Radio said
that news programs in authoritarian nations are tools for political propaganda,
while they are messages with public
concern in democratic countries.
Zhu Xinxin, a former editor at Hebei People’s Radio: “There
are many differences with the news programs among different countries.
The first should be the differences in political and institutional
systems, then should be the cultural differences.
Because in authoritarian nations, the most important issue
is policital events and power, and news of the society takes a back seat.
News in democratic countries is based on diversity, and media
will put the public concern in the primary position without the authorities’ voice.”
A netizen named Shan Shui Yi Jue said, it will become a real
democratic society when the news is not controlled by the government.