【新唐人2012年9月28日訊】在盤錦拆遷槍案中，開槍警察在醫院接受了官方媒體採訪，他為自己行為辯解，當局也認定，他是執行警務開槍合法。這種只有官方說法或在官方陪同下的當事人說法，引發了民間極大不滿，要求獨立調查真相。學者指出，63年來中共就是靠謊言統治，一旦謊言破滅，它們一天也統治不下去。
25號，遼寧盤錦市興隆臺區警方向阻止徵地的農民開槍，致一死多傷惡性事件的主角—-派出所副所長張研為開槍行為辯護，並演示「現場經過」，他說，被打死的村民王樹傑一家「暴力抗法」，在向他衝過來不到1米的距離時，他「下意識開槍」。盤錦市檢察院將這起事件定性為「暴力妨礙公安民警執行公務事件」，並聲稱，警察是正當防衛，開槍符合規定。
張研手臂用紗布包裹，並非像以前官方通報事件經過的新聞通稿中描述的「受重傷」。
當局的結論和張研的辯護引發了眾怒，多位律師和民眾質疑他開槍是否真有必要？為何打光彈匣裡全部子彈等？為何只有開槍者的聲音而沒有受害家屬的聲音？為何媒體記者前往採訪遭跟蹤和拒絕？民眾紛紛要求獨立調查。
北京律師周立新和伍雷前往現場後，公布了所謂的《觀察報告》。報告披露，目前村裡高度緊張，有大批的維穩人員，包括盤錦市、興隆臺區政府，公安、信訪、宣傳部門的人員層層把守，戒備森嚴，非本村人員無法進村，當地警方還在持續抓捕事件相關人員。最為關鍵的是，報告中引述證人證言，指出：張研開槍距離王樹傑5到6米。
當地網民也爆料說，警察開了三槍打死王樹傑，第四槍打在他父親腿上，第五槍打在他母親的胳膊上，遼寧盤錦官方給他家400萬堵口費。這與當局的說法顯然不符。
北京民權律師唐吉田認為，從目前傳遞給外界的信息看，遼寧警察開槍的理由不像他們辯解的那樣成立。但從目前當局的一系列安排來看，就有可能導致真相被掩蓋。這會加重外界對他們非法性的質疑，也會持續增加從盤錦到遼寧省警方的負面形象，同時也會危及政府公信力和社會的穩定。
唐吉田：「現在是互聯網時代，是一個自媒體時代，你再封、再殺，畢竟不能把所有的真相所掩蓋，除非你把所有的當事人讓他人間蒸發，或者肉體消滅，這樣做的話，成本究竟能不能擔得起，是個問題。所以說，最聰明的辦法是允許客觀中立、具有公信力獨立的律師、記者介入，對於責任人也不姑息、也不手軟。」
前《南方都市報》記者朱順忠呼籲，希望盤錦事件當中有更多獨立於公權力之外的調查，讓真相回歸真相，讓謊言回歸謊言。
北京「在明律師事務所」執業律師李剛認為，盤錦槍擊事件「警察開槍違法」可能性是99%，「毀屍滅跡」犯罪行為的概率是100%，中央必須查處盤錦市有關領導，這是政治事件！
維權律師李天天也表示， 63年來，專制的中共就是靠謊言統治，一旦他的謊言統治破產了，他們一天也統治不了，他們暴力加謊言的做法也是在自掘墳墓。
李天天：「通過一件一件事情的暴露，更多的老百姓知道了他們是徹頭徹尾的騙子，政黨完全是在騙人。每一件事情都更增加了一部分醒悟的老百姓，這樣醒悟的人越來越多的話，那共產黨的統治越來越不穩定。」
周立新和伍雷的調查報告還指出，盤錦市興隆臺區待開發的樓盤隨處可見，因拆遷引起的社會矛盾已經極其嚴重，用「當地政府坐在火藥桶上」形容絲毫不過分。有證據顯示，盤錦市的暴力拆遷絕非孤例，因拆遷導致死亡也絕非個案。
《德國之聲》也有評論說，中國目前的強徵暴力事件將引爆社會矛盾，扮演引爆者角色的不是民眾，恰恰是政府。
採訪/朱智善 編輯/宋風 後製/肖顏
Doubts on Panjin’ Police “Legal” Shooting
The policeman who shot a farmer in forced land acquisition
recently was publicized by the Chinese Communist Party’ (CCP) official media.
In the interview, the police officer defended himself.
CCP’s local authorities identified that his shooting was legal.
The remarks have ignited great discontent in people.
The public called for independent investigations of truth.
Experts say, the CCP’s rule relies on lies. Once its lies get
exposed, the regime would face immediate collapse.
Zhang Yan, a police officer in Xinglong District, Panjin city,
shot dead a farmer and injured several others during land acquisition actions.
On September 25, the deputy chief of local police station,
defended himself and enacted the incident.
Zhang alleged that the killed farmer Wang Shujie’s family
were “resisting police action using violence”.
Zhang “subconsciously opened fire" when they were
rushing towards him and were a meter away.
Panjin Municipal Procuratorate said this was a case
of “obstructing police action using violence,” and that Zhang Yan acted in a self-defense.
Zhang Yan, arm wrapped in a gauze, does not look
as “seriously injured" as earlier official news report claimed.
The official conclusion and Zhang Yan’s defense
have outraged the public in China.
Lawyers and citizens questioned if Zhang really
had to shoot. Why did Zhang fire all the rounds?
Why on the scene the shooter can be heard,
but the victims are all silent?
And why were the media reporters tracked and blocked
when going to make interviews?
The public asked for an independent
Investigation of the truth.
Beijing-based lawyers Zhou Lixin and Wu Lei went
to the scene, and later released a watch report.
The report said that the village is under high pressure,
guarded by layers of stability maintenance personnel.
Non-local people are blocked to enter the village.
Local police still continues to locate the persons involved.
The report cited a witness, saying when Zhang Yan was
shooting at Wang Shujie, both were 5-6 meters apart.
Local netizens revealed that Wang Shujie had been shot
three times until he died.
The fourth bullet was shot into Wang’s father’ knee,
and the fifth hit his mother in the arm.
Panjin’s police authorities gave the family 4 million yuan
to conceal the truth.
Netizens’ exposure is clearly inconsistent
with the official claims.
Beijing lawyer Tang Jitian says, the disclosed information
has shown that the police shooting cannot be justified.
However, local authorities’ actions showed
that the truth may have been covered up.
Tang Jitian adds that this will increase public suspicions,
which will jeopardize local police image, local authorities’ credibility and social stability.
Tang Jitian: “Now we’re in the era of the internet. However
crazy the authorities block or censor the internet, it cannot hide all the truth.
Unless it makes all the parties disappear,
or physically kills them all. But can it afford to do that?
So the wisest plan is allowing the involvement
of independent lawyers and journalists.
The authorities should not allow impunity
for the liable persons.”
Former Southern Metropolis Daily’ reporter Zhu Shunzhong,
called for more independent investigation into the incident.
Li Gang, Beijing solicitor says, there is a 99% possibility,
that it was the police who had illegally opened fire.
And a 100% probability that the police authorities
burned the corpse to destroy the evidences.
Li Gang appealed to the CCP central authorities
to investigate local leaders, as this is a political event!
Human rights lawyer Li Tiantian says, the CCP has long
used lies to maintain its rule of tyranny for the past 63 years.
Once its lies get all exposed, the regime
wouldn’t be able to stay for even one more day.
Using violence and lies has actually made the CCP
dig its own grave, says Li Tiantian.
Li Tiantian: “Along with the increasing exposure of truth,
more people have come to understand the regime is a liar.
Every time the unveiled truth has awakened
some part of the civilians.
That is, the more people wake up,
the more unstable the CCP’ rule is.”
The watch report said that the real estate work-in-progress
can be seen everywhere locally.
Social conflicts caused by forced house demolitions
have been extremely tense.
This can be described as “the local authorities are sitting
on a powder keg," according to the report.
Evidences have shown that the official violent demolition
in Panjin was not an isolated case, nor were its victims.
Deutsche Welle reviewed that China’s violent
land acquisition will lead to social clashes explosion.
The broadcaster predicted that the bomber will not be
the civilians, but the CCP authorities itself.