【新唐人2012年6月15日訊】李旺陽頭七後 多人被軟禁 失蹤 騷擾

設在倫敦的國際特赦組織，6月12號發表致中國全國人大常委會委員長吳邦國公開信，敦促全國人大下令立即對「湖南六四人士李旺陽突然之死」展開徹底獨立調查。

目前處於被當局軟禁狀態的湖南維權人士尹正安對《美國之音》說：李旺陽事件出來以後， 整個湖南到目前為止已有十幾個人被軟禁， 被失蹤，有的至今下落不明，聽說是被國保帶走。邵陽也有一些朋友遭到監控，軟禁，失去聯繫。尹正安被他們軟禁了七天。整個湖南現在唯一能夠保持對外通訊通暢的只有尹正安一個人了。

而中國廣州維權法律工作者唐荊陵，也因為介入李旺陽「自殺」案，全家被騷擾，被迫暫停介入調查。唐荊陵6月7號在湖南邵陽，接受李旺陽妹妹李旺玲的委託，調查李旺陽離奇死亡案件。唐荊陵目前已回到廣州家中。

與此同時，湖北地區的維權人士，例如中國民間維權團體「民生工作室」的劉飛躍等，已被當局陸續放回家中。

李旺陽離奇「自殺」身亡之後，有維權、異議人士紛紛發表「 我不自殺」聲明。

武漢國保:秦永敏在我們手上

另外，中國民主黨創建人之一，59歲的異議人士秦永敏，5月13號結婚後，一直被當局控制在武漢地區。今年六四前夕，他們夫婦被警方帶離家中，與外界失去聯繫。

秦永敏的三哥12號接到武漢青山區國保打來的電話說，秦永敏在他們手中。他對《美國之音》說：他到處找秦永敏夫婦，但是當局不告訴情況，後來見他到處尋找秦永敏，就給他打電話說，秦永敏在他們手上。除此之外，他們甚麼也沒有說。

秦永敏曾因參加北京「西單民主牆」以及而後的一系列民間政治運動，被判刑勞教20多年。他的新婚妻子王喜風是山西人，畢業於山西師範大學。

原湖北潛江市人大代表，民間維權人士姚立法對說《美國之音》說，當局這次對秦永敏的扣押沒有任何法律依據。他說：「秦永敏先生這次不是行政拘留，更不是刑事拘留，甚麼都不是，但是當局確實是把人控制了，沒有任何的法定程序，沒有法律手續，當局行動當然就是一個非法行動，因為當局限制了公民的人身自由，哪怕是在政治權利剝奪期內。」

First 7-days After Li Wangyang’s Death, Related Persons Were Placed Under House Arrest, Went Missing, or Were Harassed.

The London-based Amnesty International issued an open

letter to the chairman of Chinese National People’s Congress

Standing Committee, Wu Bangguo, on June 12th, urging

the National People’s Congress to immediately conduct

a total independent investigation on the sudden death

of Tiananmen Incident person Li Wangyang in Hunan province.

A Hunan-based activist Yin Zhengan, who is currently under

house arrest by CCP authorities, said to VOA,

“After the Li Wangyang incident, a dozen persons have been

placed under house arrest or have gone missing so far.

Some are still unaccounted for.

I heard that they have been taken away by CCP national

security police.

Some friends in Shaoyang are suffering due to being

monitored, placed under house arrests, and losing contact.

Yin Zhengan was under house arrest for 7 days.

In all of Hunan, the only person who can keep smooth

communications with the outside is Yin Zhengan.

Chinese human rights legal worker Tang Jingling and his

family were harassed because of his participation in Li Wangyang’s “suicide” case.

He was forced to suspend the investigation of this case.

June 7, Tang Jingling accepted the entrustment of Li

Wangling, Li Wangyang’s younger sister, to investigate the bizarre death of Li Wangyang.

Tang Jingling has now gone back home to Guangzhou.

At the same time, human rights activists in Hubei Province,

such as the civil rights group Liu Feiyue’s “people’s livelihood Studio", etc., have been successively released.

After the bizarre “suicide” death of Li Wangyang, some

human rights activists and dissidents have issued statements saying, “I do not commit suicide.”

Wuhan national security police: Qin Yongmin is in custody

In addition, one of the founders of China Democracy Party,

a 59-year-old dissident Qin Yongmin who was married on May 13, has been controlled by the authorities in Wuhan.

Before June 4th this year, the couple was taken away from

home by the police, thus lost contact with the outside world.

Qin Yongmin’s third brother received a phone called from

the National security police of Qingshan district,

Wuhan City on June 12th, saying that Qin Yongmin was

in their custody.

He said to “Voice of America" that he had been looking

for the Qin Yongmin couple everywhere, but the authorities did not inform about the situation.

When they noticed him looking for Qin Yongmin everywhere,

they called him and said that Qin Yongmin was in their hands.

In addition, they said nothing at all.

For participating in “Xidan Democracy Wall” in Beijing

and other series of civil political movements, Qin Yongmin was sentenced to detention more than 20 years.

His new wife, Wang Xifeng is from Shanxi, graduated from

Shanxi Normal University.

Former representive of the National People’s Congress

of Qianjiang city, Hubei province,

civil rights activist Yao Lifa, told “Voice of America"

that there is no legal basis for Qin Yongmin’s seizure.

He said, “this time, Mr. Qin Yongmin was not in administrative

detention, nor criminal detention, and it is nothing at all.

But the authorities controlled him, without any legal

programs and legal procedures.

Of course the authorities’ action is illegal, because

the authorities limited the freedom of citizens,

even if he was during the period of being deprived

of political rights.”