【新唐人2012年5月22日訊】近來，廣東省委書記汪洋不斷高調談政改，引來外界關注。繼「破除幸福是黨賜予」的講話之後，最近汪洋又提出要「讓社會組織和公民充分自治」，再次為廣東政改試驗吹風。但有分析指出，雖然汪洋的主張有一些實質進步，但還沒有觸及憲政改革這個領域， 離真正意義上的「政改」還相差很遠。
5月17號《南方日報》刊登了中共中央政治局委員、廣東省委書記汪洋的一份調研報告。
汪洋在報告中指出，廣東是「深化改革的排頭兵」，但仍堅持社會主義市場經濟的改革方向。汪洋特別提出要理順政府與社會的關係，加快發展社會組織，把目前的大政府變成小政府。他認為，應該發揮社會組織和公民的自治作用，以增強社會的「自我修復」能力。
這也是汪洋繼去年提出「凡是社會組織能夠’接得住、管得好’的事，都要逐步交給他們」之後，進一步明確提出「讓社會組織自治」。
對此，「山東大學」退休教授孫文廣向《新唐人》表示，汪洋屬於中共體制內的改革派人物，他關於市場經濟改革的一些想法是比較好的。
孫文廣：「現在在中共的領導下，政府是大政府，社會上的組織很稀少。這是不符合民主國家的狀態的。有些事情應該讓社會上一些組織去擔當。」
時事評論員文昭也認為，汪洋的這一提法確實有實質性突破，但只是給出了一個模糊的方向。
文昭：「具體能夠做到甚麼程度，要看兩點。第一個是，他所說的收回政府權力，範圍能有多大，哪些行政審批手續可以交給社會自己去辦。還有就是，讓社會組織自治是讓哪些領域的社會組織可以自治。」
文昭同時指出，即使汪洋的主張能夠暫時實現，目前也得不到制度性的保障，因為中共可以隨時以任何理由再次取消這些自治。
文昭：「只有這個制度性解決了，根本制度性解決了，比方說：共產黨的一黨獨裁結束了，司法獨立了，然後社會媒體和新聞輿論，能夠發揮它的輿論監督作用的時候，那麼這樣一個個具體的社會進步才能固化為一個成果，固化為不可逆轉的成果。」
在此之前，汪洋曾經在5月9號的黨代會上說：「我們必須破除人民幸福是黨和政府恩賜的錯誤認識。」這一言論因為和大陸當局歷來的宣傳口徑截然不同，而引起外界普遍關注。
中國民主大學校長唐伯橋：「汪洋也好，溫家寶也好，胡錦濤也好，任何一個人，如果他們手上沒有甚麼血債的話，如果沒有做太多惡事的話，那麼應該知道，（現在是）要跟中共這個邪惡的政權切割開的時候了。再不切割的話，他們會同歸於盡的。」
與汪洋言論相呼應的是，國務院總理溫家寶治下的民政部部長李立國在5月7號宣佈，從去年（2011年）下半年，已經開始對各類社會組織進行直接登記。李立國同時強調，政治類、人權類的社會組織在登記管理上是平等的。
採訪/劉惠 編輯/李謙 後製/柏妮
Wang Yang’s New Deal: Far from Constitutional Democracy
Wang Yang, Guangdong Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
Secretary has repeatedly mentioned political reform.
He has proposed “full self-governance of social
organizations and citizens."
This was after a speech on “Happiness is not given by CCP.”
However, analysis pointed out that Wang’s idea has little
relation with constitutional reform.
Wang’s idea is far away from constitutional democracy,
although what he claims can be seen as a real progress.
On May 17, “Nanfang Daily” published a survey report
by Wang Yang,
CCP Secretary of Guandong and member of the Politburo.
Wang Yang reported that Guangdong is a “vanguard
in deepening reform” based on the socialist market economy.
Wang mentioned the “small government” policy: To straighten
out the relationship between government and society.
To accelerate the development of social organization.
He also said way to enhance “self-healing” of society
by “self-governing of social organizations and citizens".
Wang Yang stated “self-governing of social organizations”
after he spoke about “the government should hand over
the handling of social organization businesses..
Sun Wenguang, retired Professor of Shandong University
said to NTD Television that Wang Yang belongs to reformists within the CCP.
His idea on market economy reform looks fine.
Sun Wenguang: “Under the leadership of the CCP,
the government becomes a big government.
Social organizations are scarce. However,
this situation is inconsistent with a democratic society.
The social organization should play a role in dealing
with social affairs.”
Commentator Wenzhao said that Wang Yang’s claims can
be seen as real progress, but did not show a clear direction.
Commentator Wenzhao: “How to convert what he said
into what he is going to do? There are two points.
The first is what kind of administrative approval procedures
can be canceled and let the social organizations self-control?
The second is what kind of social organizations
can be self-governing? ”
Wenzhao also mentioned that perhaps Wang’s target
can be achieved temporarily.
However, there is no institutional guarantee, so the CCP can
cancel “self-governance” at any time and with any reason.
Wenzhao: “Only with solving institutional issues, for example,
ending one-party CCP dictatorship, judicial independence,
or media really playing a supervisory role; then specific social
progress can be solidified as an outcome. An irreversible outcome.”
On May 9, Wang Yang made claims at the CCP Congress.
“We must get rid of misconceptions that people’s happiness
is a gift from CCP.”
Tang Boqiao, Rector of Chinese Democracy University said:
“Anyone, including Wang Yang, Wen Jiabao or Hu Jintao, if
they do not have blood on their hands, then they should know
that now is the time to cut away from the evil CCP regime.
Otherwise, they are going to perish together.”
Echoing Wang Yang, Li Liguo, Minister of Civil Affairs
in Wen Jiabao’s Cabinet spoke on this issue on May 7.
From the second half of 2011, they started direct
registration for certain kinds of social organizations.
Li Liguo emphasized at the same time that it is the same
registration process for political organizations and human rights organizations.