【禁聞】黨媒發文反憲政 網路遭轟

Facebook

【新唐人2013年08月06日訊】黨媒發文反憲政 網路遭轟

中共喉舌媒體《人民日報》海外版,8月5號發表題為《「憲政」本質上是一種輿論論戰武器》的文章,反對憲政,聲稱「憲政只屬於資本主義,和社會主義無法相容。」引來大批大陸網友的批評。

自稱「習近平智囊團」的大陸網友「挺習反腐」表示,「反對憲政,就是否定人類政治文明。」憲政的核心價值是保障民權,限制公權,要求任何組織和個人必須在憲法和法律範圍內活動。這是現代社會的基本規則,是社會和諧穩定的基礎。

「挺習反腐」強調說,「反對憲政就是在為濫用公權張目,就是在為貪腐背書,就是在為回歸封建專製造輿論,就是企圖把中國引向社會動盪。」

大陸知名商人任志強也張貼耶魯大學教授陳志武「反憲政的荒唐邏輯」文章,表達意見。

李建軍向香港廉署舉報華潤高管

在微博實名舉報華潤集團高層貪腐的前《山西晚報》記者李建軍,8月5號前往香港廉政公署和警署商業罪案調查科,舉報共有5家公司在香港上市的華潤集團的董事長宋林及其他華潤高層。

《美國之音》報導,李建軍在廉政公署內待了1個多小時,出來後,向等候在門外的媒體簡單介紹了情況。他表示,他向廉署介紹了案情,提供了足夠立案的證據和線索。廉政公署記下了他的聯繫方式,會在48小時左右通知他是否立案。

李建軍表示,他手中的證據包括大陸國家審計署內部調查華潤電力收購案的報告、諸多煤礦買賣的協議書與支付票據等。

李建軍表示,他獲得的審計署內部調查報告,是由華潤集團內部的一位高層通過中間人轉給他的。

李建軍說,華潤集團董事長宋林的後臺相當硬,可以操控局面,緊急叫停審計署的調查。

香港立法會議員、大律師何俊仁對《美國之音》表示,如果香港廉政公署根據李建軍提供的證據,決定調查華潤集團的涉嫌貪腐,將是重大新聞。

大陸封鎖《華爾街日報》中文網

法新社8月4號報導,美國財經時政媒體《華爾街日報》中文網站日前在大陸遭到封鎖,目前還不能確定是偶然現象,還是確定性的做法。

《華爾街日報》中文網2002年開始營運,時有報導遭到中共當局封鎖,2010年與2012年更發生過整個網站一度被封的情況。

北京獨立學者杜建國在新浪微博表示,《華爾街日報》中文網被封,不知道是不是因為報導中共當局邀請世界銀行策劃「銀行私有化」有關係。

編輯/周玉林

Netizens Condemn Anti-Constitutional System Article

On August 5, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece

media People’s Daily overseas edition published an article.

The article criticized constitutional system ideology.

It claimed that constitutional system belongs to capitalism,

is not compatible with socialism.

It triggered netizens’ heated controversy.

A netizen said that to go against constitutional system

is to deny human’s political civilization.

The essence of constitutional system is to protect civil rights,

and limit public rights.

It requires the organizations and individuals to obey

the constitutional law.

This is the basic rule for the modern society, It is the

foundation to achieve a stable harmonious society.

The netizen stressed that to go against constitutional system

is abuse of public power and supports corruption.

It is the preparation for the return to feudalism,

and attempt to lead China to an unrestful society.

Ren Zhiqiang, a popular businessman in Mainland China also

posted an article “Absurd Logic of Anti-Constitutional System",

written by professor Chen Zhiwu, Yale University, for his view.

Li Jianjun Files ICAC Complaint Over Corruption

Former Journalist Li Jianjun of Shanxi Evening News has

reported on Weibo microblog of China Resources corruption.

On August 5, Li went to Hong Kong Independent Commission

Against Corruption (ICAC) and Police Station.

Li complained about five companies owned by

China Resources in Hong Kong.

He pointed out their Chairman Song Lin and

senior managers’ corruption.

Voice of America (VOA) reported that Li Jianjun spent

an hour at ICAC, later he came out spoke to media.

He said he has provided enough evidence to ICAC.

ICAC noted down his contact details, will inform him

within 48 hours whether to file the case.

Li Jianjun said that he has evidence including National

Audit Office’s internal investigation on China Resources Power

corruption allegations, the agreement of purchasing coal mine

businesses and payment receipts.

Li Jianjun said that the investigation report which he obtained,

was passed to him by a senior manager from China Resource.

Li said that man behind Song Lin is very powerful.

He can manipulate the situation, and ordered the Audit Office

to cease the investigation.

Albert Ho Chun-yan, member of the Legislative Council

told VOA that

it will be big news if ICAC decides to investigate the

allegation of China Resource’s corruption according to Li’s evidence.

Wall Street Journal Chinese Website Blocked In China

On August 4, France-Presse reported that Wall Street Journal

(WSJ) Chinese edition website was censored in Mainland China.

It is unconfirmed if it is an accident or is a decision.

WSJ Chinese edition begun to operate in 2002.

Its reports were censored frequently, particularly in 2010

and 2012, so that the entire website was blocked.

Du Jianguo, Beijing independent scholar said in Sina Weibo

that WSJ was blocked.

Is this to do with its reports on Chinese regime inviting the

World Bank to put proposal for China to privatize a major bank?

相關文章