【禁闻】昆明砍人惨案 媒体报导遭严控

【新唐人2014年03月03日讯】3月1号,云南昆明火车站发生一起严重砍人惨案。官方声称,截至3月2号9点,已有29人死亡,143人受伤。这一袭击事件迅速成为当晚大陆微博和网络的焦点事件,媒体也争相报导。但当局马上加紧了对传媒的控制,要求各媒体严格按照官方口径统一发稿,这使外界很难获知真实情况,也更显事件的怪异。

3月1号晚上9点20分,10多名统一穿着黑色服装的男子,突然手持刀具冲进人头攒动的昆明火车站广场、和售票厅,见人就砍。警察赶到现场后,有4名袭击者被击毙,1人被抓捕。

根据云南卫生厅发布的数据,截至2号早上9点,事件已经造成29人死亡,143人受伤,其中重伤73人。

昆明火车站附近酒店工作人员沈小姐:“有好多警察,好几百个。特警也有、武警也有、派出所的、交警都有。还有救护人员、救护车都有。昨天晚上经过门口,我们看到。”

袭击事件恰巧发生在中共“两会”召开前夕,使中共“两会”蒙上阴影,也使这一事件成为焦点。中共政法委书记孟建柱、和公安部长郭声琨等人紧急赶赴昆明,国家主席习近平、国务院总理李克强也就此事件作出特别指示。

网络上,人们纷纷表达对死伤者的哀悼和安慰。很多媒体也对事件竞相报导。但奇怪的是,没过不久,大陆《财新网》在微博发布的所有相关信息遭到删除。

大陆媒体人,“上海明地文化传播有限公司”运营总监朴抱一在微博发帖,披露了上级通知。通知说:对3月1号昆明火车站发生的砍杀事件,如报导,严格按《新华社》通稿或当地权威部门发布的信息报导,不做大标题、不配图片。

北京社会活动家胡佳:“这种事情当然是负面的、是黑色的,(但中共)也不能让它太多的去冲击两会‘胜利召开’的这种氛围。共产党是没有什么人性的。昆明发生的事情,当然应该上今天报纸的头版,这些事情真相的公开应该占据多个版面,这才对。”

在官媒《新华社》所发的通稿中,当局指称﹕昆明“3•01”事件是由所谓“新疆分裂势力”策划组织。

北京时政观察人士华颇:“现在是得不到别的信息,真相是什么。打死四个人,抓捕一个人,抓捕的是谁,到底是不是疆独,背后是疆独?我想要是疆独的话可能问题倒简单了,我就怕是其他什么人。如果要是其他什么人,那这个问题就更严重、更复杂了。”

北京社会活动家胡佳也谈到,所有针对无辜平民的攻击,都会被认定是反人类的恐怖主义。但这类袭击发生的根源很可能并不像中共说的那样。胡佳谈到,前不久被当局抓捕的维族知名学者伊力哈木,是维、汉两族沟通的桥梁,伊力哈木本人就非常反对类似暴力事件。

胡佳:“它会让‘亲者痛、仇者快’。这种手段只会带来更大的冲突。最大的得利者就是中共,因为中共会抹去许多年在新疆采取的那些措施,还可以从老百姓这里买好,说它镇压了恐怖,它的维稳是有理由的。”

北京时政观察人士华颇分析,中共“两会”前夕发生这样的事情,和中共的政局动荡很可能也有一定关系。因为10几个人统一服装、又都持有兵刃,如果中共的预防体系有效的话,按理是可以事先制止的。

华颇:“内部是不是有人睁一只眼、闭一只眼,任凭这个悲惨事件发生,我想还要看。”

华颇表示,另一种可能就是政法委这些人人心惶惶,对本职工作掉以轻心,造成这种事件的发生。华颇强调,从这一点也可以看出,中共对基层社会的控制有失控的迹象。

采访/易如 编辑/李谦 后制/君卓

Kunming’s Bloody Attack: The Communist Party Tightens Control Over Media Reports

On Mar. 1, a bloody assault occurred at the railway station
of Kunming city, Yunnan Province.
Official reports claim there were 29 fatalities
and 143 injuries as of 9 a.m. on Mar. 2.
The incident immediately became the hottest topic
on Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter,
and China’s Internet, and was widely reported
by Chinese media.
However, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
then tightened control over the media, and required
all reports to tow the same line as party mouthpieces.

As a result, it became very difficult to know the facts,
causing the incident to appear even more mysterious.

At 9:20 p.m. of March 1, a dozen knife-welding men
dressed in black abruptly began an indiscriminate attack
in the crowded square and ticketing lobby of Kunming
railway station.
The police later fatally shot four attackers
and arrested another.

According to Yunnan’s provincial health department,
as of 9 a.m. of Mar. 2, there were 29 fatalities
and another 143 injuries during the incident,
including 73 seriously wounded.

Ms. Shen, employee at a nearby hotel: “There are hundreds
of police officers, including special police, armed police,
local public security officer and traffic police.

There are also rescue workers and ambulances.
We saw all of that when passing by the entrance last night.”

The incident, which has drawn the world’s attention,
occurred just ahead of the CCP’s Two Meetings,
yearly high-level Communist Party sessions,
which were overshadowed by the mass attack.
The Party Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs
Committee (PLAC), Meng Jianzhu, as well as Minister
of Public Security, Guo Shengkun, are making
an urgent visit to Kunming.
CCP president Xi Jinping and premier Li Keqiang
have also issued special instructions regarding the incident.

Many delivered messages of condolences to the victims
via the Internet.
Initially, Chinese media also closely tracked the progress
of the incident.
However, all relevant Weibo reports released by Caixin.com
were soon deleted.

A Chinese media worker, management director of Shanghai
Mingdi Culture Inc., Piao Baoyi, later revealed
an announcement from higher-ups on Weibo.

The notice said the stabbing attack at Kunming Railway
Station should only be reported according to information
from Xinhua or local authorities; the report should not
use a large-font headline or any photos.

Hu Jia, Beijing Social Activist: “An incident like this
is certainly negative.
But the party won’t allow a ‘successful commencement’
of the Two Meetings to be watered down.
The Communist party is something with little humanity.

Of course the attack in Kunming should be
in today’s headlines.
The right thing is to publish multiple-page
reports regarding the truth of the incident.”

Party mouthpiece Xinhua Agency officially announced
that the bloody assault in Kunming was plotted
and performed by so-called “separatists” from Xinjiang.

Hua Po, Beijing Political Observer: “Now we have no other
informational source to learn what the truth is.
Four were shot dead and one was arrested.
Who was arrested? Is he a separatist from Xinjiang?
If that is true, I think things will become much easier.

However, if the attackers are others, the problem
would be much more serious and complicated.”

Social activist Hu Jia commented that all attacks against
innocent civilians can be defined as terrorism
against humanity.

However, the real motivation behind the attack
is likely different from what the CCP stated.
Hu Jia mentioned the famous Uyghur scholar Ilham Tohti
who was arrested by CCP authorities days ago.
Hu said Tohti was like a bridge connecting the Uyghur and
Han people, and he strongly opposed such violent attacks.

Hu Jia: “Violence only aggrieves your families and friends,
and delights your enemies.
That will only lead to more conflicts.
The party is the one that benefits most from those attacks.
That will give it a chance to hide the truth of its policies
in Xinjiang over years.
The CCP can also glorify itself saying it has suppressed
terrorists and there are legit reasons for
stability maintenance.”

Political observer Hua Po believes that the attack
may be related to the political unrest inside the CCP,
as it took place right before the Two Meetings.

The attackers were dressed uniformly
and armed with weapons.
If the CCP’s security system was running effectively,
the attack should have been averted in advance.

Hua Po: “Did someone inside the PLAC intentionally
allow the tragedy to occur?
I am still waiting for the answer to this.”

Hua said it was also possible that the PLAC staff took
their jobs lightly, resulting in the occurrence of such an event.
He emphasized that this event can be regarded as a signal
that the party is losing control over Chinese society.

Interview/Yiru Edit/LiQian Post-Production/Junzhuo

相关文章
评论