【新唐人2011年9月30日讯】大陆北京大学“公众参与研究与支持中心”在9月28号发布了《中国行政透明度报告》。报告总体认为，43个国务院各机构的总体得分，相对于省级行政单位来说分数偏低，而国务院参与评测的下设机构，仅两成及格，只有12个部门得分60分以上，得分最低的监察部仅得8分。
9月28号是“国际知情权日”。“北大公众参与中心”对中共国务院下设的43个机构，全国30个省级政府等机构进行了观察和评估。
评测团队将《信息公开条例》的执行情况做了打分和排名，指标体系包括组织配套、制度配套、主动公开、依申请公开，以及监督和救济。
43个国务院下设机构评测平均得分51.7分，只有9个单位及格，占总数的20.9%，得分最高的国家知识产权局，也仅仅68分。铁道部、国务院法制办、监察部名列后三名。
对此，网友说，神奇的国度！报告讲的太客气了！
前北京大学新闻学院副教授焦国标：“他无需对这负责当然他不透明了。有问题的、就是有缺陷的。他依据这些资料本身能不能做到透明——也就是特别如实、特别详实，就这个问题！”
作为高高在上的国务院行政机构的透明度，为什么还不如省级机构呢？
前北京大学新闻学院副教授焦国标：“因为中共国务院的特权更多，所以透明度更小。另外，中共传统中不是权力越大特权越多吗！透明度就越来越低啊！”
此外，监察部已经连续两年在《透明度报告》中垫底。去年发布的《行政透明度报告》（2009年度）中，监察部得分12分，在依申请公开项中得分为零。
而监察部官网声称，“由于监察部工作涉密性强，暂不开展依申请公开工作。”
网友揶揄监管部门说：“说你行你就行，不行也行！说不行就不行，行也不行！老百姓：不服不行！”
按照《政府信息公开条例》的规定，政府信息公开工作主管部门和监察机关，负责对行政机关政府信息公开的实施情况进行监督检查。
焦国标：“中共他是个迷信权力的东西。他权力至上他不信仰什么东西，所以说他只要有权力的话，权力越高胡作非为的程度越重。”
此外，报告中还显示，国务院法制办在“规章草案意见征集”中是“零参与”，“制度配套”铁道部得分为零。
新唐人记者陈汉、李静薛莉采访报导。
Transparency in Mainland China: Only 20% of State Agencies Pass.
Beijing University Public Participation in Research and
Support Center released a China’s Administrative
Transparency Report on September 28th.
The report shows that 43 state agencies’ overall score is
relatively lower than provincial level administrative agencies.
Only 2 out of 10 State Council’s subsidiary bodies
involved in evaluation passed.
Only 12 departments scored over 60%,
the supervision department got the lowest score of only 8%.
September 28th is the International Right-to-Know Day.
Beijing University’s public participation center evaluated
43 institutes of the CCP’s state council,
and provincial level government institutions in 30 provinces.
The evaluation team scored and ranked institutions based on
Information Disclosure Regulations.
The index system includes organizational support,
systems support, disclosure of information actively or
through application, and monitoring charitable relief support.
The average for the 43 state institutions is 51.7%, and
only 9 (20% of all) units scored passed.
The State Intellectual Property Office scored the highest at
a mere 68%, the Ministry of Railways,
the State Council Legislative Affairs Office got the lowest scores.
Former Beijing University School of Journalism associate professor
Jiao Guobiao : “They are not transparent because they don’t need to be responsible.
With the transparency of the data itself, I think there are problems.
They are based on whether the information itself can be done with
transparency, that is a truly detailed example.”
The monitoring unit had been at the bottom of
the Transparency Report in the past 2 years.
In the “Administrative Transparency Report” in 2009,
the monitoring unit only scored 12%, with a score of zero
in accordance of the application of publicizing works.
Internet users ridiculed the monitoring unit:
If I say you can do it, then you can even if you can’t,
if I say you can’t, then you can’t even if you can.
Public: we must comply!
According to Government Information Transparency
Regulations, the disclosure of government information
departments and supervisory units, are responsible
for supervising and inspecting the implementation of
information transparency regulations to state institutions.
Jiao Guobiao: the CCP blindly believes in power.
They don’t believe in anything other than power,
therefore as long as they have the power, the bigger it is,
the less responsible they are for their actions.
The report also shows thatthe State Council Legislative
Affairs Office has zero involvement in
the “opinion collection on the draft regulations” and
the ministry of Railways scored zero in “institutional framework.”
NTDTV Chen Han, Li Jing and Xue Li
