【新唐人2011年9月27日讯】近期，黑龙江省直属机关工会工作委员会，下发的一份红头文件，再次曝光中国越整治越成问题的“红头文件”问题。
《关于省直机关2011年启动慈善“一日捐”活动的通知》是黑龙江省直属机关工会工作委员会近期下发的红头文件。文件中写道，“本着自愿的原则，希望广大党员和干部职工踊跃捐款，一般按照省级领导干部400元、厅级领导干部300元、处级干部200元、处级以下职工100元为参考标准。”
政府组织的“慈善”一日捐变成“摊派”式强行捐款，许多机关人员表示很无奈。网友“风之华尔兹”留言，我就是黑龙江人，这种事是非常普遍的，而且已经存在了几十年，没有自愿捐款，直接在工资里扣。就是强迫。
红头文件中要求，捐款75%返还给捐款单位，20%上交省慈善总会统筹使用，5%用于省直基金会机动使用。“被捐款”的公务员提出质疑：为什么有75％要返还单位？返还款项用到哪里去了？如何监督？
网友“何必认真”说，如果捐款真的全额用到需要帮助的人身上，我想大家还是能接受的，关键是捐款的去向不明，制度的缺失也许将导致慈善事业的崩盘。
中共各级机关奇怪的红头文件层出不穷，例如，为了吸引投资，河南沁阳市3年出台了5个红头文件，其中规定，投资5000万以上的外地客商可享受在本地开车违法不罚款、娱乐场所消费不受查、子女就学不审核等12项优厚待遇。
红头文件原本是仅次于法律、法规、规章的政府文件，但深谙中共党政部门行事规则的人们都知道：“黑头（法律）管不住红头（文件），红头管不住无头（领导指示）。”
北京市博圣律师事务所律师韩一村：“从法律上它不合法。中国是一个一党专政的国家，在具体事情上，可能它就发红头文件来代替法律的规定。这属于违法行为。”
几年前，河北省保定市政府想方设法制定所谓“文件”，向企业吃、拿、卡、要，导致保定市2000多家企业大规模外迁。
“权利运动”组织发起人之一胡军：“这个体制就不是法制的一个社会，它本身就是一个独裁统治。为了维护他们能够继续贪得无厌的去欺压和抢劫老百姓的财产，所以就说稳定压倒一切，而法律什么都可以不要，任何人，只要是他手中有权力，他就可以去解释法律。”
资料显示，1949年后，中共在全中国已经开展了12次法规规章清理活动，其中5次全面清理，6次专项清理。不过，这种运动式清理无法从根本上治理红头文件之乱，反而让红头文件成为了体制内的痼疾。
韩一村律师：“中国不但专政，而且还独裁。专政指的是一党专政，独裁指的是个人揽权。书记大权在握就形成了独裁。当然如果要改变这种局面，还是要推动政治体制改革，来解决这个问题。让人民真正拥有政治权利，让人民决定执政党。”
据国内媒体报导，中共国务院正在考虑扩大行政复议法的受案范围。如果实现，对于那些有争议的“红头文件”，权利受到影响的市民有望直接申请行政复议。学者指出，无论是事前备案，还是事后备案，主要由政府法制机构承担，由于各个部门间在利益上的共同体关系，监督制约难免流于形式。
胡军：“这个东西根除是一个很简单的道理，就是解体这个独裁统治。如果这个独裁不结束的话，站在这个体制里的每一个人的生命都会受到威胁。每一个人都是受害者，哪怕是胡锦涛和温家宝，他同样，当他失去权力地位的时候，那么他的生命就会受到威胁。”
新唐人记者朱善智、尚燕、张健采访报导。
********************
Red Tape Above Laws?
Recently, a red tape issued by the worker union’s
committee of Heilongjiang Province’s direct authorities
has exposed the growing issues
of the “red tape” practices in China.
“Notice on launching ‘Donation Day’ charity event
by the provincial authorities in 2011″ is a red tape,
issued by the worker union’s committee
of Heilongjiang Province’s authorities.
It states, “Based on voluntary principles, the party members,
cadres and workers are expected to donate actively.
In general, consider the reference standard below:
RMB400 for provincial cadres,
RMB300 for department-level cadres,
RMB200 for a division-level cadres, and RMB100 for under division-level cadres and workers.”
The “Charity” Donation Day organized by the government
has become a forced donation in “assessed" form. Many governmental workers say that they are helpless.
Netizen Feng zhi Huaerzi wrote: “I am from
Heilongjiang province. These things are very common.
And they existed for decades. It’s not voluntary donation.
They take it directly from your wage. We are forced.”
The red tape says that 75% of the donation will go
to donating departments, 20% to the Provincial Charity,
for coordinating the process, and 5% will go
to the provincial Foundation for mobility use.
The donating civil servants ask, why 75% of the donation
returns to the donating departments?
What is the donation going to be used for?
How can this be supervised?
Netizen Hebi Renzheng wrote, if all the donation is totally
used for the people who need help, I think we will accept it.
The key is that it is unclear where is the donation going.
The lack of policy will also lead to collapse of the charity.
There is an endless line of strange red tapes by various
authorities of the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
For example, in order to attract investment,
the city of Qingyang, Henan issued 5 red tapes in 3 years.
Some state that the foreign merchants with investment
of RMB50 million will not be fined for illegal driving,
will not be investigated in entertainment places,
will not be audited for their children’s study and so on, listing 12 such favorable treatments.
The red tapes were originally governmental documents,
inferior to laws, regulations and rules.
However, a well versed person in the CCP’s rules knows
that the laws cannot control the red tapes,
and that the red tapes cannot control
the official’s orders.
Han Yicun, a lawyer from Bosheng law firm in Beijing,
said: “It’s illegal according to the law.
China is a country with one-party autocratic rule.
On specific matters it may issue red tapes
to overrule the law regulations.
These are all illegal actions.”
A few years ago in Baoding, Hebei Province, the government
tried to establish the so-called “official documents”,
demanding and requesting enterprises to pay for some of their
expenses, such as eating, gift and so on… This resulted in a large-scale exodus of 2000 enterprises.
Hu Jun (Founder, “Rights movement" organization):
“This system is not a society with a rule of law.
It is a dictatorship. In order to maintain their
Continuous greedy oppression and robbing of people,
they say that stability is above all, ignoring the laws.
Anyone with power can interpret the law their way."
Statistics show that after 1949, the CCP had carried out
clean-up activities of laws and regulations 12 times,
5 of which are comprehensive clean-ups
and 6 are special clean-ups.
Red tapes on the contrary have become
a chronic illness within the system.
Lawyer Han Yicun: “China has not only autocracy, but
dictatorship too. Autocracy refers to the one-party rule.
Dictatorship refers to concentration of power in individuals.
The secretary’s holding of big power forms the dictatorship.
Of course, if you want to change this situation, it needs
promotion of political reforms, as to address the problem.
Let the people really have political rights,
let the people decide on the ruling party.”
Media in China said that Chinese State Council considers
expanding the Administrative Review Law’ case scope.
If realized, on the issue of disputed “red tapes” citizens can
hopefully apply for administrative reconsideration directly.
Scholars point out that whether it’s pre-filed or post-filed,
it’s mainly undertaken by the governmental law institutions.
Because of the common interests among the departments,
the supervision and control will become a mere formality.
Hu Jun: “To eradicate this is to apply a very simple principle,
namely to disintegrate the dictatorship.
If the dictatorship does not end, everyone in this system
will continue suffering from it. Every one is a victim.
Even Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao.
After losing power, they will suffer from it just the same. “
NTD reporters Zhushan Zhi, Shang Yan and Zhang Jian
