【新唐人2011年6月28日讯】大陆一位网名叫“郭美美baby”的女孩，近期在微博上掀起轩然大波。美女、炫富、红十字会、贪腐等字眼，引来众多网民们的围观。郭美美扯出贪腐链条，多位政府官员和社会名人牵涉其中。而“中国红十字会”面对信任危机，无法对公众作出合理解释。
这段视频中的主角是自称“住大别墅、开玛莎拉蒂”的20岁女孩“郭美美”。6月23号，自称拥有十多个爱马仕名包的郭美美在网上炫富，她在新浪微博认证的身份是加了“V”的“中国红十字会商业总经理”。
一位自称“红十字会”的“经理”，身家居然如此富有，这一消息不仅极速引起了社会关注，同时也引起众多网民的愤怒和质疑：“捐给红十字会的钱到底哪去了？”
在漫天的质疑声中，“郭美美”发表声明说，“中国红十字会商业总经理”的身份是自己杜撰的，并为这种“愚昧行为”致歉。而新浪网也作出“澄清”，指郭美美身份认证为演员。
“香港明镜画报”在微博中反问，那么多名称，为什么要杜撰成红十字会商会？仅仅是因为无知吗？如果你跟这个单位没有关系，你怎么可能想到这个名字？
“中国红十字会”则连发四道声明澄清，还声称，对恶意炒作事件的单位和个人，将保留追究权。
中国公民记者周曙光：“红十字会出来一个法律声明说谁再恶意炒作，红十字会就要法律追究。但是没有提到要追究郭美美的责任。”
评论认为，事件疑点多多，而红十字会辩解无力，只有“声明”而无法“证明”，只有辟谣而没有自省。
周曙光：“它光否认不行，还得说清楚。为什么会有这么多人事关系显示出她–郭美美和她的赞助者，和红十字会为什么有这么多联系？为什么她们能够使用红十字会的名义去做募捐活动？“郭美美这个事件牵扯出来，红十字会里边可能存在贪腐，所以大家觉得应该把它公开。”
对于中国红十字会的态度，中国社会科学院学者于建嵘在微博上说：“一日不公开，一日不捐款。” 他认为，此事所表现出来的是民众 对中国红十字会官僚化和长期不透明的愤怒；并且中国红十字会面对信任危机，没能给出合理解释。
《扬州晚报》 评论说，炫富，郭美美不是第一个。但是炫了刹不住车的，郭美美应该算是第一个。
随着中国网民不断深入的“人肉搜索”，事件目前已经引发连锁反应，不仅扯出贪腐链条，多位政府官员和社会名人也牵涉其中，中国网民也因此发起了一场“反贪腐”公民行动。
周曙光：“（在中国）也许民众去抨击一个政府的贪腐行为可能会被视为政治行为，但是我们去关注一个名义上的非政府组织的话，这样就会压力小很多，所以大家都在不停的追问。 ”
凤凰台名主持人杨澜，日前曾出面，想帮红十字会辟谣，不料却反被网友爆出她与中国青基会共同制造“假捐门”。杨澜紧急发表声明，说自己很清白，对于这些解释，网友们也表示不相信，正力图寻求真相。
反腐义勇军张建中：“在中国，公权力现在一直是失信于民的一个重要信号，一直失信于民。你在5.12汶川大地震时期捐的款，和其他一些有灾难的时候人民捐的款都哪里去了？从来没公开过。具体每一笔的款项都到哪里去了？也没有公开过，反正至少我没看到过，网友也在怀疑这些款项都到哪里去了。所以来讲，躲猫猫。“
郭美美乘坐班机于27号凌晨抵达北京。有网友认为，郭美美可能会搬家或前往国外，“郭美美事件”的中心人物可能将神秘消失于公众视野。
新唐人记者 常春 王子琦 郭敬采访报导
Red Cross Executive Criticized for Showing Off
A girl named Guo Meimei recently showed off
her wealth on micro-blogs and caused an uproar.
Many incidents of corruption have been exposed.
Many officials and celebrities are implicated.
China Red Cross is facing a crisis of confidence,
but it fails to offer the public a sound explanation.
The protagonist in the video is a 20-year-old,
who claims to live in a mansion and drives a Maserati.
On June 23, she bragged about owning a dozen Hermes.
She is a commerce general manager at China Red Cross,
as per her verified identity by Sina.com Micro-blog.
A self-proclaimed GM of Red Cross is so wealthy!
The news caused a stir in the online community,
and drew anger and doubts from netizens, who ask,
What happened to the donations to Red Cross?
Amidst the questions and doubts, Guo apologized for
her fabricated identity and her “foolish behavior”.
Sina declared to have identified Guo to be an actress.
Hong Kong’s Mirror Illustrated asked these questions:
Among all names, why chose “Red Cross Commerce”?
If you have nothing to do with this place,
how did its name come to your mind?
China Red Cross Society issued four statements
to clear its name and to reserve its rights to
further investigate this incident and its perpetrator.
Chinese independent reporter Zhou Shuguang:
“The Red Cross announced to investigate the incident.
However, why doesn’t it do an investigation of Guo?”
The media find the incident suspicious.
Red Cross’s explanation is not reasonable.
It can only “claim” rather than “prove”.
Zhou Shuguang: “Denial alone is not good enough.
The many connections between Guo, her sponsors
and the Red Cross need to be explained.
How can they solicit donations in Red Cross’s name?
Now the Guo Meimei incident has been exposed,
it is possible that corruption exists in Red Cross.
Thus, the organization should be made transparent.
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences scholar
Yu Jianrong wrote on micro-blog:
“As long as it is not transparent, I don’t donate.”
He believes that this incident shows people’s anger
towards an opaque bureaucratization of Red Cross.
Also, when facing a confidence crisis
Red Cross is unable to offer a sound explanation.
Yangzhou Evening News commented that
although many people had showed off their wealth,
Guo is the first who fails to step on the brake in time.
Chinese netizens’ further investigation has triggered
a chain reaction and exposed a corruption chain.
Many officials and celebrities are implicated.
Thus, Chinese netizens have initiated
a civilian “anti-corruption” movement.
Zhou: Many may view it as a political act
for citizens to attack officials’ corruption.
However, if we focus on a nominal NGO,
the pressure would be much smaller.
That is why many people keep on asking questions.
Well-known host at Phoenix TV, Yang Lan,
tried to help clear Red Cross’s name.
However, she invited suspicion for
being a co-creator of a “fabricated donation gate”.
Even after she issued a statement to claim innocence,
netizens still wouldn’t believe her.
Anti-corruption volunteer Zhang Jianzhong:
The authorities have lost their credibility among people.
Where did donations for the Sichuan Earthquake go?
The distribution of donations is never made public.
Netizens also question the whereabouts of the money.
Some people are playing hide and seek with us.
Guo’s flight arrived in Beijing on June 27.
Some believe that Guo may move or go abroad.
The central figure of the Guo Meimei incident
may disappear mysteriously from the public view.
NTD reporters Chang Chun，Wang Ziqi and Guo Jing
